字幕表 動画を再生する 英語字幕をプリント >> Greg: IN 1964 "THE NEW YORK TIMES" ENDORSED A DEMOCRAT FOR PRESIDENT. IN 1968, ALSO, '72, '76, '80, '92, '96. 2015. DEMS, DEMS, DEMS. WHAT A SHOCK THAT TODAY THEY ENDORSED A DEMOCRAT. TWO DEMOCRATS. IN CASE ONE GETS A FLAT, WE HAVE A SPARE. THAT'S THE TIME'S DEFINITION OF BREAKING WITH CONVENTION AND DOUBLING DOWN ON THE SAME OLD, SAME OLD. THAT'S HOW THE MEDIA GATEKEEPERS SEE THE WORLD. THE ONLY CHOICES AVAILABLE COME FROM A WIDE RANGE OF LEFTISTS. DO YOU GO LEFT, REALLY LEFT OR REALLY, REALLY LEFT? YOU NEVER GO RIGHT BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE EVIL. THEY PICKED HER TRADITIONAL LIBERAL AND A LEFTIST WHO MAKES CHE GUEVARA LOOK LIKE BARRY GOLDWATER. IT'S REALLY ABOUT BERNIE. IT'S ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE MEDIA ELBOWING SANDERS OUT OF THE WAY. AFTER CNN'S HIT JOB ON THE DEBATE AND THEN THERE'S JOY REI JOY REID. >> I THINK BERNIE IS LYING. HE IS SLOUCHING FORWARD ANYWAY BUT HERE HE CHORTLES. IF YOU LOOK AT HIS EYE LEVEL WHERE HE NORMALLY ANSWERS A QUESTION, WHEN HE MAKES THE DENIAL, HIS SHOULDERS COME UP. HIS EYE LEVEL IS BELOW IS HIS SHOULDERS. LIARS LIKE TO START WITH WELL. HE LOOKS AWAY, LAUGHS. IF HE SET IT WHICH I HE DID IT WOULD'VE BEEN BETTER TO OWN IT. >> Greg: POWERFUL STUFF. JOY HIRING A LIE DETECTOR. IT'S LIKE CHARLIE SHEEN HIRING A DRUG SNIFFING DOG. MEMBER THOSE POSTS WERE THE PRODUCT OF A HACK. IT'S CLEAR THE ESTABLISHED MEDIA IS DECIDING WHO THEY WANT AND DON'T AND MAKING SURE EVERYONE FALLS IN LINE. THEY LOOK AT THE COUNTRY AND INCENTIVE SING A STRONG PROSPEROUS ECONOMY THE -- THEY SEE THEMSELVES OUT OF POWER. THE GOOD NEWS IS YOU SEE THE MEDIA'S DISTASTE FOR YOU OUT THERE IN THE OPEN. PLEASE DON'T RETURN THE FAVOR AND CALL THEM A HACK. THAT WOULD BE MEAN. >> Jesse: THAT WAS A GOOD MONOLOGUE. >> Greg: THANK YOU. I WILL GO TO YOU FIRST, JESSE. >> Jesse: I NEVER KNEW THAT WAS HOW TO GET YOU TO GO TO ME FIRST. [LAUGHTER] >> Greg: TO PICK TWO OPPOSITES ON THE LIBERAL SPECTRUM. >> Jesse: I DON'T CARE WHO "THE NEW YORK TIMES" ENDORSES. I CARE FOR "THE NEW YORK POST" ENDORSES. I DON'T THINK THESE ENDORSEMENTS MEAN ANYTHING. I THINK BACK IN THE DAY, UNION ENDORSEMENTS DID WHEN THE MOB -- I SHOULDN'T SAY MOB. WHEN THE UNION BOSS TOLD THE WORKERS WHO DEVOTE FOR BUT EVEN THEN I THINK NOW THIS IS MORE INSIDE BASEBALL. IT'S LIKE THE BACHELOR. YOU'RE AT THE FINAL ROSE CEREMONY AND HE GIVES TO ROSES DUE TO WOMEN. IT'S BITTERSWEET. YOU HAVE TO BE THINKING OKAY, I WILL LET THE GUY PUT A RING ON MY FINGER BUT IT JUST DOESN'T FEEL RIGHT. NO ESPECIALLY BECAUSE IT'S A SECOND-TIER CANDIDATE LUMPED IN WITH THE FIRST, LIZ WARREN HAS TO BE THINKING REALLY? DOESN'T FEEL GOOD. THE WAY THEY KIND OF SCREWED OVER BERNIE SANDERS, I THINK THAT WAS REALLY WRONG. THEY SAID BERNIE'S MOMENT HAD PASSED. >> Greg: AND HE HAD A HEART ATTACK. THEY BROUGHT THAT UP. >> Jesse: THEY BROUGHT UP AMY. SHE'S NEVER HAD AN ENDORSEMENT OR MOVEMENT. THIS BRINGS ME TO A PERSONAL STORY. LAST NIGHT IN THE ELEVATOR IN MY BUILDING, ABOUT TO CLOSE, THE ARM GOES THROUGH, THREE BERNIE SANDERS SUPPORTERS COME INTO MY ELEVATOR. THEY ALL HAVE THE BERNIE 2020 T-SHIRTS, THEY BEEN OUT CANVASSING, THE WOMAN SAYS I KNOW HEALER. I TEND SOME BUT I GET NERVOUS. A LOT OF THAT TIME IT'S NOT A GOOD THING. SHE GOES I DON'T AGREE WITH ANYTHING YOU BELIEVE IN, ANYTHING YOU SAY BUT I RESPECT THE OPPOSITION AND AS A MATTER OF FACT, YOU GUYS, MEETING FOX NEWS, YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN FAIR TO BERNIE. I SAID BERNIE'S GETTING SCREWED, JUST LIKE TRUMP DID. SHE GOES YOU KNOW WHAT, WHEN THEY SCREAM OVER AGAIN, THEY THEY SCREAM OVER AGAIN, WHEY THEY SCREAM OVER AGAIN, WEEY THEY SCREAM OVER AGAIN, WE ARE GOING TO DO WHAT WE DID LAST TIME AND VOTE FOR TRUMP. CAN YOU BELIEVE IT? OR CALLED MY REAL ESTATE AGENT AND I SET I LIVE IN A BERNIE SANDERS BUILDING? I MADE A CALL. >> Greg: DO YOU THINK THE TIMES MESSAGE, IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT BERNIE, IT'S ABOUT JOE. NO OLD WHITE MAN. NOT GOING TO WORK. >> Juan: I THOUGHT IT WAS A SILLY THING TO DO BASICALLY BECAUSE EVERYBODY GETS ONE VOTE, RIGHT? YOU GET ONE CANDIDATE. THEY SHOULD'VE PICKED ONE CANDIDATE. I WOULD AGREE THAT I DON'T THINK NEWSPAPER ENDORSEMENTS MEAN AS MUCH AS THEY USED TO BUT THEY DO HAVE SOME MEANING. I THINK LOCAL PAPERS, DES MOINES, IOWA, FOR EXAMPLE, I THINK "THE REGISTER" IS GOING TO HAVE MORE IMPACT ON THE CAUCUSES THAN THIS BUT I ALSO THINK THAT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE OPPORTUNITY THEY HAD BETWEEN THE FAR LEFT AS REPRESENT BY BERNIE AND THE MORE CENTRIST POSITIONS REPRESENTED BY KLOBUCHAR, BIDEN AND THE LIKE. BERNIE VERSUS BIDEN ESSENTIALLY MADE DIDN'T MAKE A CHOICE THERE. TO ME THEY LOST AN OPPORTUNITY BECAUSE THAT'S THE BIG FIGHT WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY RIGHT NOW. IF THEY HAD SOME PLEA PICKED KLOBUCHAR OR WARREN, IT WOULD HAVE GIVEN ADDED ATTENTION IN TERMS OF THE MEDIA SPOTLIGHT TO ONE CANDIDATE. NOW IT'S KIND OF DIFFUSE AND AS A RESULT, DOESN'T HAVE THE PUNCH, EVEN THE LIMITED PUNCH THE YOU DESCRIBE, JESSE, FOR ANYBODY. >> Greg: WHAT YOU THINK OF EMILY? >> Emily: NEWSPAPER ENDORSEMENTS BARELY MEAN ANYTHING ANYMORE AND FRANKLY THE MATTER MORE TO DONORS THEN THEY DO TO VOTERS. TO THAT EXTENT, THIS HURTS BIDEN THE MOST, WHO'S THE ONE THAT NEEDS THE MOST FUND-RAISING. ALSO HE'S THE ONE THAT NEEDS PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THAT HE'S THE CONSENSUS PICK. I THINK IT'S A COP-OUT FOR THEM TO HAVE CHOSEN TO CALL. BACK IN THE DAY WHEN YOU GOT A PHYSICAL PAPER, IT WAS A BIG DEAL TO FIND OUT WHO THEY ENDORSED BUT NOW WE KNOW HOW EVERYONE FEELS. THERE IS NO HIDING ANY ONE OF THOSE INDIVIDUAL JOURNALISTS OR THE EDITORIAL BOARD'S FEELINGS. WE ARE HAVING IT RAMMED DOWN OUR THROATS EVERY DAY ALL DAY AND ALL FORMS OF SOCIAL MEDIA AND THEIR OUTLETS. IT'S NOT REALLY A SURPRISE IN THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DAMAGING BIDEN AND BERNIE. WE HAVE KNOWN THAT ALL ALONG. >> Greg: I THINK "THE NEW YORK TIMES," LIMITED LIZ WARREN IS A GIFTED STORYTELLER. >> Dana: I WROTE THAT RIGHT HERE. I THOUGHT YOU WERE GOING TO SEIZE ON IT. >> Greg: I AM LETTING YOU SEIZE ON IT. >> Dana: THAT WAS INTERESTING. YEAH, SHE HAS TOLD SOME STORIES. THE PRESIDENT, IF SHE WERE THE NOMINEE, WOULD CERTAINLY BE RETELLING THE STORIES ON THE TRAIL. IT'S LIKE "TIME" MAGAZINE FOR THE PERSON OF THE YEAR, THEY HAD THE PROTESTER. AND THEN IT RENDERS IT TOTALLY MEANINGLESS. I ALSO NOTED ONE OTHER THING I THOUGHT WAS A GOOD COMPONENT FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP IN THE EDITORIAL. HE WILL RUN ON THIS. WHICH IS THEY SAID WARREN HAD A HARD TIME ANSWERING HOW SHE WOULD BE ABLE TO GET ANY OF THE STUFF DONE WHEN IT WENT UP AGAINST A CONSERVATIVE JUDICIARY. BECAUSE IT WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. I THINK HE'S OBVIOUSLY HAD A HUGE IMPACT. "NEW YORK TIMES" EDITORIAL PAGES ASKING ABOUT THOSE THINGS. I ALSO THINK IT WAS ABOUT NOMINATING TO WOMEN. I THINK OF KAMALA HARRIS WERE STILL IN THE RACE, THEY WOULD'VE CHOSEN THREE. I TRULY BELIEVE THAT. AND KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND. PRETTY INSULTING OF TULSI GABBARD. >> Greg: I THINK IT'S ALSO THE FACT THAT THEY DIDN'T JUST GIVE IT TO LIZ MAY BE MEANT I HAD SOME RESERVATIONS. >> Dana: I THINK THE TIMING WAS INTERESTING. "THE NEW YORK TIMES" IS MORE ABOUT BUILDING ITS OWN BRAND. ITS OWN TV SHOW. >> Greg: THAT'S HILARIOUS. >> Dana: INSTEAD OF SATURDAY
B1 中級 ガットフェルド、ニューヨーク・タイムズのお墨付きについて (Gutfeld on the New York Times endorsements) 16 0 林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日 シェア シェア 保存 報告 動画の中の単語