GREG PALKOT, THANK YOU FOR THAT.

>> Bill: FOX NEWS CONFIRMING

MITCH McCONNELL BELIEVES

NANCY PELOSI COULD SEND THE

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT TO THE

SENATE PERHAPS AS SOON AS TODAY.

RANKING OR PUBLIC IN HOUSE

JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WITH ME NOW,

GEORGIA REPUBLICAN DOUG COLLINS.

GOOD MORNING TO YOU.

I BELIEVE THERE HAS TO BE VOTE

FOR US IN THE HOUSE.

DO YOU EXPECT THAT TODAY, SIR?

>> WE HAVEN'T HEARD ABOUT IT

YET.

I WOULDN'T BE HEARING ABOUT IT.

WE'VE ALREADY PROVE THE RULE

THAT WOULD LET THE BILL COME TO

THE FLOOR OF THE NAMES OF

MANAGERS AND SENDS THE BILL.

I HAVE NOT BEEN NOTIFIED YET.

IT'LL BE A SHORT DEBATE ONCE IT

HAPPENS BUT I HAVE NOT BEEN

NOTIFIED.

I'M NOT LOOKING FOR IT TODAY

RIGHT NOW.

>> Bill: YOU ARE NOT, OKAY, AS

OF THE MOMENT.

FORECAST THEN, WENT TO THE TRIAL

BEGIN, DO YOU BELIEVE, ON THAT

SENSE THAT CONGRESS?

>> THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION, IT'S

ALL IN THE HANDS OF NANCY PELOSI

RIGHT NOW.

SHE'S KEEPING THIS FROM THE

SENATE.

IT'S ARGUED A FEW DAYS AFTER

THAT.

I THINK SHE'S IN A TOUGH BIND.

SHE UNDERSTANDS HER CASE HAS

BEEN VERY WEAK IN THE HOUSE.

IT'S NOT SOMETHING THE SENATE

CAN ACTUALLY TAKE SERIOUSLY

BECAUSE WE MAKE IT THE CASE THAT

PROCEDURALLY WAS TERRIBLE.

THEY KNOW THEY'RE GOING TO BE

EXPOSED.

SHE DOESN'T WANT TO SEND IT OVER

TO A QUICK AND HURRIED DEATH,

WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT'S GOING TO

HAPPEN.

BUT I THINK SHE WILL SEND THEM.

WE SEE THAT HAPPENING WITH THE

SENATE DEMOCRATS, SO I THINK IT

WILL HAPPEN FAIRLY SOON,

PROBABLY THE FIRST OF THE WEEK.

>> Bill: SHE SAID, "WE WANT TO

SEE THE ARENA."

MITCH McCONNELL SAID, "FORGET

ABOUT IT, WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO

THAT."

HE ALSO OFFERED THAT THIS IS

JUNIOR VARSITY HOSTAGE

SITUATIONS.

>> MITCH McCONNELL IS PRETTY

BLUNT IN HIS ASSESSMENT.

HE HAS BEEN SINCE THE

IMPEACHMENT HAPPENED.

WHEN DOING SO, I THINK WE OUGHT

TO LOOK AT -- WE SEE THE FACT

THAT HE HAS THE VOTES TO

CONTINUE, AS THE CLINTON TRIAL

DID.

EVEN SOME OF THE SENATE

DEMOCRATS ARE ACKNOWLEDGING IT'S

TIME TO MOVE ON WITH THIS.

TO SAY SHE NEEDS TO SEE THE

ARENA IS SORT OF DISINGENUOUS IN

MY MIND.

BECAUSE WE ALREADY KNOW WHAT IS

ACTUALLY HAPPENING IN THE CASE.

THEY HAVE PUT THE ARTICLES

TOGETHER, THEY MADE THEIR CASE,

THEY SENT THAT BACK, THE FACTS

ARE ALREADY THERE.

MY QUESTION IS NOT A MATTER OF

THE ARENA, BUT IF SHE WANTS TO

SEND OVER.

THAT DOESN'T CHANGE.

THE ARGUMENT ABOUT AN ARENA

DOESN'T REALLY HOLD TRUE BECAUSE

YOU KNOW WHAT IT'LL LOOK LIKE.

SHE JUST NEEDS TO CENTER

MANAGERS OVER TO PRESENT THEIR

CASE.

V7 IT APPEARS THERE'S MOVEMENT

ON THE REPUBLICAN SIDE OF THE

SENATE THAT IF YOU DON'T DO IT

WITHIN 25 DAYS THEY WILL TAKE

ACTION, EVEN IF IT HAS TO GO TO

THAT POINT.

I WANT TO BRING UP A COMMENT

LAST NIGHT, TALKING ABOUT

DEMOCRATS AND THE SOLEIMANI HIT.

IS THAT THEY ARE IN LOVE WITH

TERRORISTS?

YOU SAID THEY MOURNED

YOU SAID THEY SOURNED

YOU SAID THEY SOLRNED

YOU SAID THEY SOLEIED

YOU SAID THEY SOLEIMANI MORE

THAN THE GOLD STAR FAMILIES THAT

SUFFERED UNDER SOLEIMANI AND IS

A PROBLEM?

WANTED TO SAY THAT, SIR?

>> I UNDERSTAND THE FRUSTRATION,

BUT THIS IS MY FRUSTRATION.

WHEN I LOOK AT THIS AND I SEE

THEM COMING TO THE FORCING THE

PRESIDENT ASSASSINATED

SOLEIMANI, WHEN I SEE THEM COME

TO THE FORE AND NOT RECOGNIZE

THE FACT OF A TERRORIST, IT IS

PERSONAL FOR ME.

I UNDERSTAND THE FRUSTRATION

PEOPLE MAY HAVE WITH MY COMMENT,

BUT WHEN I WAS IN IRAQ I WAS IN

HOSPITAL.

WHEN I SAW THE RESULTS OF WHAT

MR. SOLEIMANI DID, WHEN I SAW

IRAQIS AND AMERICAN SOLDIERS AND

COALITION SOLDIERS SITTING THERE

BLOWN WITH LEGS BLOWN OFF, THEIR

BODY PARTS MISSING, MANY OF THEM

DIED, IT'S VERY PERSONAL FOR ME.

SO IT'S VERY FRUSTRATING FOR ME

JUST TO SEE THAT WE DON'T CALL

IT WHAT IT IS, AND THAT THE

PRESIDENT TO ATTACK A TERRORIST.

WHO, BY THE WAY, WAS DESIGNATED

A TERRORIST BY PRESIDENT OBAMA.

SO THAT'S MY FRUSTRATION.

>> Bill: HEAR YOUR WORDS --

"THEY ARE IN LOVE WITH

TERRORISTS."

DO YOU HONESTLY BELIEVE THAT?

>> I THINK THEIR ACTIONS BETRAY

THEM.

TO ALL OF THEM LOOKED

TERRORISTS?

KNOW.

THEY SHE WAS THAT THEY WANT TO

ACKNOWLEDGE THAT HE WAS A

TERRORIST, THEY WANT TO

ACKNOWLEDGE THE FACT THAT THIS

WAS A GOOD THING FOR THE WORLD,

FOR SOLEIMANI TO BE TAKEN OUT.

FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, THEY NEED

TO BE CALLED UP.

IF THEY WOULD STOP CALLING

MATERIALIST, THAT'S ACCUSING A

PRESIDENT OF A CRIME.

THAT'S NOT BEEN TALKED ABOUT A

LOT.

AT THIS POINT WE NEED TO MOVE ON

FROM THE FACT OF THE PRESIDENT

DID WHAT I BELIEVE HE SHOULD

HAVE DONE.

HE TOOK OUT A TERRORIST IN THE

WORLD IS A BETTER PLACE FOR IT.

>> Bill: ONE MORE THING,

THERE'S STATEMENT IN THE WAR

POWERS RESOLUTION WHETHER OR NOT

YOU SUPPORT TERRORISTS.

YOU WOULD AGREE WITH THAT,

RIGHT?

IT'S VERY IDEAL POLITICALLY

TRYING TO RESTRAIN IN A

NONBINDING WAY, THE PRESIDENT

FROM TAKING MORE ACTION AGAINST

IRAN.

LAST, DONE THAT.

>> SPEAKER PELOSI EARLIER IN

HERE BROADCAST, SHE DIDN'T WANT

ANYBODY TO COMMENT ON IT.

SHE DIDN'T WANTED TO BE BINDING

SO THE PRESIDENT COULD VETO IT.

SHE SAID IT WAS THE POLITICAL

DOCUMENT, A POLITICAL STEVEDORE

SLAP AT THE PRESENT.

THE WAR POWERS ACT IS SOMETHING

I'VE TALKED ABOUT BEFORE.

I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH IT ON ITS

OWN CONFIDENTIAL

OWN CONSTDENTIAL

OWN CONSTITNTIAL

OWN CONSTITUTIAL

OWN CONSTITUTIOL