WELCOME BACK.

I AM BACK WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP'S

PERSONAL ATTORNEY, FORMER NEW

YORK CITY MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI.

THERE ARE TESTIMONIES THAT ARE

GOING TO BE COMING.

WE KNOW THAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE

LOOKING FOR BILL BARR TO RECUSE

HIMSELF.

THEY ARE LOOKING TO SUBPOENA,

THEY HAVE SUBPOENAED SECRETARY

OF STATE MIKE POMPEO.

HAVE YOU GOTTEN SUBPOENAED?

ARE YOU EXPECTING TO TESTIFY?

WHAT'S NEXT?

>> I HAVE NOT BEEN SUBPOENAED.

WHEN I AM OR IF THEY CALL ME AND

ASK ME IF I'LL TESTIFY

VOLUNTARILY, I'LL TALK ABOUT

THAT WITH MY CLIENTMENT THEY

TREAT PRESIDENT TRUMP AS IF HE

HAS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

I'M HIS ATTORNEY.

THERE'S SOMETHING CALLED

ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE THAT

HAS TO BE CONSIDERED EVEN IF

THEY DON'T THINK HE SHOULD HAVE

ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE.

WOULD I BE WILLING TO EXPLAIN

THIS OPENLY, DO DID ANYBODY DO

ANYTHING WRONG HERE?

ABSOLUTELY NOT.

THE ONLY THING DONE WRONG HERE

IS THE COVER-UP OF THESE CHARGES

FOR THREE YEARS THAT ARE VERY,

VERY SERIOUS.

THESE ARE VERY SERIOUS CHARGES,

AND THEY'RE BACKED UP BY SWORN

AFFIDAVITS, AND THEY'RE ONLINE.

AND THE WASHINGTON PRESS CORPS

TRYING TO PROTECT A BIDEN LIKE

THEY PROTECTED CLINTON THE, AND

BEYOND THAT THE PATTERN A

PATTERN OF PAY FOR PLAY.

IT INCLUDES SOMETHING VERY

SIMILAR TO WHAT HAPPENED AT THE

CLINTON FOUNDATION WHICH GOES TO

THE VERY CORE OF WHAT DID OBAMA

KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT.

IN DECEMBER OF 2015, "THE NEW

YORK TIMES"ES WROTE AN ARTICLE,

SCATHING CRITICISM OF BIDEN FOR

PUTTING HIS SON IN THIS

CONFLICTED POSITION AND

COMPROMISING HIS ABILITY TO DEAL

WITH CORRUPTION.

WHICH, BY THE WAY, SHOULD BE A

CONCERN -- WAIT, WAIT, SHOULD BE

A CONCERN OF A FUTURE PRESIDENT.

QUESTION IS WHEN BIDEN AND OBAMA

SAW THAT ARTICLE ABOUT HOW THE

SON WAS PULLING DOWN MONEY FOR

THE MOST CROOKED OLIGARCH IN

RUSSIA, DID OBAMA CALL BIDEN IN

AND SAY, JOE, HOW COULD YOU BE

DOING THIS?

MARIA: YEAH, I UNDERSTAND THAT.

BUT THE REALITY IS THAT THE

DEMOCRATS HAVE THE MATTER IN THE

HOUSE.

THAT MEANS THEY HAVE SUBPOENA

POWER, THAT MEANS THEY ARE

RUNNING THE SHOW.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT

THEM?

THE FACT THAT THERE WAS

WRONGDOING DONE IN EARLY 2016,

THEY DON'T -- THEY'RE REFUSING

TO LOOK AT.

>> IT WOULD BE NICE IF I SAY TO

MY FELLOW REPUBLICAN, IT WOULD

BE NICE INSTEAD OF ATTACKING ME,

THE MESSENGER, WITHOUT KNOWING

WHAT REALLY IS INVOLVED, IF

YOU'D GIVE ME THE BENEFIT OF THE

DOUBT BEFORE YOU ATTACK ME, AND

YOU TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT I HAVE.

MARIA: RIGHT.

>> HOW ABOUT, HOW ABOUT DON'T --

WE HAVE HEARINGS?

I MEAN, SUPPOSE IT WAS ALLEGED

THAT DONALD TRUMP JR. GOT $8

MILLION FROM A CROOKED OLIGARCH

IN UKRAINE?

HOW LONG WOULD IT TAKE FOR THE

DEMOCRATS TO INVESTIGATE US?

AND HOW LONG WOULD IT TAKE FOR

"THE WASHINGTON POST" AND THE

NEW YORK TIMES TO HAVE GLARING

HEADLINES?

UNTIL WE CURE THAT, WE'RE GOING

TO BE A DIVIDED COUNTRY.

MARIA: YEAH.

>> AND UNTIL OUR REPUBLICAN

FRIENDS REALIZE THAT WE'RE

REALLY NOT IN BAD FAITH, THAT

THIS IS REALLY SERIOUS AND THAT

I AM CONCERNED AS I HAVE BEEN

FROM THE TIME I WAS AN ASSISTANT

U.S. ATTORNEY, I FIND THE SALE

OF PUBLIC OFFICE TO BE

DISGUSTING.

AND THEY WEREN'T HIRING HUNTER

BIDEN.

THERE WERE A HUNDRED REASONS WHY

THEY WEREN'T HIRING HIM

INCLUDING THE FACT THAT HE'S A

TROUBLED YOUNG MAN WHO SHOULDN'T

HAVE BEEN PUT IN THAT POSITION.

THEY WERE BUYING JOE BIDEN, AND

IF HE DIDN'T SEE THAT, THEN HE'S

BLIND.

AND IF OBAMA DIDN'T DEAL WITH

IT, THEN HE'S -- IT'S NOT THE

KIND OF PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP

IS WHO TAKES ARTICLE II, SECTION

MARIA: I'M BACK WITH RUDY

GIULIANI.

DID PRESIDENT TRUMP HOLD BACK

AID TO UKRAINE BECAUSE HE WANTED

THEM TO INVESTIGATE JOE BIDEN

AND HIS SON?

>> ISN'T THE BEST ANSWER TO THAT

THE TELEPHONE CONVERSATION?

ALTHOUGH THE DEMOCRATS SAID THAT

BEFORE IT CAME OUT, AND SCHIFF

PRETENDED THAT IT DID, LOOK AT

THE TRANSCRIPT.

IS THERE ANY MENTION OF MILITARY

AID?

NO.

DID HE HOLD BACK THE AID?

NO.

MARIA: DID YOU WORK WITH

OTHER --

>> I HAVE NEVER, IN MY

DISCUSSION --

MARIA: DID YOU WORK WITH OTHER

LAWYERS TO TRY TO GET DIRT ON

JOE BIDEN?

>> NO.

I DIDN'T WORK WITH ANYBODY TO

TRY TO GET DIRT ON JOE BIDEN.

THE DIRT ON JOE BIDEN WAS HANDED

TO ME BY THE UKRAINIANS, AMAZED

THAT THE FBI HADN'T ASKED FOR

THIS A YEAR EARLIER, COMPLETELY

SHOCKED AND WORRIED THAT OUR

SYSTEM OF JUSTICE WAS FLAWED.

BECAUSE JOE BIDEN ANNOUNCED IT

PUBLICLY.

AND IF YOU'RE A LAWYER AT ALL,

WHAT JOE BIDEN ANNOUNCED WAS HE

OFFERED SOMETHING OF VALUE, $1.2

BILLION LOAN GUARANTEE, IN ORDER

TO GET THE PROSECUTOR TO TAKE

OFFICIAL ACTION -- THAT'S THE

CRIME OF BRIBERY -- AND THE

MOTIVE IS IF YOU AT LEAST

INTERVIEW THE GUY TO COFFER UP

THE -- COVER UP THE CASE ON HIS

SON.

THERE WERE ALSO, BY THE WAY, I I

BELIEVE THREE OTHER AFFIDAVITS

OF DIFFERENT PROSECUTORS, SOME

OF THEM NOT FRIENDLY TO THIS

PROSECUTOR --

MARIA: RIGHT.

>> SAYING THE SAME THING.

THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE

INVESTIGATIONS FOR.

MARIA: BUT, RUDY, THE BOTTOM

LINE IS YOU'RE NOT GETTING THAT

ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE, AND THEY

ARE IN CHARGE.

>> I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE

DEMOCRATS.

MARIA: WHAT DO YOU NEED TO DO TO

GET --

>> I CARE ABOUT THE AMERICAN

PEOPLE.

MARIA: BUT THEY KNOW WHAT'S

GOING ON --

>> WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO?

MARIA: WHERE ARE THE

INDICTMENTS?

WHERE ARE THE PROSECUTIONS FOR

THE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY DID

WRONGDOING IN THE 2016

ELECTIONS?

>> THAT'S A VERY GOOD --

MARIA: HAVE YOU SPOKEN TO BILL

BARR ABOUT THIS?

WHERE IS IT?

>> THAT IS A VERY GOOD QUESTION,

AND THAT'S THE QUESTION WE

SHOULD KEEP ASKING.

AND THE REALITY IS BEFORE THEY

START CRITICIZING ME, THE

QUESTION SHOULD BE WHAT HAVE

THEY DONE ABOUT IT?

WHERE'S THE REPUBLICAN SENATE

INVESTIGATING EXTREMELY SERIOUS

CHARGES ABOUT THE FORMER VICE

PRESIDENT?

WHO I KNOW IS A MEMBER OF THE

CLUB, BUT MEMBERS OF THE CLUB

DON'T GET TO PUT SONS IN

POSITIONS -- PUT THEIR SONS IN

POSITIONS WHERE THEY MAKE

MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND

MILLIONS WHERE YOU HAVE TO BE AN

IDIOT NOT TO KNOW THE SON WAS

TRADING ON THE FATHER'S PUBLIC

OFFICE.

MARIA: YEAH.

>> THAT IS DISGUSTING.

MARIA: I'VE BEEN ASKING THE

QUESTION ABOUT CHINA FOR A LONG

TIME NOW, THE FACT THAT HUNTER

BIDEN GOT $1.5 BILLION FROM THE

BANK OF CHINA AFTER HE TOOK THAT

RIDE ON AIR FORCE TWO --

>> NOW, CHINA I HAVE TO SAY I

DIDN'T INVESTIGATE.

I DON'T HAVE THE AFFIDAVITS.

HERE I HAVE ALL THE PROOF.

MARIA: YEP.

>> WHAT I UNDERSTAND ABOUT CHINA

IS HE WAS ACTUALLY IN A

PARTNERSHIP WITH THE BANK OF

CHINA AND WITH WHITE KEY

BULGER'S NEPHEW.

IF THE REPUBLICANS DON'T HAVE

ENOUGH COURAGE TO INVESTIGATE

THAT, WE'RE NOT REALLY EVEN

REPRESENTING THE AMERICAN

PEOPLE.

THE OVERRIDING REASON FOR DOING

THIS IS IF A VICE PRESIDENT DID

THIS AND COMPROMISED US IN CHINA

AND IN UKRAINE --

MARIA: YEP.

>> YOU KNOW, THE CHINESE

GOVERNMENT KNOWS WHY THEY GAVE

THE MONEY.

THEY WEREN'T HIRING HUNTER

BIDEN'S EXPERTISE.

THEY WERE BUYING JOE BIDEN.

FINISH AND, BY THE WAY, FOR THE

PRICE OF THAT, THEY ALSO GOT

JOHN KERRY'S STEPSON.

MARIA: YEAH, NO, I KNOW CHINA'S

WAYS, AND WE REPORTED THAT OVER

AND OVER.

I UNDERSTAND.

>> BECAUSE HE'S ONE OF OUR GUYS,

HE'S PART OF THE CLUB.

MARIA: YOU MADE YOUR POINTS.

RUDY GIULIANI, THANK YOU.

>> THERE'S A PATTERN HERE OF PAY

FOR PLAY, AND I'M NOT GOING TO

BE SILENT ABOUT IT BECAUSE THEY

INTIMIDATE ME.

THEY CAN INTIMIDATE ME ALL THEY

WANT, AND THE REALITY IS --

MARIA: YEAH.

>> -- THIS IS BECAUSE I

REPRESENT THE PRESIDENT OF THE

UNITED STATES, I WANT TO SHOW

THAT HE'S INNOCENT.