AND MISDEMEANORS BUT DIDN'T ALL AGREE IT WAS ENOUGH FOR

AGREE IT WAS ENOUGH FOR IMPEACHMENT.

IMPEACHMENT. >> FACTS BEFORE US ARE CLEAR.

>> FACTS BEFORE US ARE CLEAR. PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ONLY

PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT ONLY SEEK TO BENEFIT FROM FOREIGN

SEEK TO BENEFIT FROM FOREIGN INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTIONS.

INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTIONS. >> SEEING WHY MOST PEOPLE DON'T

>> SEEING WHY MOST PEOPLE DON'T GO TO LAW SCHOOL NO OFFENSE TO

GO TO LAW SCHOOL NO OFFENSE TO THE PROFESSORS.

THE PROFESSORS. THEY ARE BRINGING YOU IN MOST OF

THEY ARE BRINGING YOU IN MOST OF YOU HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT OUT OF

YOU HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT OUT OF CLASSROOMS YOU ARE GETTING

CLASSROOMS YOU ARE GETTING FINALS IN TO THE CHANCE YOU --

FINALS IN TO THE CHANCE YOU -- UNLESS YOU WERE WATCHING TV IN

UNLESS YOU WERE WATCHING TV IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS, YOU

THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS, YOU COULDN'T HAVE POSSIBLY DIGESTED

COULDN'T HAVE POSSIBLY DIGESTED THE ADAM SCHIFF REPORT OR

THE ADAM SCHIFF REPORT OR RESPONSE IN ANY WAY.

RESPONSE IN ANY WAY. WE CAN BE THEORETICAL ALL WE

WE CAN BE THEORETICAL ALL WE WANT BUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

WANT BUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL LOOK AT THIS AND SAY, HUH?

WILL LOOK AT THIS AND SAY, HUH? >> THE BASIS OF THE TESTIMONY

>> THE BASIS OF THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE BEFORE THE HOUSE,

AND EVIDENCE BEFORE THE HOUSE, PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS COMMITTED

PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS COMMITTED IMPEACHABLE HIGH CRIMES AND

IMPEACHABLE HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS BY CORRUPTLY

MISDEMEANORS BY CORRUPTLY ABUSING THE OFFICE OF THE

ABUSING THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY.

PRESIDENCY. >> I'M CONCERNED ABOUT LOWERING

>> I'M CONCERNED ABOUT LOWERING IMPEACHMENT STANDARDS AND OH

IMPEACHMENT STANDARDS AND OH PAUCITY OF EVIDENCE AND ANGER.

PAUCITY OF EVIDENCE AND ANGER. I BELIEVE IT SATISFIES STANDARDS

I BELIEVE IT SATISFIES STANDARDS OF IMPEACHMENT BUT CREATE A

OF IMPEACHMENT BUT CREATE A DANGEROUS PRECEDENT FOR FUTURE

DANGEROUS PRECEDENT FOR FUTURE IMPEACHMENTS.

IMPEACHMENTS. >> MR. COLLINS, I WOULD LIKE TO

>> MR. COLLINS, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY TO YOU I READ TRANSCRIPTS OF

SAY TO YOU I READ TRANSCRIPTS OF EVERY WITNESS WHO APPEARED IN

EVERY WITNESS WHO APPEARED IN THE LIVE HEARINGS BECAUSE I

THE LIVE HEARINGS BECAUSE I WOULD NOT SPEAK ABOUT THESE

WOULD NOT SPEAK ABOUT THESE THINGS WITHOUT REVIEWING THE

THINGS WITHOUT REVIEWING THE FACTS.

FACTS. I'M INSULTED BY THE SUGGESTION

I'M INSULTED BY THE SUGGESTION AS A LAW PROFESSOR I DON'T CARE

AS A LAW PROFESSOR I DON'T CARE ABOUT THOSE FACTS.

ABOUT THOSE FACTS. EVERYTHING I READ ON THOSE

EVERYTHING I READ ON THOSE OCCASIONS TELLS ME WHEN

OCCASIONS TELLS ME WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP INVITED, INDEED

PRESIDENT TRUMP INVITED, INDEED DEMANDED FOREIGN INVOLVEMENT AT

DEMANDED FOREIGN INVOLVEMENT AT OUR UPCOMING ELECTION HE STRUCK

OUR UPCOMING ELECTION HE STRUCK AT THE VERY HEART AT WHICH MAKES

AT THE VERY HEART AT WHICH MAKES THIS A PUBLIC WE PLEDGE

THIS A PUBLIC WE PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE.

ALLEGIANCE. THAT DEMAND AS PROFESSOR FELDMAN

THAT DEMAND AS PROFESSOR FELDMAN JUST EXPLAINED, CONSTITUTED AN

JUST EXPLAINED, CONSTITUTED AN ABUSE OF POWER.

ABUSE OF POWER. >> IN THIS COUNTRY NO ONE IS

>> IN THIS COUNTRY NO ONE IS KING.

KING. WE APPLIED THE PRINCIPLE SINCE

WE APPLIED THE PRINCIPLE SINCE THE FOUNDING OF THE CONSTITUTION

THE FOUNDING OF THE CONSTITUTION AND RECOGNIZED AROUND THE WORLD

AND RECOGNIZED AROUND THE WORLD IS A FIXED INSPIRING AMERICAN

IS A FIXED INSPIRING AMERICAN IDEAL.

IDEAL. >> THIS IMPEACHMENT WOULD RIVAL

>> THIS IMPEACHMENT WOULD RIVAL THE JOHNSON IMPEACHMENT AS THE

THE JOHNSON IMPEACHMENT AS THE SHORTEST IN HISTORY DEPENDING

SHORTEST IN HISTORY DEPENDING HOW ONE COUNTS THE RELEVANT

HOW ONE COUNTS THE RELEVANT DAYS.

DAYS. MY KIDS ARE MAD, EVEN MY DOG

MY KIDS ARE MAD, EVEN MY DOG SEEMS MAD, AND LUNA'S A GOLDEN

SEEMS MAD, AND LUNA'S A GOLDEN DOODLE AND THEY DON'T GET MAD.

DOODLE AND THEY DON'T GET MAD. WILL A SLIPSHOD IMPEACHMENT MAKE

WILL A SLIPSHOD IMPEACHMENT MAKE US LESS MAD?

US LESS MAD? WILL IT ONLY INVITE AN

WILL IT ONLY INVITE AN INVITATION TO FOLLOW EVERY

INVITATION TO FOLLOW EVERY FUTURE ADMINISTRATION AS A

FUTURE ADMINISTRATION AS A MANDATE?

MANDATE? THAT IS WHY THIS IS WRONG.

THAT IS WHY THIS IS WRONG. >> THERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL

>> THERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS

HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED IN THE

SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED IN THE TEXT, CORRECT?

TEXT, CORRECT? >> YES, THAT'S TRUE.

>> YES, THAT'S TRUE. >> WHAT ARE THEY?

>> WHAT ARE THEY? >> TREES SON ANDASON AND BRIBERY

>> TREES SON ANDASON AND BRIBERY >> DO PRESIDENTS ATTEMPTS AT

>> DO PRESIDENTS ATTEMPTS AT UKRAINE ESTABLISH THE HIGH

UKRAINE ESTABLISH THE HIGH CRIMES OF BRIBERY?

CRIMES OF BRIBERY? >> YES, THEY DO.

>> YES, THEY DO. >> THE MUELLER REPORT CITE AS

>> THE MUELLER REPORT CITE AS NUMBER OF FACTS THAT THE

NUMBER OF FACTS THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE, IMPEACHABLE

OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE, IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.

OFFENSE. >> A PRESIDENT WHO WILL NOT

>> A PRESIDENT WHO WILL NOT COOPERATE IN AN IMPEACHMENT

COOPERATE IN AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY IS PUTTING HIMSELF ABOVE

INQUIRY IS PUTTING HIMSELF ABOVE THE LAW.

THE LAW. >> IMAGINE A BANK ROBBERY, THE

>> IMAGINE A BANK ROBBERY, THE POLICE COME AND THE PERSON IS IN

POLICE COME AND THE PERSON IS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BANK ROBBERY

THE MIDDLE OF THE BANK ROBBERY AND THE PERSON THEN DROPS THE

AND THE PERSON THEN DROPS THE MONEY AND SAYS, I WILL LEAVE

MONEY AND SAYS, I WILL LEAVE WITHOUT THE MONEY.

WITHOUT THE MONEY. EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS THAT'S

EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS THAT'S BURGLARY.

BURGLARY. FORGET I WILL GET IT RIGHT.

FORGET I WILL GET IT RIGHT. IN THIS SITUATION, WE HAVE

IN THIS SITUATION, WE HAVE SOMEBODY CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF

SOMEBODY CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF IT.

IT. THAT DOESN'T EXCUSE THE PERSON

THAT DOESN'T EXCUSE THE PERSON FROM THE CONSEQUENCE.

FROM THE CONSEQUENCE. IMPEACHMENTS HAVE TO BE BASED ON

IMPEACHMENTS HAVE TO BE BASED ON TRUTH, NOT PRESUMPTION.

TRUTH, NOT PRESUMPTION. THAT'S THE PROBLEM, WHEN YOU

THAT'S THE PROBLEM, WHEN YOU MOVE TOWARDS IMPEACHMENT ON THIS

MOVE TOWARDS IMPEACHMENT ON THIS ABBREVIATED SCHEDULE THAT HAS

ABBREVIATED SCHEDULE THAT HAS NOT BEEN EXPLAINED TO ME WHY YOU

NOT BEEN EXPLAINED TO ME WHY YOU WANT TO SET THE RECORD FOR THE

WANT TO SET THE RECORD FOR THE FASTEST IMPEACHMENT.

FASTEST IMPEACHMENT. >> DID YOU WRITE AN ARTICLE,"

>> DID YOU WRITE AN ARTICLE," IT'S HARD TO TAKE IMPEACHMENT

IT'S HARD TO TAKE IMPEACHMENT SERIOUSLY NOW?"

SERIOUSLY NOW?" >> YES, I WROTE THAT ARTICLE.

>> YES, I WROTE THAT ARTICLE. >> AND SINCE THE 2018 MIDTERM

>> AND SINCE THE 2018 MIDTERM ELECTION HOUSE DEMOCRATS HAVE

ELECTION HOUSE DEMOCRATS HAVE MADE IT PAINFULLY CLEAR

MADE IT PAINFULLY CLEAR DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT IS

DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT IS PRIMARILY OR EVEN EXCLUSIVELY A

PRIMARILY OR EVEN EXCLUSIVELY A TOOL TO WEAKEN PRESIDENT TRUMP'S

TOOL TO WEAKEN PRESIDENT TRUMP'S CHANCES IN 2020.

CHANCES IN 2020. DID YOU WRITE THOSE WORDS?

DID YOU WRITE THOSE WORDS? >> UNTIL THIS CALL ON JULY 25th,

>> UNTIL THIS CALL ON JULY 25th, I WAS AN IMPEACHMENT SKEPTIC.