>> Bill: BRING IN NEWT GINGRICH

FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR AUTHOR OF

A NEW BOOK CALLED "TRUMP VERSUS

CHINA."

CRANKING THOSE THINGS OUT EVERY

THREE MONTHS.

CONGRATULATIONS AGAIN.

IT STRIKES ME BASED ON

YESTERDAY YOU HAVE TO HAVE A

PUBLIC HEARING IN ORDER FOR

DEMOCRATS TO SAY HERE IS OUR

CARDS.

WE'LL SHOW YOU OUR HAND.

>> THE FIRST QUESTION TO PELOSI

IS WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF?

THIS GUY GOES IN, REPUTABLE

FOREIGN OFFICER, HE GIVES

TESTIMONY, I READ HIS WRITTEN

STATEMENT THIS MORNING.

AND THE REPUBLICANS WALK OUT

AND SAY WITHIN MINUTES THEY HAD

DEMOLISHED HIS ENTIRE TESTIMONY.

NOW, THEN THEY SAY BY THE WAY,

WE CANNOT TELL YOU ANYTHING

ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED.

YOU HAVE TO SAY TO YOURSELF WHY

IS IT THAT PELOSI AND SCHIFF

BELIEVE THAT THEY HAVE TO MAKE

A CASE IN SECRET BECAUSE THEY

CAN'T DEFEND IT IN PUBLIC AND

OF COURSE WHAT THEY'RE DOING BY

SELECTIVELY -- THEY'RE SMEARING

THE PRESIDENT.

THEY THINK IN THE LONG RUN

THEY'RE WEAKENING HIM.

I DON'T.

WHAT LINDSEY GRAHAM IS DOING IN

THE SENATE TO WORK ON A

RESOLUTION TO SAY THE WHOLE

THING IS A CHARADE AND THE

SENATE SHOULDN'T CONSIDER

TAKING IT UP DOING IT DONE IN A

WAY THAT WAS OUTLAWED.

THE SECRET HEARING WAS OUTLAWED

IN 1641.

IT IS INHERENTLY TO THE

ADVANTAGE OF THE STATE TO CRUSH

THE INDIVIDUAL.

SO WE HAVE NOT SEEN ANYTHING

LIKE THIS IN ALMOST 400 YEARS.

>> Bill: GET BACK TO THE POINT

ABOUT SELECTIVE LEAKING.

THE STRATEGY SEEMS TO BE

WORKING.

THERE WAS A POLL THAT CAME OUT

THIS MORNING THAT SAY 55% OF

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NOW FAVOR

THE IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.

IF THAT'S YOUR STRATEGY IT

SEEMS TO BE GOING THE WAY THEY

WANT IT TO GO.

>> IF THE ELECTION WERE NEXT

THURSDAY IT MIGHT BE A GOOD

STRATEGY.

THE ELECTION ISN'T NEXT

THURSDAY.

WE WENT THROUGH THE WHOLE CYCLE

WITH RUSSIA AND MUELLER AND

EVERYBODY RUNNING IN CIRCLES

AND IT FADED AWAY.

NOW WE HAVE A NEW DEAL AND WE

HAVE SCHIFF INSTEAD OF MUELLER

AND WE HAVE A TOTALLY RIGGED

GAME.

IT IS ALL BEING DONE IN SECRET.

IT CAN'T STAY IN SECRET.

IT HAS TO COME OUT AT SOME

POINT.

THEN YOU HAVE TO FIND OUT AS WE

DID WITH THE WHISTLEBLOWER WHO

JUST DISAPPEARED.

THEY CAN'T BRING THE

WHISTLEBLOWER OUT BECAUSE HE

HAS NOTHING TO BLOW.

HE KNEW NOTHING PERSONALLY.

NOW HOW CAN YOU TAKE THAT AS A

SERIOUS CREDIBLE CHARGE?

>> Bill: YOU READ THE INTRO

THAT BILL TAYLOR READ YESTERDAY.

IT LASTED AN HOUR.

YOU WENT THROUGH IT, I WENT

THROUGH IT.

WHAT WAS YOUR TAKE ON IT?

>> MY TAKE IS THERE IS A VERY

SMART MAN WHO BELIEVED IN A

CERTAIN WORLDVIEW IN A CERTAIN

PROCEDURE BUT THE TRUTH IS

FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT USED

PERSONAL ASSISTANCE.

WOODROW WILSON DID.

THIS IDEA THAT SOMEHOW TRUMP IS

DOING SOMETHING UNIQUE IS A

PURELY MADE UP BUNCH OF BALONEY.

I PRESUME TAYLOR DOESN'T LIKE

TRUMP'S STYLE AND DISAGREED

WITH HIS POLLZ. ALL RIGHT SO

SAY I DISAGREED.

DOESN'T MAKE IT IMPEACHABLE.

>> Bill: RECALLING THE

AMBASSADOR IN MAY AS WELL.

>> ALL AMBASSADORS SERVE AT THE

PLEASURE OF THE PRESIDENT,

PERIOD.

>> Bill: MITCH MCCONNELL I

THINK WHEN YOU WATCH HIS

STATEMENTS AND READ HIS WORDS

CAREFULLY THEY CAN BE REVEALING.

HERE IS PART OF WHAT HE SAID

YESTERDAY ON THE HILL.

>> UNLIKE OTHER PROCEDURES IN

THE SENATE, THE MAJORITY LEADER

DOES NOT REALLY HAVE BALL

CONTROL HERE.

WHEN IT COMES OVER FROM THE

HOUSE, WE HAVE TO TAKE IT UP.

I HAVE NO IDEA HOW LONG THIS

WILL GO ON.

>> Bill: I'M CONFUSED BY THAT.

IT SEEMS LIKE HE IS OPENING THE

DOOR TO THIS.

HE LATER REFERENCES JUSTICE

ROBERTS.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE U.S.

SUPREME COURT.

THE WAY THE RULES OF

IMPEACHMENT PROCEED IN THE

SENATE, TWO WEEKS AGO HE HAD A

FACEBOOK POST SAYING AS LONG AS

I'M SENATE MAJORITY LEADER

IMPEACHMENT GOES NOWHERE.

HE SAID BY THE RULES WE HAVE TO

TAKE UP IMPEACHMENT.

THE QUESTION IS HOW LONG WE

SPEND ON IT.

I DIDN'T HEAR THAT SAME ANSWER

YESTERDAY.

IS SOMETHING CHANGING WITH HIM?

>> WHO KNOWS?

MITCH MCCONNELL IS AN

EXTRAORDINARILY SMART MANAGER

OF THE SENATE AND HAS A PRETTY

GOOD SENSE OF WHERE HIS MEMBERS

ARE.

HE HAS A FEELING AND I'VE

GOTTEN THIS FROM SEVERAL

SENATORS, THIS IS A POINT TO BE

WISE AND CALM AND JUDICIOUS,

DRAW THE CONTRAST WITH THE

DEMOCRATS IN THE HOUSE.

BUT THE SENATE ALWAYS HAS THE

OPPORTUNITY TO SAY THAT THERE

IS NOTHING HERE.

IF A GRAND JURY REPORTS AND THE

HOUSE IS A GRAND JURY IN THIS

SETTING.

IF A GRAND JURY UTTERS

SOMETHING, THE SENATE CAN TURN

AND SAY NO, WE DON'T BELIEVE IT

AND WE AREN'T TAKING IT UP.

THEY WOULD TAKE IT UP LONG

ENOUGH TO DISMISS IT.

>> Bill: WHICH COULD BE FIVE

MINUTES OR A MONTH OR LONGER.

>> RIGHT.

AND MCCONNELL SAID LOOK IN A

WORST CASE YOU'LL BE HERE ALL

OF DECEMBER.

CLEAR YOUR SCHEDULES FOR ALL OF

DECEMBER.

>> Bill: TULSI GABBARD GOING

AFTER HILLARY CLINTON OF BEING

A RUSSIAN AGENT.

HERE IS WHAT SHE SAID IN RETURN

YESTERDAY.

>> HILLARY CLINTON, YOUR

FOREIGN POLICY HAS BEEN A

DISASTER FOR OUR COUNTRY AND

THE WORLD.

IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO

ACKNOWLEDGE THE DAMAGE THAT

YOU'VE CAUSED.

IT IS LONG PAST TIME FOR YOU TO

STEP DOWN FROM YOUR THRONE SO

THE DEMOCRATIC CAN LEAD WITH A

NEW FOREIGN POLICY.

>> Bill: IT STRIKES ME THAT

PUTIN IS LIVING DEEP IN THE

HEADS OF ALL AMERICANS.

RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND

COLLUSION AND ON AND ON.

AND THIS IS MORE EVIDENCE OF IT.

>> I DON'T THINK PUTIN EXISTS

MUCH IN THE UKRAINE CASE.

THAT'S ABOUT CORRUPTION IN

UKRAINE THAT WOULD EXIST

WITHOUT RUSSIA.

I THINK PUTIN DOES EXIST DEEP

IN HILLARY'S HEAD.

SHE REACHED THE CONCLUSION SHE

COULDN'T POSSIBLY HAVE LOST SO

THE RUSSIANS MUST HAVE STOLEN

IT AND THEREFORE IT'S THE

RUSSIANS' FAULT.

BUT THIS IS VERY SIMILAR TO

WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE HOUSE.

SOMEBODY SHOULD SAY TO HILLARY

CLINTON, SHOW US YOUR PROOF.

YOU MADE A TERRIBLE CHARGE

AGAINST A MEMBER OF CONGRESS

WHO IS A MILITARY VETERAN.

THE BURDEN IS ON YOU, HILLARY,

TO PROVE WHAT YOU JUST SAID AND

THE SAME THING IS TRUE IN THE

HOUSE.

PEOPLE SHOULD SAY TO SCHIFF AND

PELOSI YOU DON'T HAVE THE GUTS

TO DO IT IN PUBLIC.

WHY SHOULD WE TAKE YOU

SERIOUSLY?

>> WE'LL SEE IF IT GOES PUBLIC.

MY GUESS IS IT HAS TO.

MR. SPEAKER, THANK YOU VERY