Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • >>> TONIGHT WE ARE LAUNCHING A

  • >>> TONIGHT WE ARE LAUNCHING A NEW SERIES ON "THE BEAT", BACK

  • NEW SERIES ON "THE BEAT", BACK STORY, OUR GOAL IS TO PROVIDE

  • STORY, OUR GOAL IS TO PROVIDE DEEP REPORTING AND MORE BACK

  • DEEP REPORTING AND MORE BACK STORY ABOUT ONE OF THE PEOPLE

  • STORY ABOUT ONE OF THE PEOPLE RUNNING FROM PRESIDENT IN EACH

  • RUNNING FROM PRESIDENT IN EACH STALLMENT.

  • STALLMENT. IT’S A -- EACH INSTALLMENT.

  • IT’S A -- EACH INSTALLMENT. BY LOOKING AT EACH CANDIDATE, IT

  • BY LOOKING AT EACH CANDIDATE, IT AIMS TO PUT SUBSTANCE AND

  • AIMS TO PUT SUBSTANCE AND CONTENT ABOVE ELECTION COVERAGE,

  • CONTENT ABOVE ELECTION COVERAGE, IN UNRELIABLE EARLY POLLING.

  • IN UNRELIABLE EARLY POLLING. IN THE COMING WEEKS, WERE GOING

  • IN THE COMING WEEKS, WERE GOING TO ZERO IN ON A RANGE OF

  • TO ZERO IN ON A RANGE OF CANDIDATES, LIKE KAMALA HARRIS,

  • CANDIDATES, LIKE KAMALA HARRIS, ELIZABETH WARREN.

  • ELIZABETH WARREN. TONIGHT WE BEGIN WITH A LOOK AT

  • TONIGHT WE BEGIN WITH A LOOK AT A CONTENDER WITH AN UNUSUAL

  • A CONTENDER WITH AN UNUSUAL PROFILE, THE 37-YEAR-OLD LEADER

  • PROFILE, THE 37-YEAR-OLD LEADER OF A TOWN OF JUST OVER A HUNDRED

  • OF A TOWN OF JUST OVER A HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO ONLY

  • THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO ONLY RECENTLY BECAME WELL KNOWN

  • RECENTLY BECAME WELL KNOWN ENOUGH THAT PEOPLE ARE STARTING

  • ENOUGH THAT PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO GET HIS NAME RIGHT.

  • TO GET HIS NAME RIGHT. >> THIS GUY NAMED PETE WHOSE

  • >> THIS GUY NAMED PETE WHOSE LAST NAME NOBODY CAN PRONOUNCE,

  • LAST NAME NOBODY CAN PRONOUNCE, THE MAYOR OF SOUTH BEND INDIANA.

  • THE MAYOR OF SOUTH BEND INDIANA. >> I’M GOING TO TRY TO PRONOUNCE

  • >> I’M GOING TO TRY TO PRONOUNCE THIS MAYOR’S NAME.

  • THIS MAYOR’S NAME. >> PETE BUTTIGIEG.

  • >> PETE BUTTIGIEG. >> THE MAYOR OF SOUTH BEND, PETE

  • >> THE MAYOR OF SOUTH BEND, PETE BUTTIGIEG.

  • BUTTIGIEG. >> THAT’S CLOSE, BUTTIGIEG,

  • >> THAT’S CLOSE, BUTTIGIEG, RIGHT?

  • RIGHT? >> PETE BUTTIGIEG.

  • >> PETE BUTTIGIEG. >> HOW DO YOU SAY YOUR NAME,

  • >> HOW DO YOU SAY YOUR NAME, WHAT IS THE CORRECT

  • WHAT IS THE CORRECT PRONOUNCEUATION OFPRONUNS

  • PRONOUNCEUATION OFPRONUNS NATION --

  • NATION -- PRONUNCIATION OF YOUR NAME.

  • PRONUNCIATION OF YOUR NAME. >> PETE.

  • >> PETE. >> PETE JUMPED INTO A RACE

  • >> PETE JUMPED INTO A RACE AGAINST FAR MORE EXPERIENCED

  • AGAINST FAR MORE EXPERIENCED CANDIDATES TO TRY TO BE THE FACE

  • CANDIDATES TO TRY TO BE THE FACE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

  • OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. DO YOU REMEMBER THAT BID?

  • DO YOU REMEMBER THAT BID? IT WASN’T THIS RACE FOR

  • IT WASN’T THIS RACE FOR PRESIDENT OR FOR CONGRESS, IT

  • PRESIDENT OR FOR CONGRESS, IT WAS A CONTEST TO RUN THE PARTY

  • WAS A CONTEST TO RUN THE PARTY ITSELF, THE TOP POST AT THE DNC

  • ITSELF, THE TOP POST AT THE DNC CHANGED HANDS AFTER RUSSIAN

  • CHANGED HANDS AFTER RUSSIAN HACKERS BOOSTING TRUMP HAD

  • HACKERS BOOSTING TRUMP HAD RELEASED STOLEN E-MAILS

  • RELEASED STOLEN E-MAILS UNDERCUTTING THEN DNC CHAIR DEB

  • UNDERCUTTING THEN DNC CHAIR DEB DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ AT THE

  • DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ AT THE 2016 CONVENTION.

  • 2016 CONVENTION. SHE RESIGNED, BAKE A TEMPORARY

  • SHE RESIGNED, BAKE A TEMPORARY CHAIR IN THAT ELECTION, LEAVING

  • CHAIR IN THAT ELECTION, LEAVING A VACANT SEAT, HOW TO FILL IN

  • A VACANT SEAT, HOW TO FILL IN JANUARY 2017.

  • JANUARY 2017. THE TOP CONTENDERS WERE FORMER

  • THE TOP CONTENDERS WERE FORMER OBAMA OFFICIAL, TOM PEREZ, WHO

  • OBAMA OFFICIAL, TOM PEREZ, WHO WON, LIBERAL CONGRESSMAN KEITH

  • WON, LIBERAL CONGRESSMAN KEITH ELLISON, BUT IN THAT PIVOTAL

  • ELLISON, BUT IN THAT PIVOTAL DEBATE OVER WHO SHOULD LEAD THE

  • DEBATE OVER WHO SHOULD LEAD THE PARTY IN THE WAKE OF TRUMP’S

  • PARTY IN THE WAKE OF TRUMP’S WIN, ANOTHER OBSCURE CANDIDATE

  • WIN, ANOTHER OBSCURE CANDIDATE JUMPED IN.

  • JUMPED IN. >> I’M PETE BUTTIGIEG, AND I’M

  • >> I’M PETE BUTTIGIEG, AND I’M THE MAYOR HERE IN SOUTH BEND,

  • THE MAYOR HERE IN SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, I’M ASKING YOU TO JOIN

  • INDIANA, I’M ASKING YOU TO JOIN ME AS I RUN FOR CHAIR OF THE

  • ME AS I RUN FOR CHAIR OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, AND TOGETHER

  • DEMOCRATIC PARTY, AND TOGETHER WE WILL WRITE A NEW TURN AROUND

  • WE WILL WRITE A NEW TURN AROUND STORY.

  • STORY. >> THAT OBSCURE MAYOR SAW

  • >> THAT OBSCURE MAYOR SAW HIMSELF AS THE PERSON TO TAKE ON

  • HIMSELF AS THE PERSON TO TAKE ON AND TAKE OVER THE REINS OF THE

  • AND TAKE OVER THE REINS OF THE PARTY FOR THE TRUMP ERA.

  • PARTY FOR THE TRUMP ERA. >> IF THE OUTCOME OF THIS DNC

  • >> IF THE OUTCOME OF THIS DNC CHAIR RACE IS THAT HALF THE

  • CHAIR RACE IS THAT HALF THE PARTY FEELS LIKE IT’S JUST BEEN

  • PARTY FEELS LIKE IT’S JUST BEEN SENT PACKING, WERE GOING TO BE

  • SENT PACKING, WERE GOING TO BE THAT MUCH FURTHER ON A BACK FOOT

  • THAT MUCH FURTHER ON A BACK FOOT DEALING WITH THE REAL OPPOSITION

  • DEALING WITH THE REAL OPPOSITION WHICH IS TRUMP AND THE

  • WHICH IS TRUMP AND THE REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION.

  • REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION. >> WHY WOULDN’T YOU PUT IN

  • >> WHY WOULDN’T YOU PUT IN SOMEBODY WHO’S FROM THE

  • SOMEBODY WHO’S FROM THE MILLENNIAL GENERATION, RUNNING

  • MILLENNIAL GENERATION, RUNNING AND WINNING IN A BRIGHT RED

  • AND WINNING IN A BRIGHT RED STATE LIKE INDIANA, AND A MAYOR

  • STATE LIKE INDIANA, AND A MAYOR WHOSE BREAD AND BUTTER IS STATE

  • WHOSE BREAD AND BUTTER IS STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL ORGANIZING.

  • AND LOCAL POLITICAL ORGANIZING. >> PARTY CHAIRS ARE USUALLY IN

  • >> PARTY CHAIRS ARE USUALLY IN AFFAIRS, 2017 WAS A LITTLE

  • AFFAIRS, 2017 WAS A LITTLE DIFFERENT.

  • DIFFERENT. THE PARTY LEADERSHIP WAS

  • THE PARTY LEADERSHIP WAS UNDERMINED BY SOME OF THE

  • UNDERMINED BY SOME OF THE CONTENT IN THE E-MAILS, HACKED

  • CONTENT IN THE E-MAILS, HACKED BY THE RUSSIANS AND SHOCKED BY

  • BY THE RUSSIANS AND SHOCKED BY TRUMP’S WIN, AND THERE WAS MORE

  • TRUMP’S WIN, AND THERE WAS MORE ATTENTION ON THE DNC RACE AS A

  • ATTENTION ON THE DNC RACE AS A PROXY ON HOW TO TAKE ON TRUMP.

  • PROXY ON HOW TO TAKE ON TRUMP. >> THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NEEDS TO

  • >> THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NEEDS TO TAKE THE FIGHT TO DONALD TRUMP.

  • TAKE THE FIGHT TO DONALD TRUMP. WHEN WE LEAD WITH OUR VALUES,

  • WHEN WE LEAD WITH OUR VALUES, WHEN WE LEAD WITH OUR

  • WHEN WE LEAD WITH OUR CONVICTION, THAT’S HOW WE

  • CONVICTION, THAT’S HOW WE SUCCEED.

  • SUCCEED. >> DONALD TRUMP HAS ALREADY

  • >> DONALD TRUMP HAS ALREADY BROUGHT FLAT OUR WAY.

  • BROUGHT FLAT OUR WAY. WE CAN ACTUALLY HELP DEMOCRATS

  • WE CAN ACTUALLY HELP DEMOCRATS WIN ALL OVER THE COUNTRY, SO

  • WIN ALL OVER THE COUNTRY, SO THAT WE CAN GET RID OF DONALD

  • THAT WE CAN GET RID OF DONALD TRUMP.

  • TRUMP. >> DONALD TRUMP’S GOTTEN TO BE

  • >> DONALD TRUMP’S GOTTEN TO BE LIKE A COMPUTER VIRUS IN THE

  • LIKE A COMPUTER VIRUS IN THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SYSTEM.

  • AMERICAN POLITICAL SYSTEM. HE TIES UP OUR MINDS AND OUR

  • HE TIES UP OUR MINDS AND OUR PROCESSING POWER WITH THESE

  • PROCESSING POWER WITH THESE EQUATIONS THAT DON’T EVEN HAVE

  • EQUATIONS THAT DON’T EVEN HAVE ANY SOLUTIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM

  • ANY SOLUTIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM OVERHEATS AND BREAKS DOWN.

  • OVERHEATS AND BREAKS DOWN. >> THAT RACE FOCUSED ON THOSE

  • >> THAT RACE FOCUSED ON THOSE FIRST TWO VOICES, AN OBAMA

  • FIRST TWO VOICES, AN OBAMA ESTABLISHMENT VETERAN, TOM

  • ESTABLISHMENT VETERAN, TOM PEREZ, KEITH ELLISON, MAYOR PETE

  • PEREZ, KEITH ELLISON, MAYOR PETE WAS VYING TO BE A KIND OF

  • WAS VYING TO BE A KIND OF COALITION COMPROMISE CANDIDATE

  • COALITION COMPROMISE CANDIDATE WHO COULD MAKE TALK TO BOTH

  • WHO COULD MAKE TALK TO BOTH THOSE WINGS OF THE PARTY AND

  • THOSE WINGS OF THE PARTY AND ALSO BRING OTHER ATTRIBUTES AS

  • ALSO BRING OTHER ATTRIBUTES AS AN OPENLY GUY MILLENNIAL MAYOR

  • AN OPENLY GUY MILLENNIAL MAYOR WITH CREDENTIALS FROM THE

  • WITH CREDENTIALS FROM THE MILITARY AND HARVARD.

  • MILITARY AND HARVARD. THAT RACE TURNED COMPLETELY ON

  • THAT RACE TURNED COMPLETELY ON THE 447 MEMBERS OF THE DNC WHO

  • THE 447 MEMBERS OF THE DNC WHO VOTE, BUT MAYOR PETE HAD AN

  • VOTE, BUT MAYOR PETE HAD AN APPROACH THAT APPEALED TO OTHER

  • APPROACH THAT APPEALED TO OTHER GROUPS THAT DIDN’T HAVE A VOTE,

  • GROUPS THAT DIDN’T HAVE A VOTE, INCLUDING SOME IN THE PRESS.

  • INCLUDING SOME IN THE PRESS. REPORTERS DUBBING HIM A ROCK

  • REPORTERS DUBBING HIM A ROCK STAR AT THE TIME WHO MIGHT HAVE

  • STAR AT THE TIME WHO MIGHT HAVE LACKED THE CREDIBILITY OF A

  • LACKED THE CREDIBILITY OF A SERIOUS CHALLENGER BUT RAISED

  • SERIOUS CHALLENGER BUT RAISED HIS NATIONAL PROFILE BY RUNNING.

  • HIS NATIONAL PROFILE BY RUNNING. HE DREW PRESS ATTENTION IN KEY

  • HE DREW PRESS ATTENTION IN KEY DEMOCRATIC STATES LIKE

  • DEMOCRATIC STATES LIKE CALIFORNIA, ONE COMPETITOR NOTED

  • CALIFORNIA, ONE COMPETITOR NOTED PETE COULD GO VIRAL, EVEN THOUGH

  • PETE COULD GO VIRAL, EVEN THOUGH HE HAD LESS ACTUAL VOTING

  • HE HAD LESS ACTUAL VOTING SUPPORT IN THE DNC.

  • SUPPORT IN THE DNC. HOW DID BUTTIGIEG ACTUALLY FARE

  • HOW DID BUTTIGIEG ACTUALLY FARE IN THAT RACE, WE KNOW HE LOST

  • IN THAT RACE, WE KNOW HE LOST BECAUSE IT’S CHAIRMAN TOM PEREZ

  • BECAUSE IT’S CHAIRMAN TOM PEREZ WE SEE ON THAT STAGE,

  • WE SEE ON THAT STAGE, INTRODUCING THESE DEBATES THIS

  • INTRODUCING THESE DEBATES THIS YEAR WITH BUTTIGIEG OVER AT THE

  • YEAR WITH BUTTIGIEG OVER AT THE LECTERN WITH THE CANDIDATES, BUT

  • LECTERN WITH THE CANDIDATES, BUT HOW DID HE LOSE, WAS IT CLOSE,

  • HOW DID HE LOSE, WAS IT CLOSE, DID HE HAVE A WING IN THE PARTY,

  • DID HE HAVE A WING IN THE PARTY, 20%, 10?

  • 20%, 10? NO, BUTTIGIEG DRAMATICALLY

  • NO, BUTTIGIEG DRAMATICALLY DROPPED OUT OF THE RACE THE VERY

  • DROPPED OUT OF THE RACE THE VERY MORNING OF THAT VOTE.

  • MORNING OF THAT VOTE. >> THIS GUY NAMED PETE WHOSE

  • >> THIS GUY NAMED PETE WHOSE LAST NAME NOBODY CAN PRONOUNCE,

  • LAST NAME NOBODY CAN PRONOUNCE, THE MAYOR OF SOUTH BEND,

  • THE MAYOR OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, WAS GOING TO SOME HOW

  • INDIANA, WAS GOING TO SOME HOW TAKE THE DNC BY STORM AND

  • TAKE THE DNC BY STORM AND SURPRISE EVERYBODY.

  • SURPRISE EVERYBODY. HE WITHDRAWS DURING HIS

  • HE WITHDRAWS DURING HIS NOMINATION.

  • NOMINATION. >> HE WAS GOING TO BE THE GUY.

  • >> HE WAS GOING TO BE THE GUY. >> AND THE PARTY WENT WITH PEREZ

  • >> AND THE PARTY WENT WITH PEREZ OVER ELLISON, 235 TO 200.

  • OVER ELLISON, 235 TO 200. POLITICO REPORTED BUTTIGIEG DID

  • POLITICO REPORTED BUTTIGIEG DID THE MATH, HE DIDN’T HAVE THE

  • THE MATH, HE DIDN’T HAVE THE NEEDED SUPPORT AND SO HE DIDN’T

  • NEEDED SUPPORT AND SO HE DIDN’T STAY IN THE RACE.

  • STAY IN THE RACE. THAT WAS BUTTIGIEG’S LAST BIG

  • THAT WAS BUTTIGIEG’S LAST BIG CAMPAIGN.

  • CAMPAIGN. TODAY, MANY DEMOCRATS MIGHT NOT

  • TODAY, MANY DEMOCRATS MIGHT NOT EVEN REMEMBER IT BUT WHAT DOES

  • EVEN REMEMBER IT BUT WHAT DOES IT REVEAL ABOUT HIM AND HIS

  • IT REVEAL ABOUT HIM AND HIS CANDIDACY.

  • CANDIDACY. FIRST, EVEN WITH WIDE AGREEMENT,

  • FIRST, EVEN WITH WIDE AGREEMENT, HE WAS NEW AND LESS EXPERIENCED

  • HE WAS NEW AND LESS EXPERIENCED BUT MAYOR PETE DID FIND WAYS TO

  • BUT MAYOR PETE DID FIND WAYS TO BREAKTHROUGH AND WIN OVER PARTY

  • BREAKTHROUGH AND WIN OVER PARTY ELITES, THAT WAS PART OF HIS

  • ELITES, THAT WAS PART OF HIS BUZZ IN 2017, PART OF HIS

  • BUZZ IN 2017, PART OF HIS FUNDRAISING NOW.

  • FUNDRAISING NOW. THE SECOND THING IS SOMETHING

  • THE SECOND THING IS SOMETHING THAT DOES APPLY TO ALL KINDS OF

  • THAT DOES APPLY TO ALL KINDS OF POLITICIANS BUT IS PRONOUNCED

  • POLITICIANS BUT IS PRONOUNCED HERE.

  • HERE. HE IS AMBITIOUSLY AUDACIOUS.

  • HE IS AMBITIOUSLY AUDACIOUS. WHEN MAYOR PETE JUMPED IN THE

  • WHEN MAYOR PETE JUMPED IN THE RACE IN 2017, HE DIDN’T HAVE THE

  • RACE IN 2017, HE DIDN’T HAVE THE PROMINENCE OF EXPERIENCE

  • PROMINENCE OF EXPERIENCE TRADITIONALLY REQUIRED TO RUN A

  • TRADITIONALLY REQUIRED TO RUN A PARTY, TAKING ON A NEW

  • PARTY, TAKING ON A NEW PRESIDENT.

  • PRESIDENT. BY THE END OF THE RACE, DNC

  • BY THE END OF THE RACE, DNC VOTERS STILL DIDN’T THINK HE HAD

  • VOTERS STILL DIDN’T THINK HE HAD IT BUT HE’S THE ONE NOW RUNNING

  • IT BUT HE’S THE ONE NOW RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

  • FOR PRESIDENT. THINK ABOUT THAT, AND CONTRAST

  • THINK ABOUT THAT, AND CONTRAST IT TO THESE OTHER DEMOCRATS IN

  • IT TO THESE OTHER DEMOCRATS IN THE RACE.

  • THE RACE. PEREZ WON AND IS RUNNING THE

  • PEREZ WON AND IS RUNNING THE PARTY, NOT SEEKING A PROMOTION

  • PARTY, NOT SEEKING A PROMOTION TO THE WHITE HOUSE.

  • TO THE WHITE HOUSE. ELLISON, A MEMBER OF CONGRESS

  • ELLISON, A MEMBER OF CONGRESS LOST AND DIDN’T SEEK THE WHITE

  • LOST AND DIDN’T SEEK THE WHITE HOUSE, HE WENT ON TO BECOME

  • HOUSE, HE WENT ON TO BECOME MINNESOTA ASSET ATTORNEY

  • MINNESOTA ASSET ATTORNEY GENERAL.

  • GENERAL. JAMIE HARRISON, AS STATE PARTY

  • JAMIE HARRISON, AS STATE PARTY CHAIR LOST, AND IS RUNNING FOR

  • CHAIR LOST, AND IS RUNNING FOR SENATE, HE WAS ON THE SHOW

  • SENATE, HE WAS ON THE SHOW TONIGHT BY COINCIDENCE,

  • TONIGHT BY COINCIDENCE, BUTTIGIEG DECIDED THE NEXT STEP

  • BUTTIGIEG DECIDED THE NEXT STEP WASN’T RUNNING FOR STATE OFFICE

  • WASN’T RUNNING FOR STATE OFFICE OR SENATE, BUT RUNNING FOR

  • OR SENATE, BUT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

  • PRESIDENT. NO ONE ELSE IN THAT RACE THOUGHT

  • NO ONE ELSE IN THAT RACE THOUGHT THEIR NEXT MOVE SHOULD BE THE

  • THEIR NEXT MOVE SHOULD BE THE WHITE HOUSE, NOT EVEN THE

  • WHITE HOUSE, NOT EVEN THE 55-YEAR-OLD FORMER CANDIDATE

  • 55-YEAR-OLD FORMER CANDIDATE OFFICIAL WHO WON THAT RACE, NO

  • OFFICIAL WHO WON THAT RACE, NO ONE EXCEPT MAYOR PETE.

  • ONE EXCEPT MAYOR PETE. NOW, WHAT ARE WE TO MAKE OF THAT

  • NOW, WHAT ARE WE TO MAKE OF THAT AMBITION, WHO GETS BEAT AT ONE

  • AMBITION, WHO GETS BEAT AT ONE RACE, AND INSTEAD OF TAKING TIME

  • RACE, AND INSTEAD OF TAKING TIME OR RUNNING FOR THE JOB AGAIN,

  • OR RUNNING FOR THE JOB AGAIN, JUMPS AHEAD TO RUN FOR A

  • JUMPS AHEAD TO RUN FOR A PROMOTION FOR A MUCH LARGER JOB

  • PROMOTION FOR A MUCH LARGER JOB AND IS THAT SOMEONE YOU WANT TO

  • AND IS THAT SOMEONE YOU WANT TO BE PRESIDENT?

  • BE PRESIDENT? WELL, LET’S NOT ANSWER TOO

  • WELL, LET’S NOT ANSWER TOO QUICKLY.

  • QUICKLY. BECAUSE THAT IS A KIND OF

  • BECAUSE THAT IS A KIND OF POLITICAL AUDACITY THAT MADE ITS

  • POLITICAL AUDACITY THAT MADE ITS WAY TO THE WHITE HOUSE BEFORE,

  • WAY TO THE WHITE HOUSE BEFORE, ALL STARTING WHEN AN OBSCURE

  • ALL STARTING WHEN AN OBSCURE POLITICIAN HOLDING A SMALLER JOB

  • POLITICIAN HOLDING A SMALLER JOB FOR MAYOR RAN FOR OFFICE AND

  • FOR MAYOR RAN FOR OFFICE AND LOST, ONLY TO SEEK HIGHER

  • LOST, ONLY TO SEEK HIGHER OFFICE.

  • OFFICE. HIS QUEST BEGAN WITH A LONG SHOT

  • HIS QUEST BEGAN WITH A LONG SHOT PRIMARY AGAINST AN INCUMBENT

  • PRIMARY AGAINST AN INCUMBENT CONGRESSMAN, BOBBY RUSH, OBAMA

  • CONGRESSMAN, BOBBY RUSH, OBAMA DEBATING HIS ELDER AND FACING

  • DEBATING HIS ELDER AND FACING SKEPTICISM.

  • SKEPTICISM. >> I THINK THAT SENIORITY IS

  • >> I THINK THAT SENIORITY IS IMPORTANT BUT I THINK VISION AND

  • IMPORTANT BUT I THINK VISION AND IMAGINATION AND HARD WORK IS

  • IMAGINATION AND HARD WORK IS MORE IMPORTANT.

  • MORE IMPORTANT. >> SENATOR BARACK, HE

  • >> SENATOR BARACK, HE REPRESENTS, HIS DISTRICT HAS

  • REPRESENTS, HIS DISTRICT HAS ALWAYS BEEN IN ENGLEWOOD.

  • ALWAYS BEEN IN ENGLEWOOD. WHAT HAS HE GOT.

  • WHAT HAS HE GOT. >> I CAN TELL YOU.

  • >> I CAN TELL YOU. >> ALL OF A SUDDEN HE CAN DO A

  • >> ALL OF A SUDDEN HE CAN DO A BETTER JOB.

  • BETTER JOB. >> THAT MAY LOOK LIKE A

  • >> THAT MAY LOOK LIKE A DIFFERENT OBAMA THAN MANY SEE

  • DIFFERENT OBAMA THAN MANY SEE TODAY, AN ACCOMPLISHED FORMER

  • TODAY, AN ACCOMPLISHED FORMER PRESIDENT.

  • PRESIDENT. THIS WAS A YOUNG ASPIRING

  • THIS WAS A YOUNG ASPIRING POLITICIAN THAT FEW THOUGHT

  • POLITICIAN THAT FEW THOUGHT WOULD MAKE IT TO CONGRESS, LET

  • WOULD MAKE IT TO CONGRESS, LET ALONE THE WHITE HOUSE, DOING THE

  • ALONE THE WHITE HOUSE, DOING THE LOCAL LEG WORK AND OUTREACH THAT

  • LOCAL LEG WORK AND OUTREACH THAT SMALL TIME POLLS DO.

  • SMALL TIME POLLS DO. >> YOU KNOW, THAT IS ONE OF THE

  • >> YOU KNOW, THAT IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I LIKE ABOUT THIS

  • THINGS THAT I LIKE ABOUT THIS PLACE, THE PRICES ARE RIGHT AND

  • PLACE, THE PRICES ARE RIGHT AND THE PORTIONS ARE GOOD.

  • THE PORTIONS ARE GOOD. >> I ORDERED THE SOUTHERN

  • >> I ORDERED THE SOUTHERN SAMPLER JUST BECAUSE I COULDN’T

  • SAMPLER JUST BECAUSE I COULDN’T MAKE UP MY MIND.

  • MAKE UP MY MIND. I DO HAVE TO PUT IN A PLUG FOR

  • I DO HAVE TO PUT IN A PLUG FOR THEIR PEACH COBBLER, WHICH

  • THEIR PEACH COBBLER, WHICH PEOPLE TEND TO GOBBLE UP.

  • PEOPLE TEND TO GOBBLE UP. >> FACT CHECK, THAT COBBLER DOES

  • >> FACT CHECK, THAT COBBLER DOES LOOK GOOD.

  • LOOK GOOD. OBAMA SPENT THOSE YEARS DOING

  • OBAMA SPENT THOSE YEARS DOING NORMAL REACH OUT POLITICS AND

  • NORMAL REACH OUT POLITICS AND MADE A GENERATIONAL CHALLENGE TO

  • MADE A GENERATIONAL CHALLENGE TO CONGRESSMAN RUSH, BUT IT DIDN’T

  • CONGRESSMAN RUSH, BUT IT DIDN’T MOVE THE DEMOCRATS IN ILLINOIS,

  • MOVE THE DEMOCRATS IN ILLINOIS, RUSH BEAT OBAMA IN A LANDSLIDE.

  • RUSH BEAT OBAMA IN A LANDSLIDE. PEOPLE CONCLUDED OBAMA WAS QUOTE

  • PEOPLE CONCLUDED OBAMA WAS QUOTE TOO MINOR LEAGUE, OVEREDUCATED,

  • TOO MINOR LEAGUE, OVEREDUCATED, ARROGANT, STIFF, AND OBAMA

  • ARROGANT, STIFF, AND OBAMA DIDN’T TAKE THAT LOSS BY JUST

  • DIDN’T TAKE THAT LOSS BY JUST RUNNING FOR THE SAME SEAT AGAIN

  • RUNNING FOR THE SAME SEAT AGAIN OR SOME OTHER COMPARABLE OFFICE.

  • OR SOME OTHER COMPARABLE OFFICE. HE TOOK THAT LOSS AS A SIGN TO

  • HE TOOK THAT LOSS AS A SIGN TO THINK BIGGER AND RUN FOR A MORE

  • THINK BIGGER AND RUN FOR A MORE EXPENSIVE AND HIGHER OFFICE, THE

  • EXPENSIVE AND HIGHER OFFICE, THE U.S. SENATE.

  • U.S. SENATE. >> EVERYBODY RIGHT NOW FEELS

  • >> EVERYBODY RIGHT NOW FEELS CYNICAL ABOUT THE POLITICAL

  • CYNICAL ABOUT THE POLITICAL PROCESS.

  • PROCESS. I THINK THAT THEIR LEADERSHIP

  • I THINK THAT THEIR LEADERSHIP SEEMS LONG ON RHETORIC BUT SHORT

  • SEEMS LONG ON RHETORIC BUT SHORT ON SUBSTANCE, POLITICS SEEMS TO

  • ON SUBSTANCE, POLITICS SEEMS TO BE MORE OF A BUSINESS THAN A

  • BE MORE OF A BUSINESS THAN A MISSION.

  • MISSION. THERE’S A SENSE THAT POWER

  • THERE’S A SENSE THAT POWER ALWAYS TRUMPS PRINCIPAL, BUT I

  • ALWAYS TRUMPS PRINCIPAL, BUT I TRULY BELIEVE THERE’S ANOTHER

  • TRULY BELIEVE THERE’S ANOTHER TRADITION IN THIS COUNTRY THAT

  • TRADITION IN THIS COUNTRY THAT SAYS THAT WERE ALL CONNECTED

  • SAYS THAT WERE ALL CONNECTED SOMEHOW.

  • SOMEHOW. >> I’M BARACK OBAMA, I’M RUNNING

  • >> I’M BARACK OBAMA, I’M RUNNING FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE AND

  • FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE AND I APROVEREDPROVE THIS MESSAGE TO

  • I APROVEREDPROVE THIS MESSAGE TO YES, WE CAN.

  • YES, WE CAN. >> YES, WE CAN, THOSE WORDS MAY

  • >> YES, WE CAN, THOSE WORDS MAY ECHO IN OUR MINDS AS A PATH TO

  • ECHO IN OUR MINDS AS A PATH TO THE WHITE HOUSE, AT THE TIME,

  • THE WHITE HOUSE, AT THE TIME, LOCAL POLITICOS WERE DISMISSIVE

  • LOCAL POLITICOS WERE DISMISSIVE OF OBAMA SEEKING A PROMOTION

  • OF OBAMA SEEKING A PROMOTION AFTER A LOSS, NOTING THERE WAS

  • AFTER A LOSS, NOTING THERE WAS LITTLE REASON TO THINK THE

  • LITTLE REASON TO THINK THE OBSCURE, STATE SENATOR WOULD

  • OBSCURE, STATE SENATOR WOULD PREVAIL.

  • PREVAIL. OBAMA BELIEVED YOU COULD LOSE

  • OBAMA BELIEVED YOU COULD LOSE SMALL BEFORE WINNING BIG, IF YOU

  • SMALL BEFORE WINNING BIG, IF YOU PROVE YOUR SUBSTANCE TO VOTERS

  • PROVE YOUR SUBSTANCE TO VOTERS AND OFFER MORE IN YOUR NEXT RACE

  • AND OFFER MORE IN YOUR NEXT RACE THAN MERE AMBITION.

  • THAN MERE AMBITION. HE WAS CERTAINLY TAKING A LEAP

  • HE WAS CERTAINLY TAKING A LEAP TRYING TO GET A BOUNCE OUT OF A

  • TRYING TO GET A BOUNCE OUT OF A PRIMARY LOSS TO GO TO THE

  • PRIMARY LOSS TO GO TO THE SENATE.

  • SENATE. I’LL VOTERS FOUND HE HAD MORE

  • I’LL VOTERS FOUND HE HAD MORE THAN JUST POLITICAL DREAMS.

  • THAN JUST POLITICAL DREAMS. HIS STANCE AGAINST THE IRAQ WAR

  • HIS STANCE AGAINST THE IRAQ WAR IN CONTRAST TO THE PARTY’S

  • IN CONTRAST TO THE PARTY’S NOMINEE THAT YEAR, JOHN KERRY

  • NOMINEE THAT YEAR, JOHN KERRY SUGGESTED THERE WERE AT LEAST

  • SUGGESTED THERE WERE AT LEAST SOME THINGS HE WOULDN’T

  • SOME THINGS HE WOULDN’T SACRIFICE FOR SHORT-TERM

  • SACRIFICE FOR SHORT-TERM AMBITION.

  • AMBITION. HE MADE AN EXPERIENCED PLUS BY

  • HE MADE AN EXPERIENCED PLUS BY ARGUING AGAINST POLITICS AS

  • ARGUING AGAINST POLITICS AS USUAL AND PARTISANSHIP.

  • USUAL AND PARTISANSHIP. SOUND FAMILIAR?

  • SOUND FAMILIAR? NOW HE WAS ALSO, WE SHOULD NOTE

  • NOW HE WAS ALSO, WE SHOULD NOTE IF YOU WANT TO DO THE ANALYSIS,

  • IF YOU WANT TO DO THE ANALYSIS, HE WAS BLESSED IN THAT’ 0 4

  • HE WAS BLESSED IN THAT’ 0 4 RACE, ONE -- ’04 RACE, ONE

  • RACE, ONE -- ’04 RACE, ONE IMPLODED, REPLACED BY ALLEN

  • IMPLODED, REPLACED BY ALLEN KEYS.

  • KEYS. MAYOR PETE IS TAKING A LEAP,

  • MAYOR PETE IS TAKING A LEAP, TELLING DEMOCRATS WHO REJECTED

  • TELLING DEMOCRATS WHO REJECTED HIM TO RUN THE PARTY THAT HE

  • HIM TO RUN THE PARTY THAT HE SHOULD NOW RUN THE COUNTRY JUST

  • SHOULD NOW RUN THE COUNTRY JUST TWO YEARS LATER, AND HE, TO BE

  • TWO YEARS LATER, AND HE, TO BE CLEAR, HAS LESS CONGRESSIONAL

  • CLEAR, HAS LESS CONGRESSIONAL EXPERIENCE THAN OBAMA DID WHEN

  • EXPERIENCE THAN OBAMA DID WHEN HE RAN FOR THE WHITE HOUSE.

  • HE RAN FOR THE WHITE HOUSE. BOTH THESE CANDIDATES ARE

  • BOTH THESE CANDIDATES ARE LEANING INTO GENERATION CHANGE,

  • LEANING INTO GENERATION CHANGE, THOUGH, AS AN APPEAL TO PEOPLE

  • THOUGH, AS AN APPEAL TO PEOPLE WHO ARE SICK OF THE WAY THINGS

  • WHO ARE SICK OF THE WAY THINGS ARE RUNNING NOW.

  • ARE RUNNING NOW. >> THE TIME IS NOW TO SHAKE OFF

  • >> THE TIME IS NOW TO SHAKE OFF OUR SLUMBER, AND SLOUGH OFF OUR

  • OUR SLUMBER, AND SLOUGH OFF OUR FEARS AND NAKMAKE GOOD ON THE DE

  • FEARS AND NAKMAKE GOOD ON THE DE WE OWE PAST AND FUTURE

  • WE OWE PAST AND FUTURE GENERATIONS, TODAY, TOGETHER, WE

  • GENERATIONS, TODAY, TOGETHER, WE CAN FINISH THE WORK THAT NEEDS

  • CAN FINISH THE WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE, AND USHER IN A NEW

  • TO BE DONE, AND USHER IN A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM ON THIS EARTH.

  • BIRTH OF FREEDOM ON THIS EARTH. >> YOU AND I HAVE THE CHANCE TO

  • >> YOU AND I HAVE THE CHANCE TO USHER IN A NEW AMERICAN SPRING.

  • USHER IN A NEW AMERICAN SPRING. SO WITH HOPE IN OUR HEARTS AND

  • SO WITH HOPE IN OUR HEARTS AND WITH FIRE IN OUR BELLY, LET’S

  • WITH FIRE IN OUR BELLY, LET’S GET TO WORK, AND LET’S MAKE

  • GET TO WORK, AND LET’S MAKE HISTORY.

  • HISTORY. THANK YOU.

  • THANK YOU. >> THE POINT HERE IS NOT THAT

  • >> THE POINT HERE IS NOT THAT MAYOR PETE’S FUTURE WILL FOLLOW

  • MAYOR PETE’S FUTURE WILL FOLLOW OBAMA’S PAST.

  • OBAMA’S PAST. NOBODY KNOWS.

  • NOBODY KNOWS. THE VOTERS, YOU, WILL DECIDE

  • THE VOTERS, YOU, WILL DECIDE WHETHER TO REWARD OR PUNISH PETE

  • WHETHER TO REWARD OR PUNISH PETE OR ANY OTHER POLITICIAN’S

  • OR ANY OTHER POLITICIAN’S AMBITION.

  • AMBITION. WE KNOW THAT EVEN HUGE AMBITION

  • WE KNOW THAT EVEN HUGE AMBITION TAKING A LOSS AS A SIGN YOU

  • TAKING A LOSS AS A SIGN YOU SHOULD GET A PROMOTION IS NOT

  • SHOULD GET A PROMOTION IS NOT ALWAYS SEEN AS DISQUALIFYING BY

  • ALWAYS SEEN AS DISQUALIFYING BY THE VOTERS AND SOMETIMES VOTERS

  • THE VOTERS AND SOMETIMES VOTERS EMBRACE A CALL TO BLOW UP THE

  • EMBRACE A CALL TO BLOW UP THE WAY THINGS ARE RUN WHEN IT’S

  • WAY THINGS ARE RUN WHEN IT’S OFFERED BY NEW PEOPLE WHO HAVE

>>> TONIGHT WE ARE LAUNCHING A

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

ピート・ブッタギグ市長はトランプ氏を倒すための「オバマ路線」を持っているのか?| MSNBC|アリ・メルバーとのビート|MSNBC (Does Mayor Pete Buttigieg Have An “Obama Path” To Beating Trump? | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC)

  • 2 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語