NUNES, RANKING MEMBER OF THE

HOUSE INTELLIGENCE

COMMITTEE.

CONGRESSMAN, GOOD TO HAVE

YOU WITH US TONIGHT AS WELL.

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT

THOSE SWING DISTRICTS AND

HOW THAT IS GOING TO GO IN

2020?

>> WELL, I THINK ALL THOSE

MEMBERS ARE IN A LOT OF

TROUBLE.

THE KEY IS TWO

THE KEY IS DWO

THE KEY IS DOO

THE KEY IS DO REPUBLICANS

HAVE GOOD CANDIDATES AND IN

MANY OF THOSE DISTRICTS WE

DO.

FOR EXAMPLE, IN CALIFORNIA,

WE HAVE FORMER MEMBER DAVID

VALDEO FOUR POLLS UP BY

DOUBLE DIGITS THAT WAS

BEFORE IMPEACHMENT.

WE HAVE A LOT OF THE GREAT

DISTRICTS WE CAN WIN IN

2020.

AND, YOU KNOW, THE PROBLEM

THAT THEY HAVE WITH THIS

IMPEACHMENT IS THAT THEY DID

NOT RUN A FAIR PROCESS.

SO, WHENEVER THEY SAY THEY

ARE RUNNING A FAIR PROCESS.

IT ACTUALLY MEANS THE

OPPOSITE.

WE HAVE SO MANY WITNESSES

AND WE DIDN'T ASK FOR VERY

MANY.

WE ASKED FOR ABOUT 10

WITNESSES.

THEY HAVE CALLED EXACTLY

ZERO OF OUR WITNESSES IN.

OKAY.

SO, HOW DO YOU HAVE A FAIR

TRIAL?

HOW DO YOU RUN A REAL

INVESTIGATION?

YOU KNOW, FOR ALL THE

NONSENSE THAT WE HAVE HEARD

WITH THESE GUYS WHERE THEY

3406 FROM THE RUSSIA HOAX TO

UKRAINE HOAX THAT THEN

TURNED INTO THE IMPEACHMENT

HOAX.

REMEMBER, WE GAVE THEM

DOZENS AND DODDS DOZENS OF

AND DOZENS OF WITNESSES WHEN

THEY WERE IN CONTROL TO TRY

TO PROVE THE RUSSIA HOAX.

NOW ALL THEY DID WAS LIE TO

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

>> Martha: VERY INTERESTING

REPORT COMING OUT FROM THE

FISA COURT.

PUSHING BACK AGAINST THE FBI

ESSENTIALLY SAYING DON'T TRY

THIS AGAIN WITH US BECAUSE

BY THE TIME IT GETS TO US,

WE ARE ASSUMING WHAT YOU ARE

PUTTING IN FRONT OF US IS

REAL AND IS ACCURATE AND IS

SUBSTANTIATED AND NOW THEY

KNOW THAT THAT WAS NOT THE

CASE AT ALL.

THAT THEY WERE GIVEN THINGS

THAT HAD HUGE HOLES IN THEM

AND ASKED TO SIGN OFF ON

THEM.

>> YEAH.

I'M GLAD TO SEE THE FIS

COURT COME OUT AND MAKE A

STATEMENT.

YOUR VIEWERS NEED TO KNOW

THAT THE FIS COURT IS ALSO

CULPABLE IN THIS MADNESS,

ALSO.

>> Martha: HOW SO?

>> I SAY THAT BECAUSE WE

SENT THEM TWO LETTERS, VERY

SPECIFIC LETTERS.

SO THIS IS PROBABLY PEOPLE

HEARING THIS FOR THE FIRST

TIME.

WE SENT ONE, I BELIEVE, IN

FEBRUARY OF 2018, WARNING

THEM OF VERY SERIOUS

MATTERS, IT WAS BASED ON THE

MEMO THAT WE HAD PUT FORWARD

AT THAT TIME.

THEY DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

ABOUT IT.

THEN AGAIN, WHEN WE FOUND

OUT THAT SOURCE TWO, THE

ONLY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION,

OKAY, THAT WAS THERE, IT WAS

ESSENTIALLY THE -- IT WAS

THE DOSSIER.

>> Martha: RIGHT.

>> FAKE NEWS STORIES THAT

THEY USED AND SOURCE TOO.

WE ASSUMED WHEN WE WROTE THE

ORIGINAL MEMO THAT SOURCE

TWO WAS LEGITIMATE BUT LATER

TREY GOWDY WHO YOU WILL HAVE

ON IN A LITTLE BIT AND

MYSELF AND JOHN RATCLIFFE

AND OUR INVESTIGATIVE TEAM,

WE BEGAN TO LOOK AT SOURCE

2.

AND WE DISCOVERED NUMBER ONE

THAT THEY HAD ACTUALLY BEGUN

SPYING BEFORE THEY EVEN GOT

THE WARRANT.

BUT, NUMBER TWO, THEY LEFT

ALL OF THIS EXCULPATORY

EVIDENCE.

THIS IS EVIDENCE THAT THEY

SHOULD HAVE PUT FORWARD ON

BOTH PAIGE AND PAPADOPOULOS.

PAPADOPOULOS IS KEY BECAUSE

HE IS THE REASONABLE THAT

THEY STARTED THE ENTIRE

INVESTIGATION.

HE DENIED IT CLEARLY.

SO, AT THAT POINT, WHEN YOU

HAVE A FULL BLOWN CI

INVESTIGATION GOING ON, YOU

SHOULD DO SOMETHING.

THE POINT HERE MARTHA IS

THAT THE COURT KNEW ABOUT

ALL OF THIS.

SO, I'M NOT SAYING THAT I'M

GLAD THEY HAVE ACTED.

I'M GLAD THEY SAID

SOMETHING, BUT I THINK THE

COURT HAS TO BE ENDED.

THIS IS NOT --

>> Martha: I WAS GOING TO

ASK BECAUSE TOMORROW I'M

GOING TO INTERVIEW THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL.

WILLIAM BARR.

AND WE'RE GOING TO TALK

ABOUT THIS.

DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE FIS

COURT SHOULD BE ELIMINATED

AS ANDREW NAPOLITANO -- THE

JUDGE HAS ALSO ADVISED ON

THIS SHOW.

>> YEAH.

WE NEED A PROCESS, OKAY.

SO I'M NOT GOING TO SPEAK IN

ABSOLUTES.

BUT I WILL SAY THAT THE WAY

THE COURTS CONDUCTED

THEMSELVES IS TOTALLY

INAPPROPRIATE.

THEY IGNORED CLEAR EVIDENCE

THAT WE PRESENTED TO THEM

THAT, REMEMBER, THEY HAD

THIS.

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DIDN'T

HAVE IT.

WE HAD SEEN IT.

THEY HAD IT.

THEY DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

ABOUT IT.

SO, THEY HAVE LEFT REALLY

CONGRESS NO CHOICE BUT TO

HAVE TO STEP IN AND FIX THIS

PROCESS.

>> Martha: LET ME ASK YOU

THIS, WERE THERE PARTICULAR

JUDGES ON THE FIS COURT THAT

YOU FEEL DID NOT TREAT THIS

PROPERLY?

>> WELL, LOOK, WHEN YOU HAVE

THE EVIDENCE THAT WE PRESENT

TO THEM AND THEY DO NOTHING

ABOUT IT AND NOW THEY COME

OUT AND I HAVE TO LOOK

CLOSELY AT THE LETTER THAT

THEY SENT OUT TODAY, THE

STATEMENT THAT THEY SENT

OUT, BECAUSE I'M NOT SO SURE

THAT THEY ARE BEING ENTIRELY

TRUTHFUL.

I HAVE READ WHAT WE SENT

THEM.

I JUST READ IT A FEW HOURS

AGO BACK IN THE SUMMER OF

2018, THEY HAD A LOT OF THIS

INFORMATION THAT THEY CLAIM

THEY JUST FOUND OUT ABOUT.

I HAVE TO LOOK CLOSELY AT

THE WORDING.

>> Martha: VERY INTERESTING.

WE WOULD LOVE FOR YOU TO

COME BACK AND TALK ABOUT

THAT SOME MORE WHEN YOU MAKE

THAT COMPARISON BETWEEN WHAT

THEY ARE SAYING AND WHAT YOU

TOLD THEM AND MADE CLEAR TO

THEM BACK THEN.

I WANT TO ASK YOU ONE LAST

QUESTION WITH REGARD TO

UKRAINE.

BECAUSE YOU TALKED ABOUT THE

RUSSIA SITUATION AND

UKRAINE.

RUDY GIULIANI, THE

PRESIDENT'S ATTORNEY, IS,

YOU KNOW, HAS BEEN BACK IN

UKRAINE.

HE SAYS THAT HAS A LOT OF

INFORMATION THAT WILL PROVE

THAT THERE WAS, INDEED, A

UKRAINE ELEMENT TO MEDDLING

IN THE ELECTION.

IN FACT, HE IS ARGUING, I

BELIEVE, THAT IT WAS UKRAINE

AND NOT RUSSIA.

HE SAYS THAT HE NEEDED TO

GET YANK

GET YOVK

GET YOVANOVITCH.

OUT OF THE WAY BECAUSE SHE

WAS APPROVING OF THE

SITUATION THERE WHAT DO YOU

THINK OF THAT.

>> I HAVE NOT SEEN RUDY

GIULIANI SAY RUSSIA DID

MEDDLE IN

DIDDLE IN

DIDNLE IN

DIDN'T IN

DIDN'TMEN

DIDN'TMEDDLE IN THIS ELECTION.

IT'S CLEAR THAT RUSSIA HAS

MEDDLE YOU HAD IN OUR

ELECTION AND WILL CONTINUE

TO MEDDLE IN OUR ELECTION AS

WILL OTHER COUNTRIES.

THE KEY POINT HERE IS THAT

ABOUT UKRAINE.

THERE WAS NO QUESTION THAT

THE DEMOCRATS HAD PAID

OPERATIVES THAT WERE GETTING

INFORMATION OUT OF UKRAINE.

YOU ONLY HAVE TO LOOK AT

PAUL MANAFORT.

PAUL MANAFORT WAS DIRTIED UP

BY WHAT WAS LIKELY

DISINFORMATION.

NOW, LOOK, HE ENDED UP DOING

OTHER THINGS WRONG, BUT THAT

INITIALING DIRT THAT CAME

FROM UKRAINE.

WE ALSO KNOW THAT THE

DOSSIER SOURCES, SOME OF

THOSE SOURCES WERE IN

UKRAINE.

SO, THERE IS NO QUESTION --

I'M NOT SAYING THAT THE

UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT HAD

SOME NOT LIKE PUTIN WAS

DOING, BUT, LOOK, THEY

CLEARLY SIDED ON BEHALF OF

THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN AND

THEY HELPED TO DIRTY UP

TRUMP.

YOU HAD THE AMBASSADOR OF

IRK IN THE UNITED

UKK IN THE UNITED

UKRAIN THE UNITED

UKRAINETHE UNITED

UKRAINE IE UNITED

UKRAINE IN UNITED

UKRAINE IN TNITED

UKRAINE IN THETED

UKRAINE IN THE UD

UKRAINE IN THE UNITED STATES

IN WASHINGTON, D.C. SAYING

NEGATIVE THINGS ABOUT A

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE.

WHICH IS ALMOST UNHEARD OF.

AS IT RELATES TO

YOVANOVITCH, THE ISSUE THERE

IS THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE

THERE THAT -- IN UKRAINE,

THAT WANT VISAS TO COME TO

THE UNITED STATES SO THEY

CAN PRESENT EVIDENCE TO THE

APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES,

WHETHER IT BE CONGRESS OR

THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

AND THAT'S THE PROBLEM.

AND THAT'S WHAT RUDY

GIULIANI IS SAYING THAT

THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT WANT

TO GIVE US INFORMATION THAT

CANNOT DO IT.

>> Martha: OKAY.