Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • BOGUS. >> Martha: SENATOR HAWLEY,

  • >> Martha: SENATOR HAWLEY, THANK YOU.

  • THANK YOU. ALWAYS GOOD TO SEE YOU.

  • ALWAYS GOOD TO SEE YOU. JOINING ME NOW, TREY GOWDY NELLY

  • JOINING ME NOW, TREY GOWDY NELLY FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR.

  • FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE

  • THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TONIGHT.

  • TONIGHT. GOOD TO SEE YOU.

  • GOOD TO SEE YOU. IS IT OKAY FOR RAND PAUL TO

  • IS IT OKAY FOR RAND PAUL TO MENTION THE NAME IN HIS TWEET

  • MENTION THE NAME IN HIS TWEET TODAY.

  • TODAY. HE SAID HE MENTIONED A NAME,

  • HE SAID HE MENTIONED A NAME, KNOWS WHETHER OR NOT THE PERSON

  • KNOWS WHETHER OR NOT THE PERSON IS WHISTLE-BLOWER BUT WANTS TO

  • IS WHISTLE-BLOWER BUT WANTS TO KNOW ABOUT THAT PERSON’S

  • KNOW ABOUT THAT PERSON’S POTENTIAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE

  • POTENTIAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE BEGINNING OF ALL THIS.

  • BEGINNING OF ALL THIS. >> MARTHA, I ACTUALLY THINK BOTH

  • >> MARTHA, I ACTUALLY THINK BOTH SIDES ARE WRONG IN THE SPIRIT WE

  • SIDES ARE WRONG IN THE SPIRIT WE MAKE 4-YEAR-OLDS TESTIFY IN

  • MAKE 4-YEAR-OLDS TESTIFY IN COURT.

  • COURT. WE MAKE WOMEN WHO WERE SEXUALLY

  • WE MAKE WOMEN WHO WERE SEXUALLY ASSAULTED IN COURT.

  • ASSAULTED IN COURT. YOU COULD ESCAPE THE

  • YOU COULD ESCAPE THE CROSS-EXAMINE, WE DON’T DO IT

  • CROSS-EXAMINE, WE DON’T DO IT FOR ANYONE ELSE, WHY THIS

  • FOR ANYONE ELSE, WHY THIS WHISTLE-BLOWER?

  • WHISTLE-BLOWER? THE OTHER THING, ABOUT THIS

  • THE OTHER THING, ABOUT THIS WHISTLE-BLOWER, I DON’T NEED

  • WHISTLE-BLOWER, I DON’T NEED HIM!

  • HIM! WHY DO I CARE SOMEONE WHO

  • WHY DO I CARE SOMEONE WHO OVERHEARD THE CONVERSATION FELT

  • OVERHEARD THE CONVERSATION FELT ABOUT IT OR THOUGHT ABOUT IT OR

  • ABOUT IT OR THOUGHT ABOUT IT OR BELIEVED ABOUT IT.

  • BELIEVED ABOUT IT. I CAN READ IT FOR MYSELF.

  • I CAN READ IT FOR MYSELF. THE WHISTLE-BLOWER IS RELEVANT

  • THE WHISTLE-BLOWER IS RELEVANT BUT HE’S NOT MATERIAL AND THERE

  • BUT HE’S NOT MATERIAL AND THERE ARE PLENTY OF WITNESSES I THINK

  • ARE PLENTY OF WITNESSES I THINK WOULD BE MORE PROBATIVE THAN THE

  • WOULD BE MORE PROBATIVE THAN THE WHISTLE-BLOWER OF A TRANSCRIPT

  • WHISTLE-BLOWER OF A TRANSCRIPT YOU AND I CAN READ OURSELVES.

  • YOU AND I CAN READ OURSELVES. >> Martha: TO THE POINT THAT I

  • >> Martha: TO THE POINT THAT I HAD BEEN TALKED ABOUT EARLIER,

  • HAD BEEN TALKED ABOUT EARLIER, PUSHED OPEN A PROCESS THAT

  • PUSHED OPEN A PROCESS THAT VIOLATES THE ISSUE OF THE

  • VIOLATES THE ISSUE OF THE PRESIDENT’S RIGHT TO HAVE

  • PRESIDENT’S RIGHT TO HAVE DISCUSSIONS THAT ARE NOT PUBLIC,

  • DISCUSSIONS THAT ARE NOT PUBLIC, PUSHED OUT IN THE PUBLIC, EVEN

  • PUSHED OUT IN THE PUBLIC, EVEN THOUGH HE KNOWS OR KNEW AT THAT

  • THOUGH HE KNOWS OR KNEW AT THAT TIME THERE WERE MANY PEOPLE ON

  • TIME THERE WERE MANY PEOPLE ON THE CALL BUT THEY ARE IN THE

  • THE CALL BUT THEY ARE IN THE CIRCLE FOR THAT REASON.

  • CIRCLE FOR THAT REASON. ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT THE

  • ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT THE PRECEDENT THAT’S BEEN SET WITH

  • PRECEDENT THAT’S BEEN SET WITH THAT WITH ALL OF THIS?

  • THAT WITH ALL OF THIS? >> THE REMEDY OF THAT IS TO

  • >> THE REMEDY OF THAT IS TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON

  • LIMIT THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON THOSE CALLS.

  • THOSE CALLS. THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES ANYBODY

  • THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES ANYBODY TAKES UNPRECEDENTED ACTS, IF YOU

  • TAKES UNPRECEDENTED ACTS, IF YOU LISTEN TO A CONVERSATION OF A

  • LISTEN TO A CONVERSATION OF A PRESIDENT AND THE LEADER OF

  • PRESIDENT AND THE LEADER OF ANOTHER COUNTRY AND THEN YOU

  • ANOTHER COUNTRY AND THEN YOU VOIDED TO NULLIFY THAT

  • VOIDED TO NULLIFY THAT CONFIDENCE AND TELL SOMEBODY

  • CONFIDENCE AND TELL SOMEBODY ABOUT IT, THE PRESIDENT SHOULD

  • ABOUT IT, THE PRESIDENT SHOULD SHRINK THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON

  • SHRINK THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON THE CULPRIT THAT’S THE REMEDY OF

  • THE CULPRIT THAT’S THE REMEDY OF THAT.

  • THAT. LET ME TELL YOU WHAT, A DOZEN

  • LET ME TELL YOU WHAT, A DOZEN PEOPLE OUT OF THIS CALL, DO YOU

  • PEOPLE OUT OF THIS CALL, DO YOU REALLY NEED A DOZEN PEOPLE TO

  • REALLY NEED A DOZEN PEOPLE TO TAKE NOTES?

  • TAKE NOTES? >> TAKE IT TO A VOTE ON

  • >> TAKE IT TO A VOTE ON WITNESSES?

  • WITNESSES? >> YOU KNOW, MARTHA, I TALKED TO

  • >> YOU KNOW, MARTHA, I TALKED TO MY SENATE BUDDIES ON THE WAY

  • MY SENATE BUDDIES ON THE WAY OVER TONIGHT IN MY TRUCK ON THE

  • OVER TONIGHT IN MY TRUCK ON THE CELL PHONE.

  • CELL PHONE. I’M NOT CONVINCED THAT THEY HAVE

  • I’M NOT CONVINCED THAT THEY HAVE THE VOTES FOR WITNESSES.

  • THE VOTES FOR WITNESSES. I THINK THAT’S STILL VERY MUCH

  • I THINK THAT’S STILL VERY MUCH UP IN THE AIR AND I THINK MY

  • UP IN THE AIR AND I THINK MY REPUBLICAN FRIENDS IN THE SENATE

  • REPUBLICAN FRIENDS IN THE SENATE ARE WORRIED THAT THEY -- SOME

  • ARE WORRIED THAT THEY -- SOME FOLKS MAY VOTE FOR BOLTON AND NO

  • FOLKS MAY VOTE FOR BOLTON AND NO FOCUS ON THE OTHER SIDE.

  • FOCUS ON THE OTHER SIDE. THAT MAY BE AN UNMITIGATED

  • THAT MAY BE AN UNMITIGATED DISASTER FOR REPUBLICANS.

  • DISASTER FOR REPUBLICANS. IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE BOLTON

  • IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE BOLTON AND HAVE HUNTER BIDEN, IF YOU

  • AND HAVE HUNTER BIDEN, IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE MULVANEY, YOU

  • ARE GOING TO HAVE MULVANEY, YOU ARE GOING TO NEED JOE BIDEN.

  • ARE GOING TO NEED JOE BIDEN. THE NOTION THAT YOURE GOING TO

  • THE NOTION THAT YOURE GOING TO HAVE THE HOUSE WHO COULDVE

  • HAVE THE HOUSE WHO COULDVE CALLED ALL OF THEIR WITNESSES,

  • CALLED ALL OF THEIR WITNESSES, BUT DID NOT, WE ARE GOING TO

  • BUT DID NOT, WE ARE GOING TO REWARD THAT WITH AN APPEARANCE

  • REWARD THAT WITH AN APPEARANCE IN THE SENATE?

  • IN THE SENATE? I WOULD JUST CAUTION MY

  • I WOULD JUST CAUTION MY REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES IN THE

  • REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES IN THE SENATE, DO NOT FALL FOR THAT HE

  • SENATE, DO NOT FALL FOR THAT HE WOULD EITHER HAVE NO WITNESSES

  • WOULD EITHER HAVE NO WITNESSES OR HAVE SOME PARITY AMONG THE

  • OR HAVE SOME PARITY AMONG THE WITNESSES.

  • WITNESSES. I DO NOT THINK IT’S A FOREGONE

  • I DO NOT THINK IT’S A FOREGONE ASSURANCE THAT THEY WILL NOT

  • ASSURANCE THAT THEY WILL NOT VOTE TO HAVE WITNESSES.

  • VOTE TO HAVE WITNESSES. NOT YET.

  • NOT YET. >> Martha: INTERESTING.

  • >> Martha: INTERESTING. EVEN SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM

  • EVEN SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM SOUNDING PRETTY CONFIDENT ABOUT

  • SOUNDING PRETTY CONFIDENT ABOUT ALL OF THIS.

  • ALL OF THIS. SENATOR McCONNELL SEEMS TO

  • SENATOR McCONNELL SEEMS TO HAVE MORE OF A SPRING IN A STEP

  • HAVE MORE OF A SPRING IN A STEP THAT HE DID YESTERDAY ON THIS

  • THAT HE DID YESTERDAY ON THIS ISSUE, ARE THERE SPECIFIC

  • ISSUE, ARE THERE SPECIFIC SENATORS YOU ARE GETTING WORD OR

  • SENATORS YOU ARE GETTING WORD OR MAYBE NOT SURE AT THIS POINT?

  • MAYBE NOT SURE AT THIS POINT? COLLINS?

  • COLLINS? LAMAR ALEXANDER?

  • LAMAR ALEXANDER? >> I MEAN, ROMNEY FOR SURE.

  • >> I MEAN, ROMNEY FOR SURE. MAKOWSKI, COLLINS.

  • MAKOWSKI, COLLINS. I THINK YOU GET A SENSE OF THE

  • I THINK YOU GET A SENSE OF THE QUESTIONS BEING ASKED.

  • QUESTIONS BEING ASKED. MOST OF THE QUESTIONS ARE

  • MOST OF THE QUESTIONS ARE LEADING ANSWERS DOWN THE

  • LEADING ANSWERS DOWN THE QUESTIONS THAT ASSUME THE ANSWER

  • QUESTIONS THAT ASSUME THE ANSWER BUT THERE ARE SOME SENATORS THAT

  • BUT THERE ARE SOME SENATORS THAT ARE REALLY ASKING A LEGITIMATE,

  • ARE REALLY ASKING A LEGITIMATE, DIRECT OPEN QUESTION.

  • DIRECT OPEN QUESTION. SOLICITING MORE INFORMATION.

  • SOLICITING MORE INFORMATION. TO THE EXTENT THOSE ARE

  • TO THE EXTENT THOSE ARE REPUBLICANS AND I’VE HEARD IT

  • REPUBLICANS AND I’VE HEARD IT FROM COLLINS, I’VE HEARD FROM

  • FROM COLLINS, I’VE HEARD FROM MURKOWSKI --

  • MURKOWSKI -- BE WHEN THERE IS A QUESTION BY

  • BE WHEN THERE IS A QUESTION BY COLLINS AND MURKOWSKI

  • COLLINS AND MURKOWSKI ASKING IF THE PRESIDENT HAD DISC

  • ASKING IF THE PRESIDENT HAD DISC THE BIDENS WITH REGARDS TO THE

  • THE BIDENS WITH REGARDS TO THE LARGER ISSUE OF CORRUPTION AND

  • LARGER ISSUE OF CORRUPTION AND WHEN THE FIRST TIME THAT CAME

  • WHEN THE FIRST TIME THAT CAME UP.

  • UP. IS THAT THE QUESTION YOU SAW AS

  • IS THAT THE QUESTION YOU SAW AS A RED FLAG?

  • A RED FLAG? >> THERE WAS ANOTHER QUESTION

  • >> THERE WAS ANOTHER QUESTION THAT I HEARD WHICH WAS IS IT

  • THAT I HEARD WHICH WAS IS IT EVER APPROPRIATE TO INVESTIGATE

  • EVER APPROPRIATE TO INVESTIGATE A POLITICAL OPPONENT?

  • A POLITICAL OPPONENT? AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES?

  • AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES? I REMEMBER ADAM TOOK A PASS ON

  • I REMEMBER ADAM TOOK A PASS ON THAT AND I DIDN’T THINK IT WAS A

  • THAT AND I DIDN’T THINK IT WAS A GREAT ANSWER FROM THE

  • GREAT ANSWER FROM THE PRESIDENT’S ATTORNEYS.

  • PRESIDENT’S ATTORNEYS. BUT THAT’S A REALLY GOOD

  • BUT THAT’S A REALLY GOOD QUESTION.

  • QUESTION. WHAT ARE THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER

  • WHAT ARE THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE?

  • WHICH IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE? THE FACT THAT SOMEONE’S RUNNING

  • THE FACT THAT SOMEONE’S RUNNING AGAINST ME DOES NOT GIVE ME AN

  • AGAINST ME DOES NOT GIVE ME AN IMMUNITY FROM CRIME.

  • IMMUNITY FROM CRIME. IT MEANS I SHOULDN’T INVESTIGATE

  • IT MEANS I SHOULDN’T INVESTIGATE THEM BUT DOESN’T MEAN THEY

  • THEM BUT DOESN’T MEAN THEY SHOULD NOT BE INVESTIGATED.

  • SHOULD NOT BE INVESTIGATED. I THOUGHT THAT WAS A REALLY GOOD

  • I THOUGHT THAT WAS A REALLY GOOD QUESTION.

  • QUESTION. I THINK KYRSTEN SINEMA PROBABLY

  • I THINK KYRSTEN SINEMA PROBABLY NOT ON THE WITNESSES, CERTAINLY

  • NOT ON THE WITNESSES, CERTAINLY ON THE ISSUE OF ACQUITTAL OR

  • ON THE ISSUE OF ACQUITTAL OR CONVICTION, I THINK SINEMA ASKED

  • CONVICTION, I THINK SINEMA ASKED A GREAT QUESTION LAST NIGHT AND

  • A GREAT QUESTION LAST NIGHT AND KNOWING HER THE WAY I DO I WOULD

  • KNOWING HER THE WAY I DO I WOULD BE SURPRISED IF YOU ARE NOT

  • BE SURPRISED IF YOU ARE NOT GENERALLY UNDECIDED ON THE

  • GENERALLY UNDECIDED ON THE VERDICT BUT NOT ON WITNESSES.

  • VERDICT BUT NOT ON WITNESSES. >> Martha: DO YOU THINK WELL

  • >> Martha: DO YOU THINK WELL SEE SOME DEMOCRATIC SENATORS

  • SEE SOME DEMOCRATIC SENATORS VOTE TO ACQUIT?

  • VOTE TO ACQUIT? >> FOR SURE YOULL SEE ONE FROM

  • >> FOR SURE YOULL SEE ONE FROM ALABAMA IF HE WANTS TO BE CALLED

  • ALABAMA IF HE WANTS TO BE CALLED SENATOR AGAIN, HELL BE CALLED

  • SENATOR AGAIN, HELL BE CALLED CALLED TO ACQUIT, JOE MANCHIN.

  • CALLED TO ACQUIT, JOE MANCHIN. SINEMA IS HER OWN PERSON AND

  • SINEMA IS HER OWN PERSON AND SHE’S NOT AFRAID OF ANYONE AND

  • SHE’S NOT AFRAID OF ANYONE AND SHE IS GOING ABOUT HER

  • SHE IS GOING ABOUT HER CONSCIENCE AND DOESN’T MATTER

  • CONSCIENCE AND DOESN’T MATTER WHAT ANYBODY ELSE THINKS AND

  • WHAT ANYBODY ELSE THINKS AND THAT’S PART OF WHY I LIKE AND

  • THAT’S PART OF WHY I LIKE AND RESPECT HER SO MUCH.

  • RESPECT HER SO MUCH. I HAVE NOT TALKED TO HER ABOUT

  • I HAVE NOT TALKED TO HER ABOUT IT.

  • IT. I DO NOT THINK YOULL LOSE ANY

  • I DO NOT THINK YOULL LOSE ANY ANY REPUBLICANS.

  • ANY REPUBLICANS. YOU MAY PICK UP COLLINS MANCHIN

BOGUS. >> Martha: SENATOR HAWLEY,

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

弾劾裁判の進展についてのトレイ・ゴウディ氏 (Trey Gowdy on the progress made in the impeachment trial)

  • 5 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語