中級 30 タグ追加 保存
動画の字幕をクリックしてすぐ単語の意味を調べられます!
単語帳読み込み中…
字幕の修正報告
NEWS THAN ANY OTHER NEWS ORGANIZATION IN THE WORLD.
ORGANIZATION IN THE WORLD. >>> TODAY FOR THE FIRST TIME
>>> TODAY FOR THE FIRST TIME OUSTED U.S. AMBASSADOR MARIE
OUSTED U.S. AMBASSADOR MARIE YOVANOVITCH TOLD HER SIDE OF THE
YOVANOVITCH TOLD HER SIDE OF THE STORY PUBLICLY.
STORY PUBLICLY. LAWMAKERS AND LEGAL COUNSEL BOTH
LAWMAKERS AND LEGAL COUNSEL BOTH SIDES ATTEMPTED TO PAINT A
SIDES ATTEMPTED TO PAINT A PICTURE.
PICTURE. >> GETTING RID OF AMBASSADOR
>> GETTING RID OF AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH HELPED SET THE STAGE
YOVANOVITCH HELPED SET THE STAGE FOR AN IRREGULAR CHANNEL THAT
FOR AN IRREGULAR CHANNEL THAT COULD SET THE PRECEDENT FOR TWO
COULD SET THE PRECEDENT FOR TWO PRESIDENTS.
PRESIDENTS. THE 2016 CONSPIRACY THEORY AND,
THE 2016 CONSPIRACY THEORY AND, MOST IMPORTANT, AN INVESTIGATION
MOST IMPORTANT, AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE 2020 POLITICAL OPPONENT
INTO THE 2020 POLITICAL OPPONENT HE APPARENTLY FEARED MOST, JOE
HE APPARENTLY FEARED MOST, JOE BIDEN.
BIDEN. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT THEIR
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT THEIR PRESIDENT TO USE THE AUTHORITY
PRESIDENT TO USE THE AUTHORITY THEY GRANT HIM IN THE SERVICE OF
THEY GRANT HIM IN THE SERVICE OF THE NATION, NOT TO DESTROY
THE NATION, NOT TO DESTROY OTHERS BUT TO ADVANCE HIS
OTHERS BUT TO ADVANCE HIS PERSONAL OR POLITICAL INTERESTS.
PERSONAL OR POLITICAL INTERESTS. IN FACT, DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN
IN FACT, DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN VOWING TO OUST PRESIDENT TRUMP
VOWING TO OUST PRESIDENT TRUMP SINCE THE DAY HE WAS ELECTED.
SINCE THE DAY HE WAS ELECTED. SO AMERICANS CAN RIGHTLY SUSPECT
SO AMERICANS CAN RIGHTLY SUSPECT THAT HIS PHONE CALL WITH
THAT HIS PHONE CALL WITH PRESIDENT ZELENSKY WAS USED AS
PRESIDENT ZELENSKY WAS USED AS AN EXCUSE FOR THE DEMOCRATS TO
AN EXCUSE FOR THE DEMOCRATS TO FULFILL THEIR WATERGATE
FULFILL THEIR WATERGATE FANTASIES.
FANTASIES. >> LIKE MY COLLEAGUES, I ENTERED
>> LIKE MY COLLEAGUES, I ENTERED THE FOREIGN SERVICE
THE FOREIGN SERVICE UNDERSTANDING THAT MY JOB WAS TO
UNDERSTANDING THAT MY JOB WAS TO IMPLEMENT THE FOREIGN POLICY
IMPLEMENT THE FOREIGN POLICY INTERESTS OF THIS NATION AS
INTERESTS OF THIS NATION AS DEFINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND
DEFINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS AND TO DO SO REGARDLESS
CONGRESS AND TO DO SO REGARDLESS OF WHICH PERSON OR PARTY WAS IN
OF WHICH PERSON OR PARTY WAS IN POWER.
POWER. I HAVE NO AGENDA OTHER THAN TO
I HAVE NO AGENDA OTHER THAN TO PURSUE OUR STATE THE FOREIGN
PURSUE OUR STATE THE FOREIGN POLICY GOALS.
POLICY GOALS. THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DID NOT
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DID NOT ASK ME TO HELP THE CLINTON
ASK ME TO HELP THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN OR HARM THE TRUMP
CAMPAIGN OR HARM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, NOR WOULD I HAVE TAKEN
CAMPAIGN, NOR WOULD I HAVE TAKEN ANY SUCH STEPS IF THEY HAD.
ANY SUCH STEPS IF THEY HAD. PARTNER
PARTNER PARTISANSHIP OF THIS TYPE IS NOT
PARTISANSHIP OF THIS TYPE IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH A CAREER FOREIGN
COMPATIBLE WITH A CAREER FOREIGN SERVICE OFFICER.
SERVICE OFFICER. WITH RESPECT TO MAYOR GIULIANI,
WITH RESPECT TO MAYOR GIULIANI, I HAVE ONLY HAD MINIMUM CONTACT
I HAVE ONLY HAD MINIMUM CONTACT WITH HIM, A TOTAL OF THREE.
WITH HIM, A TOTAL OF THREE. NONE RELATED TO THE EVENTS AT
NONE RELATED TO THE EVENTS AT ISSUE.
ISSUE. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND MR. GIULIANI'S MOTIVES FOR
MR. GIULIANI'S MOTIVES FOR ATTACKING ME NOR I CAN OFFER AN
ATTACKING ME NOR I CAN OFFER AN OPINION ON WHETHER HE BELIEVES
OPINION ON WHETHER HE BELIEVES THE ALLEGATIONS HE SPREAD ABOUT
THE ALLEGATIONS HE SPREAD ABOUT ME.
ME. CLEARLY NO ONE AT THE STATE
CLEARLY NO ONE AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT DID.
DEPARTMENT DID. WHAT I CAN SAY IS MR. GIULIANI
WHAT I CAN SAY IS MR. GIULIANI SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THOSE CLAIMS
SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THOSE CLAIMS WERE SUSPECT COMING AS THEY
WERE SUSPECT COMING AS THEY REPORTEDLY DID COMING FROM
REPORTEDLY DID COMING FROM QUESTIONS WITH QUESTIONABLE
QUESTIONS WITH QUESTIONABLE MOTIVES AND REASONS TO BELIEVE
MOTIVES AND REASONS TO BELIEVE THEIR POLITICAL AND FINANCIAL
THEIR POLITICAL AND FINANCIAL AMBITIONS WOULD BE STYMIED BY
AMBITIONS WOULD BE STYMIED BY OUR ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN
OUR ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN UKRAINE.
UKRAINE. OUR UKRAINE POLICY HAS BEEN
OUR UKRAINE POLICY HAS BEEN THROWN INTO DISARRAY AND SHADY
THROWN INTO DISARRAY AND SHADY INTERESTS THE WORLD OVER HAVE
INTERESTS THE WORLD OVER HAVE LEARNED HOW LITTLE IT TAKES TO
LEARNED HOW LITTLE IT TAKES TO REMOVE AN AMERICAN AMBASSADOR
REMOVE AN AMERICAN AMBASSADOR WHO DOES NOT GIVE THEM WHAT THEY
WHO DOES NOT GIVE THEM WHAT THEY WANT.
WANT. >> DID ANYONE AT THE STATE
>> DID ANYONE AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT EVER EXPRESS CONCERNS
DEPARTMENT EVER EXPRESS CONCERNS ABOUT YOUR JOB PERFORMANCE?
ABOUT YOUR JOB PERFORMANCE? >> NO.
>> NO. >> NOW, DURING THIS CONVERSATION
>> NOW, DURING THIS CONVERSATION DID THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TELL
DID THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TELL YOU ABOUT YOUR FUTURE AS THE
YOU ABOUT YOUR FUTURE AS THE AMBASSADOR TO UKRAINE?
AMBASSADOR TO UKRAINE? >> WELL, HE TOLD ME I NEEDED TO
>> WELL, HE TOLD ME I NEEDED TO LEAVE.
LEAVE. >> WHAT DID HE SAY?
>> WHAT DID HE SAY? >> THERE WAS A LOT OF BACK AND
>> THERE WAS A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH, BUT ULTIMATELY HE SAID
FORTH, BUT ULTIMATELY HE SAID THE WORDS THAT, YOU KNOW, EVERY
THE WORDS THAT, YOU KNOW, EVERY FOREIGN SERVICE OFFICER
FOREIGN SERVICE OFFICER UNDERSTANDS, THE PRESIDENT HAS
UNDERSTANDS, THE PRESIDENT HAS LOST CONFIDENCE IN YOU.
LOST CONFIDENCE IN YOU. THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, A TERRIBLE
THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, A TERRIBLE THING TO HEAR.
THING TO HEAR. AND I SAID, WELL, YOU KNOW, I
AND I SAID, WELL, YOU KNOW, I GUESS I HAVE TO GO THEN.
GUESS I HAVE TO GO THEN. BUT NO -- NO REAL REASON WAS
BUT NO -- NO REAL REASON WAS OFFERED AS TO WHY I HAD TO LEAVE
OFFERED AS TO WHY I HAD TO LEAVE AND WHY IT WAS BEING DONE IN
AND WHY IT WAS BEING DONE IN SUCH A MANNER.
SUCH A MANNER. >> DID YOU HAVE ANY INDICATION
>> DID YOU HAVE ANY INDICATION THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT HAD
THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT HAD LOST CONFIDENCE IN YOU?
LOST CONFIDENCE IN YOU? >> NO.
>> NO. >> AND WERE YOU PROVIDED ANY
>> AND WERE YOU PROVIDED ANY REASON WHY THE PRESIDENT LOST
REASON WHY THE PRESIDENT LOST CONFIDENCE IN YOU?
CONFIDENCE IN YOU? >> NO.
>> NO. >> IN YOUR OPENING STATEMENT
>> IN YOUR OPENING STATEMENT THAT YOU HAD LEFT UKRAINE BY THE
THAT YOU HAD LEFT UKRAINE BY THE TIME OF THE JULY 25th CALL
TIME OF THE JULY 25th CALL BETWEEN PRESIDENT TRUMP AND
BETWEEN PRESIDENT TRUMP AND PRESIDENT ZELENSKY, WHEN WAS THE
PRESIDENT ZELENSKY, WHEN WAS THE FIRST TIME THAT YOU SAW THE CALL
FIRST TIME THAT YOU SAW THE CALL RECORD FOR THIS PHONE CALL?
RECORD FOR THIS PHONE CALL? >> WHEN IT WAS RELEASED PUBLICLY
>> WHEN IT WAS RELEASED PUBLICLY AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER, I
AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER, I BELIEVE.
BELIEVE. >> AND PRIOR TO READING THAT
>> AND PRIOR TO READING THAT CALL RECORD, WERE YOU AWARE THAT
CALL RECORD, WERE YOU AWARE THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP HAD SPECIFICALLY
PRESIDENT TRUMP HAD SPECIFICALLY MADE REFERENCE TO YOU IN THAT
MADE REFERENCE TO YOU IN THAT CALL?
CALL? >> NO.
>> NO. >> WHAT WAS YOUR REACTION TO
>> WHAT WAS YOUR REACTION TO LEARNING THAT?
LEARNING THAT? >> I WAS SHOCKED.
>> I WAS SHOCKED. ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED.
ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED. AND DEVASTATED, FRANKLY.
AND DEVASTATED, FRANKLY. >> WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY
>> WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY DEVASTATED?
DEVASTATED? >> I WAS SHOCKED AND DEVASTATED
>> I WAS SHOCKED AND DEVASTATED THAT I WOULD FEATURE IN A PHONE
THAT I WOULD FEATURE IN A PHONE CALL BETWEEN TWO HEADS OF STATE
CALL BETWEEN TWO HEADS OF STATE IN SUCH A MANNER, WHERE
IN SUCH A MANNER, WHERE PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID I WAS BAD
PRESIDENT TRUMP SAID I WAS BAD NEWS TO ANOTHER WORLD LEADER AND
NEWS TO ANOTHER WORLD LEADER AND THAT I WOULD BE GOING THROUGH
THAT I WOULD BE GOING THROUGH THINGS.
THINGS. SO, I WAS -- IT WAS A TERRIBLE
SO, I WAS -- IT WAS A TERRIBLE MOMENT.
MOMENT. A PERSON WHO SAW ME ACTUALLY
A PERSON WHO SAW ME ACTUALLY READING THE TRANSCRIPT SAID THAT
READING THE TRANSCRIPT SAID THAT THE COLOR DRAINED MY FACE.
THE COLOR DRAINED MY FACE. I THINK I EVEN HAD A PHYSICAL
I THINK I EVEN HAD A PHYSICAL REACTION.
REACTION. >> THE NEXT EXCERPT WHEN THE
>> THE NEXT EXCERPT WHEN THE PRESIDENT REFERENCES YOU WAS A
PRESIDENT REFERENCES YOU WAS A SHOT ONE, BUT HE SAID, WELL,
SHOT ONE, BUT HE SAID, WELL, SHE'S GOING TO GO THROUGH SOME
SHE'S GOING TO GO THROUGH SOME THINGS.
THINGS. WHAT DID YOU THINK WHEN
WHAT DID YOU THINK WHEN PRESIDENT TRUMP TOLD PRESIDENT
PRESIDENT TRUMP TOLD PRESIDENT ZELENSKY AND YOU READ THAT YOU
ZELENSKY AND YOU READ THAT YOU WERE GOING TO GO THROUGH SOME
WERE GOING TO GO THROUGH SOME THINGS?
THINGS? >> I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT TO THINK,
>> I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT TO THINK, BUT I WAS VERY CONCERNED.
BUT I WAS VERY CONCERNED. >> WHAT WERE YOU CONCERNED
>> WHAT WERE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT?
ABOUT? >> SHE'S GOING TO GO THROUGH
>> SHE'S GOING TO GO THROUGH SOME THINGS.
SOME THINGS. IT DIDN'T SOUND GOOD.
IT DIDN'T SOUND GOOD. IT SOUNDED LIKE A THREAT.
IT SOUNDED LIKE A THREAT. >> AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH, AS WE
>> AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH, AS WE SIT HERE TESTIFYING, THE
SIT HERE TESTIFYING, THE PRESIDENT IS ATTACKING YOU ON
PRESIDENT IS ATTACKING YOU ON TWITTER.
TWITTER. AND I'D LIKE TO GIVE YOU A
AND I'D LIKE TO GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO RESPOND.
CHANCE TO RESPOND. I'LL READ PART OF HIS TWEETS.
I'LL READ PART OF HIS TWEETS. EVERYWHERE MARIE YOVANOVITCH
EVERYWHERE MARIE YOVANOVITCH WENT TURNED BAD.
WENT TURNED BAD. SHE STARTED OUT IN SOMALIA.
SHE STARTED OUT IN SOMALIA. HOW DID THAT GO?
HOW DID THAT GO? HE GOES ON TO SAY, LATER IN THE
HE GOES ON TO SAY, LATER IN THE TWEET IS THE U.S. PRESIDENT HAS
TWEET IS THE U.S. PRESIDENT HAS THE ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO APPOINT
THE ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO APPOINT AMBASSADORS.
AMBASSADORS. FIRST OF ALL, AMBASSADOR
FIRST OF ALL, AMBASSADOR YOVANOVITCH, THE SENATE HAS A
YOVANOVITCH, THE SENATE HAS A CHANCE TO CONFIRM OR DENY AN
CHANCE TO CONFIRM OR DENY AN AMBASSADOR, DO TLE NOT?
AMBASSADOR, DO TLE NOT? >> YES, ADVISE AND CONSENT.
>> YES, ADVISE AND CONSENT. >> WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO
>> WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO RESPOND TO THE PRESIDENT'S
RESPOND TO THE PRESIDENT'S ATTACK THAT EVERYWHERE YOU WENT
ATTACK THAT EVERYWHERE YOU WENT TURNED BAD?
TURNED BAD? >> WELL, I -- I MEAN, I -- I
>> WELL, I -- I MEAN, I -- I DON'T THINK I HAVE SUCH POWERS,
DON'T THINK I HAVE SUCH POWERS, NOT IN MOGADISHU, SOMALIA AND IN
NOT IN MOGADISHU, SOMALIA AND IN OTHER PLACES.
OTHER PLACES. I ACTUALLY THINK WHERE I'VE
I ACTUALLY THINK WHERE I'VE SERVED OVER THE YEARS, I AND
SERVED OVER THE YEARS, I AND OTHERS HAVE DEMONSTRABLY MADE
OTHERS HAVE DEMONSTRABLY MADE THINGS BETTER, YOU KNOW, FOR THE
THINGS BETTER, YOU KNOW, FOR THE U.S. AS WELL AS FOR THE
U.S. AS WELL AS FOR THE COUNTRIES THAT I'VE SERVED IN.
COUNTRIES THAT I'VE SERVED IN. UKRAINE, FOR EXAMPLE, WHERE
UKRAINE, FOR EXAMPLE, WHERE THERE ARE HUGE CHALLENGES,
THERE ARE HUGE CHALLENGES, INCLUDING ON THE ISSUE WE'RE
INCLUDING ON THE ISSUE WE'RE DISCUSSING TODAY OF CORRUPTION.
DISCUSSING TODAY OF CORRUPTION. HUGE CHALLENGES.
HUGE CHALLENGES. BUT THEY'VE MADE A LOT OF
BUT THEY'VE MADE A LOT OF PROGRESS SINCE 2014, INCLUDING
PROGRESS SINCE 2014, INCLUDING IN THE YEARS THAT I WAS THERE.
IN THE YEARS THAT I WAS THERE. AND I THINK, IN PART, I MEAN,
AND I THINK, IN PART, I MEAN, UKRAINIAN PEOPLE GET THE MOST --
UKRAINIAN PEOPLE GET THE MOST -- THE MOST CREDIT FOR THAT.
THE MOST CREDIT FOR THAT. BUT A PART OF THAT CREDIT GOES
BUT A PART OF THAT CREDIT GOES TO THE WORK OF THE UNITED STATES
>> I WANT TO LET YOU KNOW,
>> I WANT TO LET YOU KNOW, AMBASSADOR, THAT SOME OF US HERE
AMBASSADOR, THAT SOME OF US HERE TAKE WITNESS INTIMIDATION VERY,
TAKE WITNESS INTIMIDATION VERY, VERY SERIOUSLY.
VERY SERIOUSLY. >> DO YOU THINK PART OF MAKING
>> DO YOU THINK PART OF MAKING THE UKRAINIAN INTELLIGENCE TO DO
THE UKRAINIAN INTELLIGENCE TO DO THINGS COUNTER TO U.S.
THINGS COUNTER TO U.S. INTERESTS?
INTERESTS? I THINK THAT'S CERTAINLY WHAT
I THINK THAT'S CERTAINLY WHAT THE UKRAINIAN ESTABLISHMENT
THE UKRAINIAN ESTABLISHMENT HOPED.
HOPED. I THINK THAT IN IN ADDITION
I THINK THAT IN IN ADDITION THERE WERE AMERICANS, THESE TWO
THERE WERE AMERICANS, THESE TWO INDIVIDUALS, WHO WERE WORKING
INDIVIDUALS, WHO WERE WORKING WITH MAYOR GIULIANI, MR. PARNAS
WITH MAYOR GIULIANI, MR. PARNAS AND MR. FRUMAN RECENTLY INDICTED
AND MR. FRUMAN RECENTLY INDICTED BY THE FEDERAL DISTRICT OF NEW
BY THE FEDERAL DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WHO INDICATED THAT THEY
YORK WHO INDICATED THAT THEY WANTED TO CHANGE OUT THE
WANTED TO CHANGE OUT THE AMBASSADOR AND I THINK THEY MUST
AMBASSADOR AND I THINK THEY MUST HAVE HAD SOME REASON FOR THAT.
HAVE HAD SOME REASON FOR THAT. >> YOU CERTAINLY CAN UNDERSTAND
>> YOU CERTAINLY CAN UNDERSTAND HAS THE PRESIDENT AWARE OF THE
HAS THE PRESIDENT AWARE OF THE MINISTER IN A STATEMENT AWARE OF
MINISTER IN A STATEMENT AWARE OF WHAT MR. POROSHENKO WAS UP TO
WHAT MR. POROSHENKO WAS UP TO AND MR. PARNAS AND REASONABLE
AND MR. PARNAS AND REASONABLE BASIS TO WONDER WHETHER THERE
BASIS TO WONDER WHETHER THERE ARE INFLUENTIAL ELEMENTS TO
ARE INFLUENTIAL ELEMENTS TO UKRAINIAN ESTABLISHMENT THAT
UKRAINIAN ESTABLISHMENT THAT WERE OUT TO GET THE PRESIDENT?
WERE OUT TO GET THE PRESIDENT? >> I -- YOU KNOW, AGAIN, I MEAN,
>> I -- YOU KNOW, AGAIN, I MEAN, I CAN'T SPEAK FOR WHAT PRESIDENT
I CAN'T SPEAK FOR WHAT PRESIDENT TRUMP THOUGHT OR WHAT OTHERS
TRUMP THOUGHT OR WHAT OTHERS THOUGHT.
THOUGHT. I WOULD JUST SAY THAT THOSE
I WOULD JUST SAY THAT THOSE ELEMENTS THAT YOU'VE RECITED
ELEMENTS THAT YOU'VE RECITED DON'T SEEM TO BE THE UKRAINIAN
DON'T SEEM TO BE THE UKRAINIAN KIND OF A PLAN OR A PLOT FOR THE
KIND OF A PLAN OR A PLOT FOR THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT TO WORK
UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT TO WORK AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP OR
AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP OR ANYONE ELSE.
ANYONE ELSE. I MEAN, THEY'RE ISOLATED
I MEAN, THEY'RE ISOLATED INCIDENTS.
INCIDENTS. WE ALL KNOW I'M COMING TO FIND
WE ALL KNOW I'M COMING TO FIND OUT MYSELF THAT PUBLIC LIFE CAN
OUT MYSELF THAT PUBLIC LIFE CAN BE -- PEOPLE ARE CRITICAL, AND
BE -- PEOPLE ARE CRITICAL, AND THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT SOMEONE
THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT SOMEONE IS, OR A GOVERNMENT IS
IS, OR A GOVERNMENT IS UNDERMINING EITHER A CAMPAIGN OR
UNDERMINING EITHER A CAMPAIGN OR INTERFERING IN ELECTIONS AND I
INTERFERING IN ELECTIONS AND I WOULD JUST REMIND AGAIN THAT OUR
WOULD JUST REMIND AGAIN THAT OUR OWN U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY
OWN U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY HAS CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED THAT
HAS CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED THAT THE, THOSE WHO INTERFERED IN THE
THE, THOSE WHO INTERFERED IN THE ELECTION WERE IN RUSSIA.
コツ:単語をクリックしてすぐ意味を調べられます!

読み込み中…

Highlights From Yovanovitch's Impeachment Testimony | NBC News NOW

30 タグ追加 保存
Edward Cheung 2019 年 11 月 18 日 に公開
お勧め動画
  1. 1. クリック一つで単語を検索

    右側のスプリクトの単語をクリックするだけで即座に意味が検索できます。

  2. 2. リピート機能

    クリックするだけで同じフレーズを何回もリピート可能!

  3. 3. ショートカット

    キーボードショートカットを使うことによって勉強の効率を上げることが出来ます。

  4. 4. 字幕の表示/非表示

    日・英のボタンをクリックすることで自由に字幕のオンオフを切り替えられます。

  5. 5. 動画をブログ等でシェア

    コードを貼り付けてVoiceTubeの動画再生プレーヤーをブログ等でシェアすることが出来ます!

  6. 6. 全画面再生

    左側の矢印をクリックすることで全画面で再生できるようになります。

  1. クイズ付き動画

    リスニングクイズに挑戦!

  1. クリックしてメモを表示

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔