TAPE MIXUP, IT REALLY COULD HAVE THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL.

THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL. ESSENTIALLY THE SAME THING.

ESSENTIALLY THE SAME THING. WE ARE JOINED BY AUTHOR AND

WE ARE JOINED BY AUTHOR AND COLUMNIST MARK STEYN WHO IS

COLUMNIST MARK STEYN WHO IS WATCHING FROM THE VERY FIRST GAL

WATCHING FROM THE VERY FIRST GAL HAMMER.

HAMMER. YOU ARE ONE OF WHO I SAY IS ONE

YOU ARE ONE OF WHO I SAY IS ONE OF AMERICA’S GREAT EXPERTS ON

OF AMERICA’S GREAT EXPERTS ON THIS TRIAL GREEDILY CONSUMED

THIS TRIAL GREEDILY CONSUMED EVERY MOMENT OF IT.

EVERY MOMENT OF IT. WHAT’S THE ASSESSMENT SO FAR.

WHAT’S THE ASSESSMENT SO FAR. >> IT’S A COMPLETE SPHINCTER

NEW SAW THE PROBLEM WITH IT

NEW SAW THE PROBLEM WITH IT WITH DERSHOWITZ ON THE VIEW.

WITH DERSHOWITZ ON THE VIEW. A CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER

A CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER SHOULDN’T HAVE TO PUT HIMSELF IN

SHOULDN’T HAVE TO PUT HIMSELF IN THAT SITUATION AND THE PROBLEM

THAT SITUATION AND THE PROBLEM HERE IS LAWYERLY ARGUMENTS.

HERE IS LAWYERLY ARGUMENTS. THERE IS NO POINT MAKING LARGELY

THERE IS NO POINT MAKING LARGELY ARGUMENTS, THIS IS A COMPLETELY

ARGUMENTS, THIS IS A COMPLETELY POLITICAL PROCESS.

POLITICAL PROCESS. PEOPLE SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, THE

PEOPLE SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, THE TROUBLE WITH LAWYERLY ARGUMENTS

TROUBLE WITH LAWYERLY ARGUMENTS IS IF IT’S POLITICAL, THE

IS IF IT’S POLITICAL, THE PRESIDENT CAN’T BE DOING THIS,

PRESIDENT CAN’T BE DOING THIS, EVEN IF YOU ACCEPT EVERYTHING

EVEN IF YOU ACCEPT EVERYTHING THAT JOHN BOLTON SAYS, THAT’S A

THAT JOHN BOLTON SAYS, THAT’S A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME.

COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME. I THINK HE SHOULD’VE ACTUALLY

I THINK HE SHOULD’VE ACTUALLY DEFENDED HIMSELF.

DEFENDED HIMSELF. MY PROBLEM WITH THIS BOARD OF AN

MY PROBLEM WITH THIS BOARD OF AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL, THE RATINGS

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL, THE RATINGS ARE SO LOW, ADAM SCHIFF MAY

ARE SO LOW, ADAM SCHIFF MAY ATTEMPT WITH THAT SKIFF ON

ATTEMPT WITH THAT SKIFF ON SUBBASEMENT LEVEL THREE.

SUBBASEMENT LEVEL THREE. THERE IS NOBODY WATCHING THIS.

THERE IS NOBODY WATCHING THIS. IT’S NOT ENOUGH OF A CIRCUS AND

IT’S NOT ENOUGH OF A CIRCUS AND TRUMP SHOULD’VE DEFENDED HIMSELF

TRUMP SHOULD’VE DEFENDED HIMSELF AND SHOVE THIS THING DOWN ADAM

AND SHOVE THIS THING DOWN ADAM SCHIFF’S THROAT DIRECTLY.

SCHIFF’S THROAT DIRECTLY. THE WHOLE PROCESS IS STUPID.

THE WHOLE PROCESS IS STUPID. THE CHIEF JUSTICE READING OUT

THE CHIEF JUSTICE READING OUT THE HANDWRITTEN CARDS BY PATRICK

THE HANDWRITTEN CARDS BY PATRICK LEAHY WHICH IN FACT IS WRITTEN

LEAHY WHICH IN FACT IS WRITTEN FOR HIM BY SOME NO-NAME STAFFER

FOR HIM BY SOME NO-NAME STAFFER IN HIS OFFICE, YOU HAVE THE

IN HIS OFFICE, YOU HAVE THE CHIEF JUSTICE LIKE SOME GAME

CHIEF JUSTICE LIKE SOME GAME SHOW HOST, WHAT’S THE NEXT

SHOW HOST, WHAT’S THE NEXT QUESTION, JOHN -- THE WHOLE

QUESTION, JOHN -- THE WHOLE THING IS RIDICULOUS!

THING IS RIDICULOUS! TRUMP SHOULD’VE REVISITED

TRUMP SHOULD’VE REVISITED HIMSELF AND TURNED IT INTO A

HIMSELF AND TURNED IT INTO A REAL CIRCUS.

REAL CIRCUS. >> Tucker: THAT SUCH AN

>> Tucker: THAT SUCH AN INTERESTING POINT.

INTERESTING POINT. AS I WATCH THIS, I KEEP

AS I WATCH THIS, I KEEP THINKING, I WONDER IF THE

THINKING, I WONDER IF THE REPUBLICANS ARE BEING TOO

REPUBLICANS ARE BEING TOO LITERAL AND THAT’S THE REASON WE

LITERAL AND THAT’S THE REASON WE WENT FULL GAGA ON THE OPENING

WENT FULL GAGA ON THE OPENING TONIGHT BECAUSE IT’S HARD TO

TONIGHT BECAUSE IT’S HARD TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY AND IT’S HIM

TAKE IT SERIOUSLY AND IT’S HIM AND TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY.

AND TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY. THE CHARGES DON’T EVEN MAKE

THE CHARGES DON’T EVEN MAKE SENSE.

SENSE. THE WHOLE THING IS SO NUTS!

THE WHOLE THING IS SO NUTS! MAYBE IT’S BETTER TO SAY THAT

MAYBE IT’S BETTER TO SAY THAT OUT LOUD!

OUT LOUD! >> I WOULD’VE SAID, AS WE SAY IN

>> I WOULD’VE SAID, AS WE SAY IN ENGLISH COURTS, SCHIFF SHOULD’VE

ENGLISH COURTS, SCHIFF SHOULD’VE MADE HIS CASE AND THE DEMOCRATS

MADE HIS CASE AND THE DEMOCRATS MAKE THEIR CASE, AND THE DEFENSE

MAKE THEIR CASE, AND THE DEFENSE SHOULD’VE JUST STOOD UP AND SAY,

SHOULD’VE JUST STOOD UP AND SAY, AS THEY SAY IN ENGLISH COURTS,

AS THEY SAY IN ENGLISH COURTS, NO CASE TO ANSWER.

NO CASE TO ANSWER. AND LEFT IT BACK.

AND LEFT IT BACK. THE ONLY THING I WOULD ADD IS

THE ONLY THING I WOULD ADD IS THAT THE ONLY REAL CRIME HERE,

THAT THE ONLY REAL CRIME HERE, TO GO BACK TO WHAT YOU WERE

TO GO BACK TO WHAT YOU WERE SAYING ABOUT UKRAINE, UKRAINE IS

SAYING ABOUT UKRAINE, UKRAINE IS OUR GREATEST EVER ALLY, UKRAINE

OUR GREATEST EVER ALLY, UKRAINE WAS THERE WHEN WE STORMED THE

WAS THERE WHEN WE STORMED THE BEACHES OF NORMANDY, UKRAINIANS

BEACHES OF NORMANDY, UKRAINIANS VOLUNTEERS WERE AT FORT SUMTER,

VOLUNTEERS WERE AT FORT SUMTER, THEY’VE BEEN WITH US THROUGHOUT

THEY’VE BEEN WITH US THROUGHOUT THE HISTORY OF THE REPUBLIC IT.

THE HISTORY OF THE REPUBLIC IT. THE ONLY CRIME IN THIS THING WAS

THE ONLY CRIME IN THIS THING WAS HUNTER BIDEN WHO STOLE THE

HUNTER BIDEN WHO STOLE THE WEALTH OF UKRAINE FROM THE

WEALTH OF UKRAINE FROM THE PEOPLE OF UKRAINE.

PEOPLE OF UKRAINE. HUNTER BIDEN’S RACKET IS NOT

HUNTER BIDEN’S RACKET IS NOT ACTUALLY A VICTIMLESS CRIME AND

ACTUALLY A VICTIMLESS CRIME AND THE VICTIM WAS UKRAINE.

THE VICTIM WAS UKRAINE. >> Tucker: THAT SUCH A GREAT

>> Tucker: THAT SUCH A GREAT POINT.

POINT. IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE UKRAINE IS

IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE UKRAINE IS OUR ESSENTIAL ALLY IMPORTANT

OUR ESSENTIAL ALLY IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO SEND YOUR SON TO GO

ENOUGH TO SEND YOUR SON TO GO DIE THERE WHICH IS THE CASE ADAM

DIE THERE WHICH IS THE CASE ADAM SCHIFF HAS MADE THE CASE, YOU’D

SCHIFF HAS MADE THE CASE, YOU’D BE UPSET THAT HUNTER BIDEN WAS T

BE UPSET THAT HUNTER BIDEN WAS T >> THEY WANT TO BUILD A UKRAINE

>> THEY WANT TO BUILD A UKRAINE SAFE ENOUGH FOR THE SONS OF

SAFE ENOUGH FOR THE SONS OF LIFETIME -- LOOK, THIS WHOLE

LIFETIME -- LOOK, THIS WHOLE THING IS A JOKE!

THING IS A JOKE! THIS WHOLE IDEA, I DO NOT LIKE

THIS WHOLE IDEA, I DO NOT LIKE THE IDEA OF THE LAWYERS

THE IDEA OF THE LAWYERS APPEARING TO RESIST.

APPEARING TO RESIST. THEY SHOULD SAY, JOHN BOLTON,

THEY SHOULD SAY, JOHN BOLTON, BRING HIM ON!

BRING HIM ON! LET’S HAVE HIM IN THE WITNESS

LET’S HAVE HIM IN THE WITNESS STAND FOR TWO WEEKS.

STAND FOR TWO WEEKS. THIS THING IS GOING SO GREAT FOR

THIS THING IS GOING SO GREAT FOR YOU.

YOU. LET’S HAVE THEM HERE AND ASK ALL

LET’S HAVE THEM HERE AND ASK ALL THE QUESTIONS YOU WANT, WE HAVE

THE QUESTIONS YOU WANT, WE HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR.

NOTHING TO FEAR. THIS

LET’S EXTEND THIS TO

LET’S EXTEND THIS TO NOVEMBER 3RD, 4TH, 5TH, SEE HOW

NOVEMBER 3RD, 4TH, 5TH, SEE HOW IT WORKS OUT, YOU LOSERS.

IT WORKS OUT, YOU LOSERS. >> Tucker: LITERALLY COULD

>> Tucker: LITERALLY COULD NOT AGREE MORE.

NOT AGREE MORE. THAT’S THE BEST CASE AGAINST

THAT’S THE BEST CASE AGAINST IMPEACHMENT I’VE HEARD SO FAR.