>> Sean:

>> Tean:

>> THIn:

>> THIS:

>> THIS IS HELL.

THIS IS GOING TO DESTROY THE

ABILITY OF GOOD PEOPLE TO COME

FORWARD BECAUSE OF THIS.

TO MY REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUES COME

IF YOU VOTE NO, YOU ARE

LEGITIMIZING THE MOST DESPICABLE

THING I HAVE SEEN IN MY TIME AND

POLITICS.

PERIOD YOU WANT TO SEE IT?

I HOPE YOU NEVER GET IT.

I HOPE YOU ARE ON THE

SUPREME COURT.

THAT IS EXACTLY WHERE YOU SHOULD

BE.

AND I HOPE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

WILL SEE TO THIS CHARADE.

>> Sean:

SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM,

SOUTH CAROLINA, ONE OF THE MOST

POWERFUL MOMENTS OF

SUPREME COURT JUSTICE

BRETT KAVANAUGH CONFIRMATION

HEARING LAST YEAR.

WELL, THE LEFT IS STILL NOT DONE

SMEARING JUSTICE KAVANAUGH, THE

JUDICIARY CHAIRMAN, LISTEN, I'VE

KNOWN YOU A LONG TIME.

THAT WAS YOUR FINEST MOMENT, AND

YOU HAD A LOT OF GOOD MOMENTS

OVER YOUR CAREER.

BUT YOU NOW SEE IT DOESN'T STOP.

AND EVEN DICK DURBIN SAID THIS

IDEA OF IMPEACHING, WHAT IS YOUR

REACTION OF THE TIMES?

IT IS NO DIFFERENT THAN WHAT

HAPPENED THAT DAY WHEN YOU SPOKE

OF.

>> WHEN YOU THINK YOU HAVE HIT

BOTTOM, IT YOU REALLY HAVEN'T

WHEN IT COMES TO DRUM.

IT IS NOT REALLY NEWS

"THE NEW YORK TIMES" DID A

SLOPPY JOB REPORTING ABOUT TROMP

AND KAVANAUGH BECAUSE THEY ARE

SO BIASED, BUT WHAT IS NEWS TO

ME IS TO COUNITED STATES

SENATORS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT

HAVE CALLED FOR KAVANAUGH'S

IMPEACHMENT BASED ON AN

ARTICLE OF "THE NEW YORK TIMES"S

ARTICLE OF "THE NEW YORK TIMES"B

ARTICLE OF "THE NEW YORK TIMES"G

ARTICLE OF "THE NEW YORK TIMES"S

ARTICLE OF "THE NEW YORK TIMES".

AND A MEMBER OF THE HOUSES

INTRODUCED IMPEACHMENT

IMPEACHMENT RESOLUTION OF

JUDGE KAVANAUGH BASED ON

ERRONEOUS, SCORELESS NEW YORK

STORY.

SO HERE IS WHAT I WANT YOU TO

KNOW.

ANY IMPEACHMENT TO

"THE NEW YORK TIMES" STORY IS

DEAD ON ARRIVAL IN THE SENATE.

IN THE IMPEACHMENT OF

SENATOR TRUMP BASED ON THE

MUELLER REPORT IS DEAD ON

ARRIVAL IN THE UNITED STATES

SENATE.

>> Sean: WELL, LET ME ASK YOU

BECAUSE THIS DOVETAILS INTO

THEIR ISSUES.

JOURNALISM IS DEAD.

I EXPECT THIS FROM

"THE NEW YORK TIMES."

THEY HAVE NO CREDIBILITY.

AND THE PAPER IS PRINTED ON THIS

POINT.

AND ACTUALLY THIS NEWS, THEY

NEED DONALD DONALD TRUMP MORE

THAN HE NEEDS THEM WHICH IS

INTERESTING, BUT, I GET A LITTLE

ANTSY WAITING FOR THE

INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT,

SENATOR.

I GET A LITTLE ANTSY WHETHER

THEY WILL CONCLUDE WHAT I KNOW

TO BE TRUE.

AND THAT IS, THOSE FOUR FISA

APPLICATION WARRANTS WERE FULL

OF LIES THAT THEY WERE WARNED

ABOUT IT.

RATIONALIZE THAT HILLARY PAID

FOR IT.

THE BULK OF INFORMATION A FAMOUS

MEMO WAS PUT OUT WITH HER NAME

ON IT.

BUT I'M CONCERNED ABOUT, I WANT

TO HEAR IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS,

THOSE WARRANTS WERE ILLEGALLY

OBTAINED.

DO YOU THINK I'M LIKELY TO HEAR

THAT?

>> YOU KNOW, I REALLY DON'T

KNOW.

HORWITZ DID A GOOD JOB TO THE

INVESTIGATION BUT IS NOT A

PROSECUTOR.

HE DOESN'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO

SUBPOENA AND INTERVIEW WITNESSES

OUTSIDE OF THE DOJ OR THE FBI.

BUT HERE IS WHAT I DO BELIEVE.

I DO BELIEVE THE WARRANT PROCESS

WAS ABUSED.

NOT ONLY DO I HOPE HE WILL TELL

US THAT IT WAS OFF OF THE RAILS,

I HOPE THE FISA COURT WILL TAKE

THE REPORT SERIOUSLY.

I'M LOOKING FOR THE FISA COURT

TO CLEAN THIS MESS UP.

IF THE COURT DOESN'T TAKE

CORRECTIVE ACTION, WHY SHOULD WE

TRUST THE COURT IN THE FUTURE?

I'M LOOKING FOR A DORM WHAT

THESE PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE IF THEY

DID IN FACT TAKE FELLOW INTO

THEIR OWN HANDS.

I'M NOT LOOKING TO PROSECUTE

SOMEONE BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE

THEM I WANT TO MAKE SURE THIS

NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN.

>> Sean: IF YOU ARE WARNED

AHEAD OF TIME THAT THE DOSSIER

IS HILLARY, SHE PAID FOR IT AND

THE GUY THAT OFFERED IT AIDS

TROMP AND YOU ARE ALSO WARNED

IT'S NOT VERIFIED NOT ONCE BUT

AM PROBABLY AT LEAST FOUR AND I

HAVE A SOURCE TELLING ME FIVE OR

SIX TIMES THEY WERE WARNED, THAT

IS PREMEDITATED.

THEN, IF YOU DIDN'T TAKE THE

TIME TO VERIFY, SO NOW WE KNOW

IT'S UNVERIFIABLE.

THE FBI WHEN THEY GOT AROUND TO

VERIFYING IT AFTER THE WARRANTS

WERE ALREADY ISSUED, THEY

DETERMINED IT WAS NOT THE TRUTH.

NONE OF THIS WAS TRUE.

THAT MEANS A PREMEDITATED FRAUD

ON A COURT FOR THE PURPOSE OF

SPYING ON AN INDIVIDUAL AND

DENYING THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS,

CARTER PAGE, BUT THEN IT IS AN

OPEN DOOR TO ALL THINGS TRUMP

CAMPAIGN.

TRANSITION AND PRESIDENCY.

NOW, YOU ARE THE LAWYER.

WHAT I DESCRIBE DOES THAT SOUND

LIKE CRIMES TO YOU?

>> IT SOUNDS HORRIBLE.

IF WE LEGITIMIZE THIS, GOD HELP

US ALL.

IF WE LEGITIMIZE THE FACT, THE

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.

>> Sean: I'M NOT TRYING TO BE

A PAIN IN THE NECK, BUT IF I

COMMIT AND GO TO COURT AND MY

LIFE AND I WAS TOLD AHEAD OF

TIME, WHAT YOU ARE TELLING THE

COURT IS A LIE.

IS THAT A CRIME?

>> YES, THAT IS A CRIME TO GET

PAUL'S INFORMATION TO THE COURT.

I'M NOT A PROSECUTOR, HORWITZ IS

NOT A PROSECUTOR BUT WE WILL

LEAVE THAT UP TO DURHAM.

HERE IS WHAT I WANT YOU TO KNOW

EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD BE

CONCERNED ABOUT THE FACT THAT

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE

FBI KNEW THE SOURCE OF THE

DOCUMENT HAD A BIAS AND THEY DID

NOTHING TO ENSURE THE

DOCUMENT WAS RELIABLE IF NOT

RELIABLE TO THIS DAY.

IF THE COURT DOES NOT CLEAR THIS

UP AND TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION,

THEN WHY DO YOU EXPECT PEOPLE IN

THE FUTURE TO BE DETERRED?

IF SOMEBODY DOESN'T GO TO JAIL,

AND IF THE COURT DOESN'T HOLD

THOSE WHO LIED TO THE COURT

ACCOUNTABLE, THEN WE WILL HAVE

MISSED A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO

RESTORE THE RULE OF LAW.

>> Sean: I WILL TELL YOU, I

THINK A STEP FURTHER, WE MIGHT

SHRED THE CONSTITUTION.

BECAUSE THAT MEANS --

>> THAT WILL BE A A BAD DAY FOR

AMERICA.

>> Sean: LAST LEGAL QUESTION.

IF YOU'RE SIPPING OF MY EMAILS

AND I DECIDE TO DELETE HALF OF

THEM, AND THEN I BRING IN

COMPUTER EXPERTS TO TELL ME HOW

TO CLEAN MY HARD DRIVE, WIPE IT,

BLEACH IT OUT, AND THEN I HAVE

BEEN MADE OF MINE BUST UP MY

PHONES, MY BLACKBERRIES AND

REMOVE THIS AND CARDS, WOULD YOU

THINK I'M COMMITTING OBSTRUCTION

OF JUSTICE OF THE COMMITTEE AND

THEIR INVESTIGATION AND NUMBER ,

WOULD I NOT BE CHARGED IN

THAT CASE BECAUSE I THINK I

WOULD BUT I'M NOT A LAWYER.

SPEAK WITH THE FIRST THING IF

YOU ARE AT HOME, DON'T TRY THIS

BECAUSE IT WILL NOT WORK OUT FOR

YOU.

THE BOTTOM LINE, IF THERE IS NO

CONSEQUENCES TO TAKE A HAMMER TO

A DEVICE BEING ASKED BY CONGRESS

AND BLEACHING OUT INFORMATION

CONGRESS ONCE, THEN WHAT IS THE

DOWN SIDE OF TO CONGRESS AND

OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE WHEN IT

COMES TO CONGRESS.

THIS HAS A BIG DEAL.

I HAVE A LOT OF FAITH IN DURHAM,

HORWITZ AND I HAVE A LOT OF

FAITH IN ME.

>> Sean: YOU GUYS WORK FAST.

I WORK 16-17 HOURS A DAY.

WHERE IS THE STUPID REPORT AT

THIS TIME?

I'M GETTING A LITTLE IMPATIENT