>> Ed: THE PRESIDENT IS NOW ON

THE CLOCK OVER JUST HOW HE WILL

HANDLE THE UPCOMING IMPEACHMENT

PROCEEDINGS.

HOUSE JUDICIARY CHAIR JUST SENT

THE PRESIDENT A LETTER SAYING HE

HAS EXACTLY ONE WEEK FROM

TONIGHT TO DECIDE IF HE WILL

CALL WITNESSES AND PRESENT

EVIDENCE OF HIS OWN.

THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS

HAVING ITS FIRST IMPEACHMENT IN

HEARING WEDNESDAY.

GOOD TO HAVE YOU WITH US,

CONGRESSMAN.

>> HAPPY THANKSGIVING.

>> Ed: WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF

JERRY NADLER SAYING,

MR. PRESIDENT, YOU HAVE ONE WEEK

TO DECIDE IF YOU'RE GOING TO

MOUNT A DEFENSE?

WHAT IS YOUR ADVICE TO THE

PRESIDENT?

>> NO, HE NEEDS TO BE ADVISED

WHAT THE CHARGES ARE.

THERE ARE NO CHARGES.

THEY TALKED ABOUT, WELL,

JERRY NADLER HAS CONTINUED TO

TALK ABOUT COLLUSION BUT THERE I

TALK ABOUT COLLUSION BUT THERE S

NO

COLLISION AND AS WE KNOW, IT IS

NOT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WHEN

YOU KNOW YOU ARE INNOCENT AND

YOU ARE TRYING TO GET THE TRUTH

OUT ABOUT YOUR INNOCENCE, AND

YOU GOT PEOPLE LIKE

ROBERT MUELLER AND ADAM SCHIFF

WHO WERE TRYING TO GET OUT LIES.

THAT IS NOT OBSTRUCTION.

>> YOU MENTIONED MUELLER.

I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT

JERRY NADLER IS BRINGING UP THE

MUELLER REPORT WHICH I THOUGHT

WAS IN THE REARVIEW MIRROR AND

SAYING WE STILL MAY BE LOOKING

AT OBSTRUCTION AND ARTICLE

IMPEACHMENT.

LET'S REVIEW VIEWERS WHAT

JERRY NADLER SAID ABOUT

OBSTRUCTION IN JULY IN JULY.

>> WE FOUND A GREAT DEAL OF

COLLUSION, IT FOUND A GREAT DEAL

OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY THE

PRESIDENT, AND IT POINTED TO

REFUSE TO EXONERATE THE

PRESIDENT.

WE THINK IT IS VERY IMPORTANT

FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO HEAR

DIRECTLY WHAT THE FACTS ARE

BECAUSE THIS IS A PRESIDENT WHO

HAS VIOLATED THE LAW SIX WAYS

FROM SUNDAY.

IF ANYONE ELSE HAD BEEN ACCUSED

OF WHAT THE REPORT FINDS THE

PRESIDENT HAD DONE, THEY

WOULD'VE BEEN INDICTED.

>> Ed: THIS IS THE MAN WHO WAS

GOING TO BE RUNNING THE

IMPEACHMENT DEAL AND MOVING

FORWARD AND HE SAID ON FOX NEWS

SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONA

SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIOND

SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONT

SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONE

SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONW

SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONS

OBSTRUCTION.

>> I GUESS THAT TELLS YOU WHY MY

FRIEND JERRY WAS NOT RUNNING THE

IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS FOR A WHILE

THERE.

>> Ed: HE WAS SORT OF

SIDELINED BY NANCY PELOSI.

>> SIDELINED MY FOOT.

HE WAS COMPLETELY TAKEN OUT OF

THE PICTURE SO THAT SCHIFF COULD

DO HIS SCHIFF SHOW.

ANYWAY, IF WE ARE GOING TO GET

TO THE TRUTH, LIKE HE SAYS HE

WANTS TO HEAR, THERE ARE THREE

WITNESSES THAT ARE ABSOLUTELY

CRITICAL IN MY OPINION, AND THAT

INCLUDES THE NONWHISTLEBLOWER

WHISTLEBLOWER.

IT INCLUDES ABIGAIL GRACE, WHO

WAS CLOSE FRIENDS WITH THE

NONWHISTLEBLOWER, AND SEAN

MISKO.

ALL THREE OF THOSE WORKED AT THE

NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL.

THEY ALL WORKED WITH BIDEN AND

WORKED WITH --

>> Ed: WHEN HE WAS

VICE PRESIDENT.

>> MY OPINION IS BASED ON THE

FACTS.

I THINK THE NONWHISTLEBLOWER RAN

TO THEM, WHO WORKED FOR SCHIFF

AT THE TIME, AND SAID, MY GOSH,

DO YOU HEAR THE CONVERSATION

TRUMP HAD WITH THE NEW UKRAINIAN

PRESIDENT?

WANTS TO GET RID OF CORRUPTION.

HE WANTS THE EVIDENCE, WE ARE

GOING TO BE COOKED IF HE GETS

THE EVIDENCE FROM UKRAINE.

THEY SAID, WHAT DO WE DO?

THE ANSWER IS, WE WILL MAKE YOU

A WHISTLEBLOWER.

BUT I DIDN'T HEAR ANY DIRECT

EVIDENCE.

WE WILL GET THE IG CHANGE THE

RULES SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE

DIRECT EVIDENCE.

WE NEED ABIGAIL GRACE, JOHN

MISKO, THE NONWHISTLEBLOWER

WHISTLEBLOWER.

>> Ed: WHAT ABOUT HUNTER

BIDEN?

BECAUSE THAT IS MORE OF A

SIDESHOW BECAUSE THE REAL

CORRUPTION IS NOT WITH HUNTER

BIDEN.

HE WASN'T IN A GOVERNMENT

POSITION.

THE QUESTION IS JOE BIDEN.

AND THEY ARE SAYING, OH, THIS IS

BRIBERY.

THAT MEANS INFORMATION HAS TO BE

CONSIDERED AS MONETARY, AND

SUPREME COURT MADE CLEAR IT IS

NOT A POLITICAL GIFT, BUT THE

REAL TRICK IS IF INFORMATION IS

A BRIBE, THEN, ALL OF THAT

INFORMATION IN THE HILLARY

CAMPAIGN GOT FROM UKRAINIANS,

THAT MAKES THEM GUILTY OF

BRIBERY.

>> Ed: BUT THE DEMOCRATS SAY

THAT IS A CONSPIRACY THEORY,

THAT UKRAINE WAS NOT INVOLVED IN

INTERFERING.

THAT IT IS ALL ABOUT RUSSIA

ABOUT RUSSIA.

>> YEAH, WELL, IT DID INVOLVE

RUSSIA.

IT DID INVOLVE SOME UKRAINIANS

AND I'M CAREFUL NOT TO SAY

UKRAINE, BUT SOME UKRAINIANS AND

THAT IS WHAT PRESIDENT ZELENSKY

WANTS TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF.

BUT LOOK AT IT FROM THE

NONWHISTLEBLOWER AND ABIGAIL

GRACE AND SHAWN MISKO WERE

INVOLVED IN THIS WHOLE THING,

BUDDIES WITH BRANDON

McMASTERS.

IF YOU LOOK AT THEIR POSITION,

THIS IS A TWO FOR FOR THEM.

BUT YOU STOP ZELENSKY FROM

TAKING THE INFORMATION AND

GETTING THEM IN TROUBLE AND

ALSO, YOU KEEP TRUMP OCCUPIED.

>> Ed: LAST QUESTION, DO YOU

THINK IT IS A FOREGONE

CONCLUSION THAT THE DEMOCRATS

COULD HAVE A HOLD ON

IMPEACHMENT?

OR ARE THEY GETTING NERVOUS?

>> THAT IS AN ABSOLUTELY GREAT

QUESTION.

I JUST THINK, SAY WHAT YOU WILL

ABOUT NANCY PELOSI, SHE IS NOT

POLITICALLY STUPID.

SHE KNOWS IF YOU TAKE THIS VOTE,

THEY ARE GOING TO GET THE VOTES,

SHE ALWAYS DOES.

AND THEN IT GOES TO THE SENATE,

AND NANCY PELOSI WILL HAVE

HELPED REELECT DONALD TRUMP.

I CAN'T BELIEVE SHE WOULD WANT

TO DO THAT, BUT HER LEFT WING,

THEY PUSHED HER INTO IT ANYWAY.

>> Ed: A LOT OF EXCITING DAYS

AHEAD.

YOU WILL BE RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE