>> Charles: FORMER FBI AGENT

PETER STRZOK ACCUSING THE

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF VIOLATING

HIS RIGHTS IN A NEW COURT FILING

TODAY.

SO HOW WILL IT PLAY OUT?

DOUG BURNS IS HERE WITH ME NOW.

PETER STRZOK SAYS THAT THE

GOVERNMENT VIOLATED HIS RIGHTS.

>> VERY, VERY WEAK CLAIM.

IT IS SOME SLEIGHT-OF-HAND.

THEY WERE SAYING IT FROM THE

BEGINNING WHICH IS THAT WE ARE

ENTITLED TO OUR OWN PRIVATE

POLITICAL OPINIONS.

THAT IS COMPLETE RUBBISH, TO USE

A BRITISH PHRASE.

THEY ARE AT WORK AND WORKING ON

AN INVESTIGATION INVOLVING THAT

SUBJECT MATTER, SO IF I LEAVE MY

JOB, GO HOME AND TELL MY WIFE

EITHER WAY, MY POLITICAL OPINION

ON THE MATTER IS SUCH AND SUCH,

IT CAN'T BE THAT I'M WORKING ON

A MATTER THAT I CAN'T DO AT WORK

WITH EMAILS FROM WORK.

THEY ARE MAKING IT INTO A VERY

WEAK CLAIM.

IT IS NOT GOING TO GO ANYWHERE.

>> Charles: SOMEONE MUST HAVE

TOLD HIM AND LISA PAGE THAT IT

IS TIME TO GO ON THE OFFENSE.

>> IT IS ACTUALLY PRETTY IRONIC,

SERIOUSLY.

THEY ARE TAKING A PAGE FROM

PRESIDENT TRUMP.

LET'S GO ON THE

COUNTEROFFENSIVE, GO ON THE

OTHER SIDE.

LEGALLY, IT IS VERY WEAK.

>> Charles: WHERE DOES THIS GO

FROM HERE?

SO MANY THINGS THAT ARE

UNSETTLED.

PROBABLY ALONG WITH THE VIEWERS,

I LOSE TRACK OF THESE THINGS.

WHERE IS PETER STRZOK?

WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN WITH

SOME OF THESE THINGS?

FOR MORE OF THESE

INVESTIGATIONS --

>> THAT IS A GREAT POINT BECAUSE

THE AVERAGE PERSON, THE JURY,

THE PUBLIC, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

THEY ARE NOW FOLLOWING ALL OF

THIS MY NEW SHOW.

EVEN DURING ALL OF THE HEARINGS,

HE HAD THAT CUP OF COFFEE AT

10:16, NOT 10:18.

PEOPLE ARE NOT FOLLOWING THAT

MUCH OF MY NEW SHOW.

AGAIN, LIKE A BROKEN RECORD, IT

IS JUST A COUNTEROFFENSIVE,

WHICH IS VERY WEAK, LEGALLY.

>> Charles: BRINGING UP

JAMES COMEY, HE PENNED AN OP-ED

TODAY ON WHAT IT IS LIKELY TO BE

PERSONALLY AND PUBLICLY ATTACKED

BY PRESIDENT TRUMP.

WHAT DOES THIS DO FOR HIM IN A

CASE BEYOND HAVING HIS FEELINGS

HURT?

>> ALL VETERANS AND

LAW ENFORCEMENT, RIGHT?

THEY ARE GOING TO TELL YOU, AS

THEY HAVE IN THE PAST, AND ANY

KIND OF CONTEXT WHERE YOUR

BEHAVIORS BEING LOOKED AT, WHICH

IS IS, YOU DON'T MAKE A LOT OF

PUBLIC STATEMENTS.

SO WE ARE SCRATCHING OUR HEADS.

I HAVE A LOT OF DOJ CONNECTIONS

AND FBI AGENTS AND PROSECUTORS,

AND THEY ARE ALL SAYING THAT HIS

BEHAVIOR IS VERY, VERY ODD.

I AM NOT A PSYCHIATRIST.

BUT IT IS HUBRIS.

THAT IS WHAT IT IS.

HE GOT SO INTOXICATED WITH

HIMSELF.

I DON'T KNOW HIM, BY THE WAY,

PERSONALLY.

BUT HE GOES ON AND ON.

>> Charles: IT FEELS LIKE HE

WANTS TO MAKE HIS CURRENT LIFE A

REALITY SHOW.

WE HEAR FROM THEM ALL THE TIME.

OR HE WILL SAY I'M NOT GOING TO

SAY ANYTHING, AND THEN TWO DAYS

LATER --

>> YOU KNOW, YOU CAN'T FAULT A

PERSON FOR TAKING ADVANTAGE OF

IT.

YOU ARE THE BUSINESS EXPERT.

IF WE HAVE CREATED A CLIMATE

WHERE IT CAN TRANSLATE INTO BOOK

DEALS AND SO ON AND SO FORTH,

YOU DON'T FAULT THEM, BUT IT IS

GROSSLY INCONSISTENT WITH WHAT

YOU SHOULD BE DOING IF YOUR

CONDUCT IS BEING LOOKED AT.

>> Charles: THERE IS A LEVEL

OF PROFESSIONALISM THERE.

I HAVE TO TALK ABOUT ONE MORE

THING.

TAKE A LISTEN TO THIS.

>> OH, GOD, I HOPE IT DOES.

LET HER GO.

>> Charles: 2020 DEMOCRAT

JOE BIDEN GETTING HECKLED OVER

THE WEEKEND A MINUTE REVERSING

THE COURSE THAT SAYING HE WOULD

COMPLY IF SUBPOENAED.

IT WAS PRETTY TOUGH TRYING ALIGN

SAYING THAT HE WOULD NOT COMPLY.

HE SORT OF MUDDLED EVERYTHING.

>> HE MADE A HUGE MISTAKE.

HE DIRECTED PEOPLE NOT TO COMPLY

WITH SUBPOENAS.

HE IS SAYING I AM NOT GOING TO

COMPLY.

BUT IN FAIRNESS, I AM NOT GOING

TO PILE IT ON.

IN LESS HE WAS GOING TO

CHALLENGE IT IN COURT, IF IT

CAME OUT WRONG.

HE HAD TO WALK IT BACK.

>> Charles: HE DID SAY THAT BY

COMPLYING, IT WAS TAKING THE

SPOTLIGHT OFF OF

PRESIDENT TRUMP.

SO THE RATIONALE -- GO MORE LIKE

A PUBLIC RELATIONS P.R.

RATIONALE.

KEEPS HEAT ON PRESIDENT TRUMP,

NOT ON ME OR MY SON.

BUT IF YOU GET A SUBPOENA, YOU