字幕表 動画を再生する 英語字幕をプリント >> THE EMPHASIS IS ON LITIGATORS. THE EMPHASIS IS ON COMFORT LEVEL IN THE COURTROOM. THE EMPHASIS IS MAKING THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE CASE TO PROTECT AND DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTION, TO SEEK THE TRUTH FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. >> Bill: HOUSE DEMOCRATS, YOU HEARD IT LAST HOUR, MOVING FORWARD NOW. FOUR WEEKS LATER AFTER THE IMPEACHMENT VOTE WAS PASSED IN THE HOUSE. THIS, AS WE LEARN NOW, THE MANAGERS FOR THE CASE, SEVEN CONGRESS MEMBERS FROM THE DEMOCRATIC SIDE WILL SERVE AS MANAGING THE MANAGENG THE MANAGERS THE MANAGERS IHE MANAGERS INE MANAGERS IN THE SENATE. KEN STARR, HAPPY NEW YEAR TWO. A WAY TO GO NOW. FIRST OF ALL, YOUR OBSERVATION OF THE SEVEN THAT WERE CHOSEN, AND NAMED LAST HOUR? WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT, IF MUCH? >> I THINK THE SPEAKER CHOSE WELL AND WISELY. OTHER THAN I HAVE SOME RESERVATIONS ABOUT JERRY NADLER IN TERMS OF HIS COURTROOM ABILITIES. HE IS JUST TENDING TO BE, AS HE WAS IN THE PRESS CONFERENCE, JUST OVER THE TOP. HE ALSO SAID EVERYTHING IS ALREADY BEEN PROVEN. SO THERE'S AN INCOHERENCE IN JERRY NADLER'S APPROACH TO THINGS. BUT WE NOW HAVE THE FIELD MARSHALS, THE GENERALS. THAT REPORTING INTO THEIR COMMANDER IN CHIEF, THE SPEAKER. SHE IS GOING TO, I THINK, CONTINUE TO BE GUIDING THIS PROCESS. WHICH IS, ABOVE ALL, ALL ABOUT WITNESSES ON THE SENATE SIDE. I THINK SHE HAS CHOSEN WELL AND WISELY. >> Bill: WHAT ADAM SCHIFF SAID A MOMENT AGO, HE REFLECTED ON YOUR TIME, 20, 21 YEARS AGO. HE WAS ADDRESSING A QUESTION ABOUT WITNESSES. HE WAS SAYING THAT THIS TIME AROUND IT'S NOT ABOUT SEX OR UNSEEMLY MATTERS. THE INFERENCE THAT HE APPLIED THERE. MY QUESTION TO YOU, AS A MATTER OF LAW, AS A PROSECUTOR OR A TRIAL MANAGER, YOU DON'T GET TO PICK YOUR FACTS. THE CASE IS WHAT IT IS. WAS YOUR FEELING ON THE COMMENT HE MADE THERE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT WE WILL SEE WITNESSES? DO YOU THINK THAT WILL HAPPEN OR NOT? >> IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, BECAUSE I THINK THE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER IS FOLLOWING THE CLINTON MODEL. THERE IS A HUGE QUESTION -- WILL THERE BE WITNESSES IN THE HOUSE IMPEACHMENT MANAGERS DURING THE CLINTON IMPEACHMENT DIFFERENTLY CLINTON IMPEACHMENT DESFERENTLY CLINTON IMPEACHMENT DESPERENTLY CLINTON IMPEACHMENT DESPERANTLY CLINTON IMPEACHMENT DESPERATELYW CLINTON IMPEACHMENT DESPERATELYN CLINTON IMPEACHMENT DESPERATELYE CLINTON IMPEACHMENT DESPERATELYD TO CALL WITNESSES. THEY WERE AND THEY WERE ABLE TO DO THAT. THEY WERE ABLE TO TAKE. THE CENTERS AGREED YEARS AGO, "WE DON'T WANT ANY LIVE WITNESSES, LET'S HAVE THE MANAGERS MAKE THEIR CASE. THEN THEY WILL VOTE TO HAVE WITH THEN THEY WILL VOTE WHETHER TO HAVE WITNESSES AT ALL. PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO. WE WILL HEAR THE DRUM BEAT. WE'VE GOT TO HAVE WITNESSES. BY THE WAY, THE WITNESSES CANNOT INCLUDE THE BIDENS. THAT'S JUST OUT. WE WANT OUR WITNESSES BUT WE DON'T WANT THE PRESIDENT TO -- >> Bill: SO BETWEEN PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO, WHAT IS YOUR GUEST? DO YOU HAVE WITNESSES IN THIS TRIAL ARE NOT? IF THE ANSWER IS NO, YOU GOT A SHORT CASE HERE. >> YOU DO. THERE WILL BE A LOT OF PRESSURE ON THE IMPEACHMENT MANAGERS TO PERFORM WELL. IF THEY OVERPLAYED THEIR HAND THE WAY JERRY NADLER JUST DID, "WE'VE ALREADY PROVEN THE CASE," IF YOU'VE PROVEN THE CASE YOU DON'T NEED TO RETRY THE CASE. THAT IS PRECISELY THE APPROACH FROM 21 YEARS AGO. WE DON'T NEED IT. 100 SENATORS SAYING WE DON'T NEED IT, WE DON'T WANT IT. THESE ARE REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS COMPLETELY AGREEING. THAT WILL BE A REAL KEY. CAN YOU PROVE THIS IS VERY SERIOUS? BUT WE REALLY NEED THESE WITNESSES EVEN THOUGH JERRY NADLER SAYS WE PROVED BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. >> Bill: LET ME GET TWO MORE POINTS IN THE 2 MINUTES I HAVE LEFT. IF THAT'S THE CASE THAT YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT THE OUTCOME THEY DON'T BRING WITNESSES AND BOTH SIDES AGREE TO THAT AFTER A LOT OF DEBATE BACK AND FORTH, THEN YOU CAN VOTE ON THE ARTICLES AT THAT POINT, COULD YOU NOT? >> ABSOLUTELY. THAT WILL BE IT. YOU THEN HAVE THE CLOSING ARGUMENTS ON EACH SIDE. BUT YOU ASKED ME TO PROTECT -- I PREDICT THERE WILL BE WITNESSES. WE HAVE HAD TOO MANY INDICATIONS FROM TOO MANY DIFFERENT SENATORS THAT THEY WANT THIS. REMEMBER, AND CLINTON THERE WERE 100 SENATORS AGREEING ON THE PROCESS. HERE WE DON'T HAVE THAT KIND OF UNANIMITY. >> Bill: WHO WAS A WITNESS, THEN? WHO APPEARS? >> I THINK THE TOP ONE IS JOHN BOLTON FOR THE DEMOCRATS. AND THE REPUBLICANS REALLY DO WANT HUNTER BIDEN. >> Bill: SO YOU THINK 11? >> THERE WILL BE A BETTER ROI OLIVER HUNTER BIDEN. WE ALREADY SAW IT THIS. THIS WILL COME DOWN TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE. THIS IS A VIEW OF THE SENATE AND 51 VOTES IS ALL IT TAKES. A MAJORITY TO CALL THE WITNESS. >> Bill: YOU ARE PREDICTING TODAY WE WILL HEAR FROM JOHN BOLTON? YOU WERE SAYING THAT AFTER BIDEN COULD APPEAR AS A WITNESS COMMIT YES OR NO? >> YES IT'S A POSSIBILITY, BUT IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN HOW FACE ONE OF THE TRAIL GOES. IF THE IMPEACHMENT MANAGERS DON'T DO A FANTASTIC JOB, AND THEY MAY NOT COME OF THIS CASE MAY BE OVER. >> Bill: CAN, THANK YOU. LET'S TALK LATER IN THE WEEK AND TAKE IT PIECE BY PIECE AND DAY BY DAY.
B1 中級 ケン・スターがトランプ弾劾裁判のトップ証人を予測 (Ken Starr predicts the top witnesses for Trump impeachment trial) 5 0 林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日 シェア シェア 保存 報告 動画の中の単語