HERE WITH MORE IS PRESIDENT

TRUMP'S ATTORNEY.

HE'S DONE WORK FOR ME ALSO IN

THE PAST.

BUT THEY GOT A BIGGER CLIENT

NOW.

GOOD FOR HIM.

ALSO, THE -- THE CHIEF COUNSEL,

AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND

JUSTICE, JAY SECULA.

>> THANK, SEAN.

>> Sean: THE PRESIDENT IS RIGHT,

THEY, THE LEFT IN THIS COUNTRY

AND THE MEDIA HAVE DECLARED WAR

ON THIS PRESIDENT.

BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, IT'S

REALLY AGAINST THE SMELLY

WALMART PEOPLE LIKE ME ANDER

REDEEMABLE DEPLORABLES AND

PEOPLE WHO CLING TO GOD, GUNS,

BIBLES, AND RELIGION BECAUSE

THEY DON'T LIKE WHO WE ELECTED

AND THEY WANT TO UNDO AN

ELECTION IN ALL OF THIS.

>> WELL, LOOK, I MEAN, HERE'S

WHAT HAPPENED.

THE RUSSIA HOAX ENDED UP BEING

NOTHING WHEN BOB MUELLER

ATTEMPTED THAT TESTIMONY,

WHATEVER THAT WAS, THAT GOT HIM

ZERO.

THE REPORT WAS NOTHING.

THE TESTIMONY WAS NOTHING.

THEN THEY COME OUT WITH THE

UKRAINE.

NOW, I WANT TO READ SOMETHING IN

THIS SO-CALLED WHISTLEBLOWER, I

CALL SPY.

I DON'T KNOW THE PERSON

OBVIOUSLY, BY THE WAY.

BUT WHEN YOU READ WHAT THE

INDIVIDUAL WROTE, IT SOUNDS LIKE

SPYING.

BUT THE ONE THING THAT IS

WRITTEN, I WAS NOT A DIRECT

WITNESS TO MOST OF THE EVENTS

DESCRIBED.

THIS IS HEARSAY IN OUR VIEW.

BY THE WAY, IF THE WITNESS

ACTUALLY SAID THAT IN A COURT OF

LAW IN THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF

GEORGIA, SAY, IN MAICON, THEY

WOULDN'T BE ADMITTED TO COURT.

IT'S CALLED HEARSAY.

NOW, HERE'S AN INTERESTING FACT.

IT'S JUST COMING TO LIGHT RIGHT

NOW.

THIS -- THIS PERSON SAYS THEY

HAVE NO FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE OF

THIS.

THEY HEARD THIS FROM OTHER

PEOPLE.

THE FORM THAT SO-CALLED

WHISTLEBLOWERS FILL OUT USED TO

SAY THIS -- IN ORDER TO FIND AN

URGENT CONCERN CREDIBLE, THE

INSPECTOR GENERAL MUST BE IN

POSSESSION OF RELIABLE FIRSTHAND

INFORMATION.

IN OTHER WORDS, THE INSPECTOR

GENERAL AND THE INDIVIDUAL

MAKING THE COMPLAINT.

SO THAT WOULD BE THE FIRSTHAND

INFORMATION HAS TO HAVE

FIRSTHAND INFORMATION.

THAT WAS ON THE FORM LITERALLY

UNTIL APPARENTLY VERY RECENTLY.

NOW I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT DATE

OF THE CHANGE, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE

IT COULD HAVE BEEN CHANGED AS

LATE AS JULY OR AUGUST.

I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT DATE YET.

BUT I WILL TELL YOU, MONTHS AGO,

NO FIRSTHAND INFORMATION, NO

REPORT.

SO WHAT IS THIS?

THIS IS HEARSAY.

SECONDLY, WHAT ABOUT THE

HEARSAY?

WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD

BE THINKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW IS

WE'VE GOT INDIVIDUALS INSIDE OF

SOME AGENCY THAT ARE LISTENING

TO THE PRESIDENT'S

CONVERSATIONS.

THEY DON'T LIKE THEM.

SO THEY WANT THEM OUT.

SO, THE WHITE HOUSE BEING FULLY

TRANSPARENT RELEASED THESE

TRANSCRIPTS.

NOW, LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING,

THE TRANSPARENCY IS GREAT, BUT

IF YOU THINK THIS IS GOOD FOR

AMERICA THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH

THIS?

GUESS AGAIN.

FOREIGN LEADERS WILL BE

HESITANT.

IT'S MY CONCERN -- IT'S ALWAYS

MY CONCERN.

FOREIGN LEADERS WILL BE HESITANT

IN ENGAGING IN PHONE

CONVERSATIONS WITH THIS KIND OF

NONSENSE GOING ON.

LET ME TAKE IT A STEP FURTHER.

NANCY PELOSI ANNOUNCES THAT

SHEP'S GOING TO START THIS

FORMAL IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY,

WHICH, BY THE WAY, SUBSTANTIVELY

NO DIFFERENT THAN WHAT THEY'VE

BEEN DOING FOR THE LAST YEAR OR

THREE.

THEY DO NOT REFER THIS TO THE

FLOOR OF THE HOUSE FOR A VOTE.

>> Sean: WHY NOT?

>> FOR ARTICLES -- TO BE

REFERRED TO THE JUDICIARY

COMMITTEE FOR ARTICLES OF

IMPEACHMENT.

SHE DID THAT BEFORE SHE EVEN

READ THIS REPORT.

SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE HERE?

THIS IS NOT A LEGAL MATTER.

I WANT PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND

THIS.

I KNOW MY FRIEND AND COLLEAGUE,

RUDY GIULIANI IS GOING TO BE ON.

THIS IS NOT A LEGAL MATTER.

THIS IS PURE POLITICS.

AND WHATEVER THE POLITICAL

CALCULATION IS, WHICH I THINK IS

A VERY DESPERATE MOVE, IF THEY

WERE TO MARCH DOWN THIS PATH, I

THINK IT'S POLITICAL SUICIDE FOR

THOSE THAT WOULD DO THAT.

BECAUSE WHAT A SIGN OF

DESPERATION.

DOES ANYBODY REALLY BELIEVE THAT

14 SECONDS UTTERS IN THAT

STATEMENT, IN THE CONVERSATION,

IF YOU PUT ALL OF THE REFERENCES

TO JOE BIDEN AND THE HUNTER

BIDEN, WHICH IS TWO.

AND THE ENTIRE SITUATION

TOGETHER AND YOU PUT IN MY

COLLEAGUE'S REFERENCE TO RUDY

GIULIANI RAISED BY THE WAY BY

THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE, HE

FIRST RAISED IT.

I THINK IT MAY EQUAL 20 SECONDS,

30 SECONDS.

AND A CONVERSATION THAT WAS A --

>> Sean: 33 MINUTES.

>> I'M SURE -- THE TRANSLATION

IS A THIRD OR LESS THAN THAT.

BUT IT'S PROBABLY, AT LEAST YOU

KNOW, 15, 20 MINUTES.

BUT THAT'S GOING TO BE THE

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT?

GO AHEAD, START THE PROCESS.

VOTE.

BECAUSE THIS IS BORDERING -- NOT

ONLY ON THE ABSURD, BUT I THINK

THERE IS A DERELICTION OF

CONSTITUTIONAL DUTIES IF YOU

IGNORE THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF.

THERE'S NO HIGH CRIME.

NO MISDEMEANOR.

NO VIOLATION OF THE LAW, RULE,

OR REGULATION.

IT'S ALREADY BEEN -- THE JUSTICE

DEPARTMENT, WHEN THEY LOOKED AT

IT, SAID THERE WAS NO VIOLATION