♪ STEVE: LIVE AUDIENCE SHOW. WELCOME BACK, 5 HOURS FROM RIGHT

WELCOME BACK, 5 HOURS FROM RIGHT NOW IT WOULD BE DAY 4 OF THE

NOW IT WOULD BE DAY 4 OF THE SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL SCHEDULED TO KICK OFF IN THE

SCHEDULED TO KICK OFF IN THE U.S. SENATE.

U.S. SENATE. AINSLEY: DEMOCRATS PUSH FOR MORE

AINSLEY: DEMOCRATS PUSH FOR MORE WITNESSES, REPUBLICANS SAY

WITNESSES, REPUBLICANS SAY THERE'S ONE AGREE THAT THEY

THERE'S ONE AGREE THAT THEY SHOULD ALL AGREE ON IS HUNTER

SHOULD ALL AGREE ON IS HUNTER BIDEN.

BIDEN. BRIAN: MEMBER OF HOUSE COMMITTEE

BRIAN: MEMBER OF HOUSE COMMITTEE FORMER NAVY SEAL HIMSELF,

FORMER NAVY SEAL HIMSELF, CONGRESSMAN DAN CRENSHAW IS

CONGRESSMAN DAN CRENSHAW IS HERE.

HERE. [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]

[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE] >> YOU KNOW THE STATE INSIDE AND

>> YOU KNOW THE STATE INSIDE AND OUT, BASICALLY GETTING WHAT YOU

OUT, BASICALLY GETTING WHAT YOU HAD TO DIGEST BY THE SAME PEOPLE

HAD TO DIGEST BY THE SAME PEOPLE THAT WERE DELIVERING IT BEFORE

THAT WERE DELIVERING IT BEFORE CHRISTMAS, NOW WE GET IT AFTER

CHRISTMAS, NOW WE GET IT AFTER CHRISTMAS, PEOPLE ARE ACTING

CHRISTMAS, PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE WE NEVER HEARD IT BEFORE.

LIKE WE NEVER HEARD IT BEFORE. >> YOU KNOW, THAT'S THEIR JOB TO

>> YOU KNOW, THAT'S THEIR JOB TO PRESENT THEIR WEAK CASE TO THE

PRESENT THEIR WEAK CASE TO THE SENATE AND THE SENATE'S JOB TO

SENATE AND THE SENATE'S JOB TO ADJUDICATE THAT.

ADJUDICATE THAT. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IS

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING, WHAT WE ARE SEEING,

HAPPENING, WHAT WE ARE SEEING, WE STILL HAVE A VERY WEAK CASE,

WE STILL HAVE A VERY WEAK CASE, THE REEXPLAINING SOME OF THE

THE REEXPLAINING SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE ALREADY KNEW, WAS

THINGS THAT WE ALREADY KNEW, WAS TRUMP INTERESTED IN THE BIDEN

TRUMP INTERESTED IN THE BIDEN BARISMA ISSUE?

BARISMA ISSUE? YES, HE HAS A DUTY TO BE

YES, HE HAS A DUTY TO BE INTERESTED IN THAT, ON ITS FACE

INTERESTED IN THAT, ON ITS FACE IT WAS A CORRUPT ISSUE, CLEAR

IT WAS A CORRUPT ISSUE, CLEAR CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST. THAT'S THE HEART OF THE ENTIRE

THAT'S THE HEART OF THE ENTIRE CASE, WHETHER OR NOT OUR

CASE, WHETHER OR NOT OUR PRESIDENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO LOOK

PRESIDENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS CLEARLY A CORRUPT

INTO WHAT WAS CLEARLY A CORRUPT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUNTER

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUNTER BIDEN AND BARISMA AND THE VICE

BIDEN AND BARISMA AND THE VICE PRESIDENT THREATENING TO

PRESIDENT THREATENING TO WITHHOLD A BILLION DOLLARS IN

WITHHOLD A BILLION DOLLARS IN AID IN THE UKRAINIAN PROSECUTOR

AID IN THE UKRAINIAN PROSECUTOR WASN'T FIRED WHO WAS

WASN'T FIRED WHO WAS INVESTIGATING THE COMPANY THAT

INVESTIGATING THE COMPANY THAT HIS SON WAS ON.

HIS SON WAS ON. AINSLEY: WHY DID THEY LET HIM

AINSLEY: WHY DID THEY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT?

GET AWAY WITH IT? IF YOU DON'T FIRE THE PROSECUTOR

IF YOU DON'T FIRE THE PROSECUTOR THEN I'M NOT GIVING YOU THE

THEN I'M NOT GIVING YOU THE MONEY, THAT'S QUID PRO QUO AND

MONEY, THAT'S QUID PRO QUO AND HE ADMITS IT.

HE ADMITS IT. >> RIGHT, THAT'S THE QUESTION WE

>> RIGHT, THAT'S THE QUESTION WE ALL ASK AND POINT TO, IT'S

ALL ASK AND POINT TO, IT'S MASSIVE HYPOCRISY, IT REALLY IS,

MASSIVE HYPOCRISY, IT REALLY IS, AND THEY ARE TRYING TO SHIFT AND

AND THEY ARE TRYING TO SHIFT AND PROJECT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE,

PROJECT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE, SAYING IT'S DEBUNK AND I DON'T

SAYING IT'S DEBUNK AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS, HOW IS IT

KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS, HOW IS IT DEBUNKED, WE HAVE ALL THE FACTS,

DEBUNKED, WE HAVE ALL THE FACTS, THEY ARE NOT DISPUTABLE AT ALL,

THEY ARE NOT DISPUTABLE AT ALL, A LOT OF WITNESSES COMING

A LOT OF WITNESSES COMING FORWARD AND ADMITTED THAT, THEY

FORWARD AND ADMITTED THAT, THEY SAID THIS WAS A SERIOUS CONFLICT

SAID THIS WAS A SERIOUS CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

OF INTEREST. >> WOULD THE PRESIDENT HAVE MADE

>> WOULD THE PRESIDENT HAVE MADE HIS CASE BETTER, I WAS

HIS CASE BETTER, I WAS INTERESTED, IT WOULD HAVE

INTERESTED, IT WOULD HAVE AFFECTED 2016 AND NOT 2020,

AFFECTED 2016 AND NOT 2020, WOULD THAT HAVE HELPED?

WOULD THAT HAVE HELPED? >> YEAH, AND THAT IS WHAT THE

>> YEAH, AND THAT IS WHAT THE PRESIDENT WAS LOOKING FOR, HE

PRESIDENT WAS LOOKING FOR, HE DID HAVE CONCERNS THAT MANY

DID HAVE CONCERNS THAT MANY UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS WERE -- WERE

UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS WERE -- WERE OPENLY AGAINST HIM IN 2016

OPENLY AGAINST HIM IN 2016 ELECTION, AND, YOU KNOW, LAST

ELECTION, AND, YOU KNOW, LAST NIGHT AS THEY THE HOUSE MANAGERS

NIGHT AS THEY THE HOUSE MANAGERS WERE GOING THROUGH THEIR CASE,

WERE GOING THROUGH THEIR CASE, THEY KEPT BRIG UP INVESTIGATIONS

THEY KEPT BRIG UP INVESTIGATIONS BUT THEY CAREFULLY LEAVE OUT

BUT THEY CAREFULLY LEAVE OUT THAT INVESTIGATIONS WAS A BROAD

THAT INVESTIGATIONS WAS A BROAD SERIES OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT

SERIES OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT INCLUDE 2016 ELECTION, AND SO

INCLUDE 2016 ELECTION, AND SO THE QUESTION WAS THIS ABOUT 2016

THE QUESTION WAS THIS ABOUT 2016 OR 2020?

OR 2020? THERE'S NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER

THERE'S NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER THAT ANY OF THIS WAS ABOUT 2020,

THAT ANY OF THIS WAS ABOUT 2020, BUT THAT'S THE PREMISE OF THE

BUT THAT'S THE PREMISE OF THE DEMOCRATS' CASE.

DEMOCRATS' CASE. >> ALSO MAKING NEWS IN THE LAST

>> ALSO MAKING NEWS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS, THE DEPARTMENT OF

24 HOURS, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ESSENTIALLY SAID THEY

JUSTICE ESSENTIALLY SAID THEY SCREWED UP AND SENT CLASSIFIED

SCREWED UP AND SENT CLASSIFIED REPORT TO THE DOJ THAT SAID

REPORT TO THE DOJ THAT SAID ESSENTIALLY TO THE FISA COURT

ESSENTIALLY TO THE FISA COURT THAT SAID DOJ PROBABLY DID NOT

THAT SAID DOJ PROBABLY DID NOT HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR TWO OF

HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR TWO OF THOSE FISA WARRANTS WHICH MEANT

THOSE FISA WARRANTS WHICH MEANT THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN

THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATING WHICH MEANT WE

INVESTIGATING WHICH MEANT WE WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING

WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE RIGHT NOW LIKE THIS IN 2020

ELSE RIGHT NOW LIKE THIS IN 2020 IN NOVEMBER, THERE'S GOING TO BE

IN NOVEMBER, THERE'S GOING TO BE AN ELECTION, ELIZABETH WARREN

AN ELECTION, ELIZABETH WARREN WOULD LIKE TO BE THE PRESIDENT

WOULD LIKE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SHE WAS IN

OF THE UNITED STATES, SHE WAS IN GRIMES, IOWA ON MONDAY AND A GUY

GRIMES, IOWA ON MONDAY AND A GUY CAME UP TO HER AND HE DIDN'T

CAME UP TO HER AND HE DIDN'T KNOW HE WAS ON CAMERA BUT THERE

KNOW HE WAS ON CAMERA BUT THERE WAS A MICROPHONE NEAR AND HE IS

WAS A MICROPHONE NEAR AND HE IS VERY FRUSTRATED THAT SHE WANTS

VERY FRUSTRATED THAT SHE WANTS TO GIVE AWAY COLLEGE AND FORGIVE

TO GIVE AWAY COLLEGE AND FORGIVE COLLEGE DEBT BECAUSE HE PLAYED

COLLEGE DEBT BECAUSE HE PLAYED BY THE RULES WHILE HIS FRIENDS

BY THE RULES WHILE HIS FRIENDS DIDN'T, LISTEN TO THIS.

DIDN'T, LISTEN TO THIS. >> MY DAUGHTER IS GETTING OUT OF

>> MY DAUGHTER IS GETTING OUT OF SCHOOL, I SAVED ALL OF MY MONEY.

SCHOOL, I SAVED ALL OF MY MONEY. >> GOD BLESS YOU.

>> GOD BLESS YOU. >> AM I GOING TO GET MY MONEY

>> AM I GOING TO GET MY MONEY BACK?

BACK? SO YOU'RE GOING TO PAY FOR

SO YOU'RE GOING TO PAY FOR PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T SAVE ANY MONEY

PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T SAVE ANY MONEY AND THOSE OF US WHO DID THE

AND THOSE OF US WHO DID THE RIGHT THING GET SCREWED?

RIGHT THING GET SCREWED? STEVE: HE GOES ONTO SAY, LOOK,

STEVE: HE GOES ONTO SAY, LOOK, MY NEIGHBOR, TOOK VACATION AND

MY NEIGHBOR, TOOK VACATION AND HAD A LOT OF FUN AND I PLAYED BY

HAD A LOT OF FUN AND I PLAYED BY THE RULES, IS THAT FAIR?

THE RULES, IS THAT FAIR? >> HE'S ASKING QUESTIONS THAT A

>> HE'S ASKING QUESTIONS THAT A LOT OF AMERICANS WOULD LIKE TO

LOT OF AMERICANS WOULD LIKE TO ASK, IT'S A FALSE SENSE OF

ASK, IT'S A FALSE SENSE OF COMPASSION THAT THEY ARE

COMPASSION THAT THEY ARE OFFERING, THEY ALWAYS CLOAK

OFFERING, THEY ALWAYS CLOAK THEIR POLICIES IN COMPASSION BUT

THEIR POLICIES IN COMPASSION BUT IT'S A LIE, THIS ISN'T FAIR,

IT'S A LIE, THIS ISN'T FAIR, IT'S NOT FAIR TO TAKE FROM OTHER

IT'S NOT FAIR TO TAKE FROM OTHER PEOPLE AND GIVE TO SOMEONE ELSE

PEOPLE AND GIVE TO SOMEONE ELSE JUST BECAUSE YOU WANT THEIR

JUST BECAUSE YOU WANT THEIR VOTES, THAT'S THE DEFINITION OF

VOTES, THAT'S THE DEFINITION OF BUYING VOTES.

BUYING VOTES. >> IS THAT WHAT'S HAPPENING?

>> IS THAT WHAT'S HAPPENING? >> IF YOU LOOK AT THE PANDERING

>> IF YOU LOOK AT THE PANDERING THAT THE CANDIDATES DO IT'S

THAT THE CANDIDATES DO IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT GETTING VOTES, WE

ALWAYS ABOUT GETTING VOTES, WE WILL GIVE YOU SOMETHING IN

WILL GIVE YOU SOMETHING IN RETURN WE WANT YOUR VOTES, WE

RETURN WE WANT YOUR VOTES, WE WANT YOUR SUPPORT, THAT'S

WANT YOUR SUPPORT, THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING,

EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING, BUT, NO, YOU CANNOT TAKE THE

BUT, NO, YOU CANNOT TAKE THE TAXES AWAY FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE

TAXES AWAY FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE PAID OFF THEIR STUDENT LOANS OR

PAID OFF THEIR STUDENT LOANS OR PEOPLE WHO GOT VOCATIONAL

PEOPLE WHO GOT VOCATIONAL TRAINING CERTIFICATE INSTEAD,

TRAINING CERTIFICATE INSTEAD, WORKING HARD, YOU WANT TO TAKE

WORKING HARD, YOU WANT TO TAKE THEIR TAX MONEY AND PAY SOMEBODY

THEIR TAX MONEY AND PAY SOMEBODY ELSE'S INVESTMENT BECAUSE IT

ELSE'S INVESTMENT BECAUSE IT ISN'T A LOAN, IT'S YOUR CHOICE

ISN'T A LOAN, IT'S YOUR CHOICE TO DO IT AND YOU NEED TO PAY

TO DO IT AND YOU NEED TO PAY THAT BACK.

THAT BACK. BRIAN: PEOPLE WHO DO PAY IT BACK

BRIAN: PEOPLE WHO DO PAY IT BACK LOOK LIKE SUCKERS, THAT'S BEEN

LOOK LIKE SUCKERS, THAT'S BEEN THE THEME ON THE LEFT.

THE THEME ON THE LEFT. AINSLEY: LIKE IF YOU PAID FOR

AINSLEY: LIKE IF YOU PAID FOR YOUR KIDS TO GO TO COLLEGE AND

YOUR KIDS TO GO TO COLLEGE AND SHE COMES IN, YOU'VE ALREADY

SHE COMES IN, YOU'VE ALREADY PAID YOUR MONEY, SHE COMES IN

PAID YOUR MONEY, SHE COMES IN AND GETS ELECTED, YOUR TAX

AND GETS ELECTED, YOUR TAX DOLLARS SHE'S GOING TAKE TO GO

DOLLARS SHE'S GOING TAKE TO GO PAY OFF SOMEONE ELSE'S STUDENT

PAY OFF SOMEONE ELSE'S STUDENT LOAN, IS THAT FAIR, NO.

LOAN, IS THAT FAIR, NO. BRIAN: AL GORE WAS ON THE RECORD

BRIAN: AL GORE WAS ON THE RECORD YESTERDAY FROM DAVOS SAYING THAT

YESTERDAY FROM DAVOS SAYING THAT CLIMATE CHANGE IS LIKE 911, HE

CLIMATE CHANGE IS LIKE 911, HE COMPARES THE TWO, DO YOU?

COMPARES THE TWO, DO YOU? >> NO, NO WE SHOULD NOT COMPARE

>> NO, NO WE SHOULD NOT COMPARE THE TWO.

THE TWO. IT'S -- IT'S ALMOST A LAUGHABLE

IT'S -- IT'S ALMOST A LAUGHABLE EXPLANATION, HE ALSO -- THEY

EXPLANATION, HE ALSO -- THEY COMPARE TO WORLD WAR II, THEY

COMPARE TO WORLD WAR II, THEY COMPARE IT TO STORMING THE

COMPARE IT TO STORMING THE BEACHES OF NORMANDY, THEY ARE

BEACHES OF NORMANDY, THEY ARE TRYING TO CREATE THIS INSANE

TRYING TO CREATE THIS INSANE ALARMISM AND CRISIS MODE BECAUSE

ALARMISM AND CRISIS MODE BECAUSE THEY WANT YOU TO GIVE THEM

THEY WANT YOU TO GIVE THEM POWER, RIGHT, THEY BELIEVE THAT

POWER, RIGHT, THEY BELIEVE THAT THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN HAVE THE

THE ONLY WAY THEY CAN HAVE THE POWER TO REFORM THE ECONOMY IN

POWER TO REFORM THE ECONOMY IN THE WAY THAT THEY WANT IS TO --

THE WAY THAT THEY WANT IS TO -- IS TO DRIVE OUR KIDS INTO HAS

IS TO DRIVE OUR KIDS INTO HAS HYSTERIA AND PRETEND THAT WE ARE

HYSTERIA AND PRETEND THAT WE ARE STORMING THE BEACHES OF

STORMING THE BEACHES OF NORMANDY, IT'S NONSENSE, IT

NORMANDY, IT'S NONSENSE, IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE CAN'T TAKE

DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE CAN'T TAKE THE ISSUE SERIOUSLY, WE SHOULD,

THE ISSUE SERIOUSLY, WE SHOULD, WE SHOULD LOOK AT WHAT'S WORKED.

WE SHOULD LOOK AT WHAT'S WORKED. THE UNITED STATES HAS DECREASED

THE UNITED STATES HAS DECREASED EMISSIONS FAR MORE THAN THE LAST

EMISSIONS FAR MORE THAN THE LAST 10 COUNTRIES COMBINED?

10 COUNTRIES COMBINED? HOW HAVE WE DONE THAT?

HOW HAVE WE DONE THAT? TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN, FRACKING, THE

TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN, FRACKING, THE NUMBER ONE DRIVER OF REDUCTION

NUMBER ONE DRIVER OF REDUCTION OF EMISSIONS, WE SHOULD BE

OF EMISSIONS, WE SHOULD BE BUILDING PIPELINES SO NEW YORK

BUILDING PIPELINES SO NEW YORK AND BOSTON DOESN'T HAVE TO RELY

AND BOSTON DOESN'T HAVE TO RELY ON RUSSIAN IMPORT.

ON RUSSIAN IMPORT. THERE'S REALLY OBVIOUS WAYS TO

THERE'S REALLY OBVIOUS WAYS TO REDUCE EMISSIONS GLOBALLY AND

REDUCE EMISSIONS GLOBALLY AND THEY DON'T WANT TO HEAR THAT,

THEY DON'T WANT TO HEAR THAT, THEY WANT TO KEEP IT ALL IN THE

THEY WANT TO KEEP IT ALL IN THE GROUND, SKYROCKETING ELECTRICITY