字幕表 動画を再生する 英語字幕をプリント >> Tucker: AT BEST. GOOD TO SEE YOU TONIGHT. WHY IS ALL OF THIS HAPPENINGS? THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TOLD YOU FOR THE LAST MONTH THERE'S ONE REAL REASON AT THE BOTTOM, NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW. NOW, THERE ARE CAVEATS TO THAT OF COURSE, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW EXCEPT FOR ANYONE WHO MIGHT POTENTIALLY VOTE DEMOCRAT IN WHICH CASE LAWS ARE RACIST AND MUST BE IGNORED. YOU KNOW THAT. THAT'S PRETTY AMUSING. HERE IS SOMETHING EVEN FUNNIER. THOSE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT THAT WE JUST SAW PASSED IN ORDER TO UPHOLD THE LAW THAT NOBODY IS ABOVE, WELL NEITHER ARTICLE THAT APPARENTLY HAVE JUST BEEN PASSED ACTUALLY ACCUSES THE PRESIDENT OF BREAKING A SPECIFIC LAW. HUH? SO WHY ARE WE HERE? WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THIS? WHY HAVE WE DEVOTED 43 MINUTES SO FAR TONIGHT TO THIS TOPIC? WHY IS THE PRESIDENT BEING IMPEACHED ASK HAKEEM JEFFRIES. IMPEACHMENT HAS A LOT TO DO WITH, YOU NEVER WOULD HAVE GUESSED THIS BY THE WAY, HAS A LOT TO DO WITH SLAVERY. I BET YOU DIDN'T SEE THAT COMING. WATCH HAKEEM JEFFRIES EXPLAIN. >> THERE ARE SOME WHO CYNICALLY ARGUE THAT THE IMPEACHMENT OF THIS PRESIDENT WILL FURTHER DIVIDE AN ALREADY FRACTURED UNION. BUT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DIVISION AND CLARIFICATION. SLAVERY ONCE DIVIDED THE NATION BUT EMANCIPATORS ROSE UP TO CLARIFY THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUALLY. SUFFRAGE ONCE DIVIDED THE NATION BUT WOMEN ROSE UP TO CLARIFY THAT ALL VOICES MUST BE HEARD IN OUR DEMOCRACY. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DIVISION AND CLARIFICATION. >> Tucker: HUH? DID YOU HEAR THAT? DID YOU UNDERSTAND IT? NO. BECAUSE IT WAS INSIRVEL BECAUSE IT WAS DUMB INCAUSE IT WAS DUMB INCIUSE IT WAS DUMB INCIPHE IT WAS DUMB INCIPHERIT WAS DUMB INCIPHERAB WAS DUMB INCIPHERABLEAS DUMB INCIPHERABLE.S DUMB INCIPHERABLE.ONDUMB INCIPHERABLE.ON SMB INCIPHERABLE.ON SOSH FARCES BROG INCIPHERABLE.ON SOSH FARCES BROT INCIPHERABLE.ON SOSH FARCES BROO YOU. BEGINNING WITH RUSSIA AND STORMY DANIELS AND IMPEACHMENT. IF YOU ARE A CYNICAL PERSON YOU MIGHT SUSPECT ALL OF THIS WAS DESIGNED FROM THE BEGINNING TO DISTRACT YOU FROM WHAT'S ACTUALLY GOING ON. AND WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON? WELL, A LOT IS GOING ON. AROUND THE WORLD AND IN THIS COUNTRY. FOR EXAMPLE, ONE AMONG MANY, BEFORE IT LEAVES TOWN FOR CHRISTMAS, THE CONGRESS WILL PASS A 2,000 PAGE SPENDING BILL THAT DANA JUST REFERRED. TO SAY IT AMOUNTS TO $1.4 TRILLION. WHAT'S IN THAT BILL? WOULDN'T YOU LIKE TO KNOW? YOU WERE TOO BUSY WATCHING IMPEACHMENT TO FIND OUT. WE TOOK A LITTLE TIME AND CHECKED. HERE'S A SELECTION. FOR EXAMPLE, THOUSANDS OF LIBERIANS FROM LIBERIA LIVING IN THIS COUNTRY WILL GET A SPECIAL PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP. WHY? HOW DID THAT HAPPEN? DON'T ASK. IT WAS NEVER DEBATED. YOU HAD NO IDEA IT WAS EVENING HAPPENING. THIS IS YOUR COUNTRY. YOU DIDN'T KNOW AND OF COURSE THAT WAS THE POINT. WHAT ABOUT THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN GOING ON NOW FOR 18 YEARS? A FEW WEEKS AGO THE POST SAY OUR LEADERS HAVE BEEN SYSTEMATICALLY LYING TO US HOW THE WAR IS FAILING AND HAS BEEN FOR MORE THAN A DECADE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE SCANDAL OF THE YEAR. INSTEAD THOSE DOCUMENTS ARE FORGOTTEN, ALMOST IMMEDIATELY. WHY? THANKS TO IMPEACHMENT. IN FACT, IN THIS NEW SPENDING BILL CONGRESS JUST VOTED TO KEEP THE MONEY FLOWING UNIMPEDED TO THAT FAILED WAR. $4 BILLION WILL GO TO THE AFGHAN SECURITY FORCES, REALLY? IT'S LIKE A JOKE. WE KNOW FOR DEAD CERTAIN THAT MONEY WILL BE WASTED THE SECOND IT GETS THERE THE TROOPS WE HIRE WILL DESSERT. THEIR WEAPONS WILL WIND UP WITH THE TALIBAN. IF ANYTHING THE MONEY THAT WE SEND IS MORE LIKELY BE SPENT KILLING AMERICAN FORCES THAN TURNING AFGHANISTAN INTO BELGIUM OR WHATEVER THE MISSION IS WE HAVE NO IDEA. BUT WE KNOW IT'S NOT GOING TO ACHIEVE THAT BUT CONGRESS IS DOING IT ANYWAY. MEANWHILE, CONGRESS IS, IN ADDITION TO ALL OF THAT, STILL BUSILY WORKING TO UNDERMINE YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. THE SPENDING BILL CURRENTLY INCLUDES $25 MILLION TO SPEND ON, QUOTE: GUN VIOLENCE RESEARCH. DON'T LIE TO YOURSELF. THAT'S NOT SOCIAL SCIENCE. IT'S MONEY THAT WILL GO TO IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED RESEARCH WITH ONLY ONE PURPOSE. GIVING A PRETEXT TO BREWER DEMOCRATS TO REDUCE YOUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS. YOU THINK THAT MIGHT BOTHER DEMOCRATS BECAUSE, AS YOU KNOW, THEY SPENT ALL WEEK EXTOLLING THE CONSTITUTION, HOW MUCH THEY CARE ABOUT IT, HOW THEY ARE REPRESENTING THE FRAMERS. BUT OF COURSE THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THE BILL OF RIGHTS. T. IF IT'S AN OBSTACLE TO THEIR POWER, THEY ARE AGAINST IT. THAT CATEGORY INCLUDES BOTH STUBBORN CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS LIKE THE FIRST AND SECOND AND SITTING PRESIDENT. CONGRESSMAN AL GREEN BY THE WAY BASICALLY SAID SO TODAY AHEAD OF CONGRESS. JUST A FEW MINUTES AGO IMPEACHING THE PRESIDENT ON BOTH ARTICLES ONE AND TWO. WHEN GREEN CALLED FOR THE PRESIDENT'S IMPEACHMENT, HE AT ANY TIME MENTION HIGH CRIMES DIIMES DIDNES DIDN'T MENTION HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS. HE ACCUSED THE PRESIDENT OF DISAGREEING WITH HIS VIEWS ON IMMIGRATION. WATCH THIS. >> IN THE NAME OF DEMOCRACY, ON BEHALF OF THE REPUBLIC, AND FOR THE SAKE OF THE MANY WHO ARE SUFFERING, I WILL VOTE TO IMPEACH AND I ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO SO AS WELL. >> Tucker: WHAT DID THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ARTICLES 1 AND 2? WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH IMPEACHMENT? IF YOU ARE CONFUSED, YOU DON'T KNOW HOW IT WORKS. SO, HERE'S A PRIMMER, HERE'S ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW. WHEN YOU OPPOSE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY'S IMMIGRATION PLANS, WHAT YOU
B1 中級 タッカーなぜ大統領が弾劾されるのか? (Tucker: Why is the president being impeached?) 2 0 林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日 シェア シェア 保存 報告 動画の中の単語