字幕表 動画を再生する 英語字幕をプリント PETER ALEXANDER, SHOULD BE QUITE AN EVENTFUL FEW HOURS DOWN THERE AN EVENTFUL FEW HOURS DOWN THERE IN THE AMWAY CENTER, I BELIEVE IN THE AMWAY CENTER, I BELIEVE THEY CALL IT. THEY CALL IT. AS I MENTIONED, PRESIDENT TRUMP AS I MENTIONED, PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS BLOWN UP OUR PRESIDENTIAL HAS BLOWN UP OUR PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS. POLITICS. AND THERE'S ARGUABLY NO BETTER AND THERE'S ARGUABLY NO BETTER EXAMPLE OF THE NEW REALITY WE'RE EXAMPLE OF THE NEW REALITY WE'RE ALL GRAPPLING WITH THAN MY NEXT ALL GRAPPLING WITH THAN MY NEXT GUEST. GUEST. IN MANY WAYS, ANDREW YANG'S IN MANY WAYS, ANDREW YANG'S CANDIDACY IS PROOF OF HOW CANDIDACY IS PROOF OF HOW VULNERABLE SOME SEE THIS VULNERABLE SOME SEE THIS PRESIDENT'S RE-ELECTION CHANCES PRESIDENT'S RE-ELECTION CHANCES BUT ALSO HOW UNPREDICTABLE OUR BUT ALSO HOW UNPREDICTABLE OUR POLITICS HAVE BECOME. POLITICS HAVE BECOME. HERE WE HAVE A BUSINESSMAN OUT HERE WE HAVE A BUSINESSMAN OUT OF NOWHERE, NO PRIOR POLITICAL OF NOWHERE, NO PRIOR POLITICAL OR MILITARY EXPERIENCE, NOT ONLY OR MILITARY EXPERIENCE, NOT ONLY VYING TO DEFEAT THE PRESIDENT, VYING TO DEFEAT THE PRESIDENT, BUT ALSO GETTING ENOUGH VOTERS BUT ALSO GETTING ENOUGH VOTERS TO TAKE HIM SERIOUSLY THAT HE'S TO TAKE HIM SERIOUSLY THAT HE'S MADE THE DEMOCRATIC DEBATE MADE THE DEMOCRATIC DEBATE STAGE. STAGE. MR. YANG JOINS ME NOW. MR. YANG JOINS ME NOW. ANDREW YANG, WELCOME TO "MEET ANDREW YANG, WELCOME TO "MEET THE PRESS DAILY," SIR. THE PRESS DAILY," SIR. >> THANKS FOR HAVING ME, SIR. >> THANKS FOR HAVING ME, SIR. IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE HERE. IT'S A PLEASURE TO BE HERE. >> LET ME GO WITH THIS IMMEDIATE >> LET ME GO WITH THIS IMMEDIATE PREMISE HERE. PREMISE HERE. WOULD YOU BE HERE IF DONALD WOULD YOU BE HERE IF DONALD TRUMP HADN'T WON THE PRESIDENCY? TRUMP HADN'T WON THE PRESIDENCY? >> CATEGORICALLY NOT. >> CATEGORICALLY NOT. I'M RUNNING TO SOLVE THE I'M RUNNING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS THAT GOT DONALD TRUMP PROBLEMS THAT GOT DONALD TRUMP ELECTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. ELECTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. PRIMARILY, THE FACT THAT WE PRIMARILY, THE FACT THAT WE AUTOMATED AWAY 4 MILLION AUTOMATED AWAY 4 MILLION MANUFACTURING JOBS IN MICHIGAN, MANUFACTURING JOBS IN MICHIGAN, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, WISCONSIN, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, WISCONSIN, MISSOURI, AND IOWA. MISSOURI, AND IOWA. BUT I WOULD NOT BE RUNNING IF BUT I WOULD NOT BE RUNNING IF DONALD TRUMP WERE NOT OUR DONALD TRUMP WERE NOT OUR PRESIDENT TODAY. PRESIDENT TODAY. >> WHAT IS IT YOU THINK THE >> WHAT IS IT YOU THINK THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY MISUNDERSTOOD DEMOCRATIC PARTY MISUNDERSTOOD ABOUT TRUMP'S APPEAL FOUR YEARS ABOUT TRUMP'S APPEAL FOUR YEARS AGO? AGO? >> WELL, IF YOU REMEMBER, DONALD >> WELL, IF YOU REMEMBER, DONALD TRUMP POINTED OUT THE TRUMP POINTED OUT THE DEVASTATION AND SUFFERING IN DEVASTATION AND SUFFERING IN MANY AMERICAN COMMUNITIES. MANY AMERICAN COMMUNITIES. >> HE WASN'T ALONE, THOUGH. >> HE WASN'T ALONE, THOUGH. MANY DEMOCRATS POINTED THIS OUT. MANY DEMOCRATS POINTED THIS OUT. BERNIE SANDERS POINTED THIS OUT. BERNIE SANDERS POINTED THIS OUT. BARACK OBAMA POINTED IT OUT FOUR BARACK OBAMA POINTED IT OUT FOUR YEARS EARLIER. YEARS EARLIER. THAT'S WHY I ONLY -- HE WASN'T THAT'S WHY I ONLY -- HE WASN'T THE ONLY ONE. THE ONLY ONE. HE'S JUST THE MOST RECENT ONE. HE'S JUST THE MOST RECENT ONE. >> WELL, BERNIE SANDERS >> WELL, BERNIE SANDERS DEFINITELY POINTED OUT THE SAME DEFINITELY POINTED OUT THE SAME THING, BUT IF YOU REMEMBER THE THING, BUT IF YOU REMEMBER THE PREVAILING RESPONSE WAS PREVAILING RESPONSE WAS AMERICA'S ALREADY DOING GREAT. AMERICA'S ALREADY DOING GREAT. AND YOU KNOW, LIKE, AMERICANS AND YOU KNOW, LIKE, AMERICANS HEARD THAT AND DID NOT THINK HEARD THAT AND DID NOT THINK THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WAS THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WAS TRULY TRYING TO SOLVE THE TRULY TRYING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEMS ON THE GROUND THAT MANY PROBLEMS ON THE GROUND THAT MANY AMERICANS WERE EXPERIENCING. AMERICANS WERE EXPERIENCING. AND WHAT HAPPENED TO THE AND WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MANUFACTURING WORKERS WILL NOW MANUFACTURING WORKERS WILL NOW HAPPEN TO THE RETAIL WORKERS, HAPPEN TO THE RETAIL WORKERS, THE CALL CENTER WORKERS, THE THE CALL CENTER WORKERS, THE FAST FOOD WORKERS, THE TRUCK FAST FOOD WORKERS, THE TRUCK DRIVERS. DRIVERS. WE'RE IN THE MIDST OF THE WE'RE IN THE MIDST OF THE GREATEST ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION GREATEST ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION IN THE HISTORY OF OUR UNCOUNTRY IN THE HISTORY OF OUR UNCOUNTRY AND DEMOCRATS SHOULD BE LASER AND DEMOCRATS SHOULD BE LASER FOCUSED ON ADDRESSING THAT FOCUSED ON ADDRESSING THAT REALITY THAN FOCUSING ON THE REALITY THAN FOCUSING ON THE SYMPTOM, WHICH IS DONALD TRUMP. SYMPTOM, WHICH IS DONALD TRUMP. >> IN SOME WAYS, YOUR SIGNATURE >> IN SOME WAYS, YOUR SIGNATURE PROPOSAL DOESN'T NECESSARILY PROPOSAL DOESN'T NECESSARILY SOLVE THE PROBLEM. SOLVE THE PROBLEM. IT FEELS LIKE A BAND-AID. IT FEELS LIKE A BAND-AID. AND I SAY, YOUR SIGNATURE AND I SAY, YOUR SIGNATURE PROPOSAL, THIS UNIVERSAL INCOME, PROPOSAL, THIS UNIVERSAL INCOME, BECAUSE YOU'RE TRYING TO FILL BECAUSE YOU'RE TRYING TO FILL THE GAP AS WE FIGURE OUT WHAT THE GAP AS WE FIGURE OUT WHAT THE JOBS OF THE 21st CENTURY THE JOBS OF THE 21st CENTURY LOOK LIKE. LOOK LIKE. AM I BEING TOO CYNICAL ABOUT IT? AM I BEING TOO CYNICAL ABOUT IT? >> IF YOU THINK WHAT HAPPENED TO >> IF YOU THINK WHAT HAPPENED TO COMMUNITIES AROUND THE COUNTRY COMMUNITIES AROUND THE COUNTRY IF EVERY AMERICAN ADULT GOT IF EVERY AMERICAN ADULT GOT $1,000 A MONTH, IT WOULD CREATE $1,000 A MONTH, IT WOULD CREATE 2 MILLION JOBS IN OUR 2 MILLION JOBS IN OUR COMMUNITIES, HELP RECOGNIZE THE COMMUNITIES, HELP RECOGNIZE THE KIND OF WORK THAT MY WIFE DOES KIND OF WORK THAT MY WIFE DOES EVERY DAY AT HOME WITH OUR TWO EVERY DAY AT HOME WITH OUR TWO BOYS, ONE OF WHOM IS AUTISTIC. BOYS, ONE OF WHOM IS AUTISTIC. IT'S NOT A BAND-AID. IT'S NOT A BAND-AID. IT SUPERCHARGES OUR ECONOMY AND IT SUPERCHARGES OUR ECONOMY AND CREATES JOBS IN THE DIRECTION WE CREATES JOBS IN THE DIRECTION WE NEED TO GO, WHICH INCLUDES THE NEED TO GO, WHICH INCLUDES THE CARING COMMUNITY, ARTS, AND MAIN CARING COMMUNITY, ARTS, AND MAIN STREET JOBS BECAUSE OF AN STREET JOBS BECAUSE OF AN INCREASE IN CONSUMER BUYING INCREASE IN CONSUMER BUYING POWER. POWER. >> SO YOU THINK ONE OF THE >> SO YOU THINK ONE OF THE POSITIVE ASPECTS ABOUT YOUR PLAN POSITIVE ASPECTS ABOUT YOUR PLAN IS IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO PURSUE IS IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO PURSUE AN ART AND REALLY COULDN'T AN ART AND REALLY COULDN'T AFFORD TO MAKE A LIVING DOING AFFORD TO MAKE A LIVING DOING IT, YOU'RE GIVING THEM AN IT, YOU'RE GIVING THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO IT. OPPORTUNITY TO DO IT. I GET THAT, BUT HOW DOES THAT I GET THAT, BUT HOW DOES THAT GROW OUR ECONOMY? GROW OUR ECONOMY? >> WELL, OUR ECONOMY RIGHT NOW >> WELL, OUR ECONOMY RIGHT NOW IS UP TO A RECORD $20 TRILLION, IS UP TO A RECORD $20 TRILLION, UP $5 TRILLION IN THE LAST 12 UP $5 TRILLION IN THE LAST 12 YEARS ALONE. YEARS ALONE. THE PROBLEM IS THAT WE HAVE THE PROBLEM IS THAT WE HAVE THESE WINNER TAKE ALL DYNAMICS THESE WINNER TAKE ALL DYNAMICS THAT THE GAINS ARE CONCENTRATED THAT THE GAINS ARE CONCENTRATED IN JUST A HANDFUL OF INDUSTRIES IN JUST A HANDFUL OF INDUSTRIES AND COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS. AND COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS. AND SO IF YOU SPREAD THAT BOUNTY AND SO IF YOU SPREAD THAT BOUNTY MORE BROADLY THROUGHOUT THE MORE BROADLY THROUGHOUT THE AMERICAN ECONOMY, IT DOES CREATE AMERICAN ECONOMY, IT DOES CREATE OPPORTUNITIES INCLUDING IN THE OPPORTUNITIES INCLUDING IN THE ARTS, BUT ALSO ENTREPRENEURSHIP. ARTS, BUT ALSO ENTREPRENEURSHIP. AND I'M A SERIAL ENTREPRENEUR. AND I'M A SERIAL ENTREPRENEUR. WE NEED TO HAVE MORE AMERICANS WE NEED TO HAVE MORE AMERICANS BEING PUT INTO POSITION TO DO BEING PUT INTO POSITION TO DO THE KIND OF WORK THEY ACTUALLY THE KIND OF WORK THEY ACTUALLY WANT TO DO. WANT TO DO. >> LET'S TALK ABOUT THE BORDER. >> LET'S TALK ABOUT THE BORDER. THERE IS A LOT OF ANGST AND THERE IS A LOT OF ANGST AND ANXIETY OVER THE BORDER. ANXIETY OVER THE BORDER. THE PRESIDENT BELIEVES THE ISSUE THE PRESIDENT BELIEVES THE ISSUE IS OUR ASYLUM LAWS. IS OUR ASYLUM LAWS. DEMOCRATS BELIEVE THAT SOME OF DEMOCRATS BELIEVE THAT SOME OF THIS HAS TO DO WITH JUST, YOU THIS HAS TO DO WITH JUST, YOU CAN'T PULL MONEY AWAY FROM CAN'T PULL MONEY AWAY FROM CENTRAL AMERICA. CENTRAL AMERICA. WE'VE GOT TO HAVE A DIFFERENCE WE'VE GOT TO HAVE A DIFFERENCE TOLERANCE POLICY HERE. TOLERANCE POLICY HERE. WE HAVE AN INCREASE IN MIGRATION WE HAVE AN INCREASE IN MIGRATION OVER THE BORDER. OVER THE BORDER. WHAT WOULD YOU BE DOING ABOUT WHAT WOULD YOU BE DOING ABOUT IT? IT? >> THE FIRST THING WE HAVE TO DO >> THE FIRST THING WE HAVE TO DO IS PUT ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO IS PUT ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO WORK AT THE BORDER. WORK AT THE BORDER. WE HAVE A SHORTAGE OF NOT JUST WE HAVE A SHORTAGE OF NOT JUST ASYLUM JUDGES AND FACILITIES, ASYLUM JUDGES AND FACILITIES, BUT EVEN BORDER PATROL BUT EVEN BORDER PATROL PERSONNEL. PERSONNEL. THERE ARE HUNDREDS, MAYBE THERE ARE HUNDREDS, MAYBE THOUSANDS OF UNFILLED POSITIONS, THOUSANDS OF UNFILLED POSITIONS, BECAUSE THESE POSITIONS DON'T BECAUSE THESE POSITIONS DON'T PAY AS COMPETITIVELY AS OTHER PAY AS COMPETITIVELY AS OTHER ROLES IN OUR GOVERNMENT. ROLES IN OUR GOVERNMENT. AND ALSO, THESE ARE NOT AND ALSO, THESE ARE NOT APPEALING PLACES TO LIVE. APPEALING PLACES TO LIVE. SO WE HAVE TO DO THE WORK THAT SO WE HAVE TO DO THE WORK THAT WE KNOW NEEDS TO BE DONE IN WE KNOW NEEDS TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO HAVE OUR POLICIES ORDER TO HAVE OUR POLICIES ACTUALLY BE EFFECTIVE ON THE ACTUALLY BE EFFECTIVE ON THE GROUND. GROUND. IT SERVES NOBODY IF THERE'S A IT SERVES NOBODY IF THERE'S A MULTI-MONTH OR EVEN YEAR-LONG MULTI-MONTH OR EVEN YEAR-LONG WAITING PROCESS TO HAVE AN WAITING PROCESS TO HAVE AN ASYLUM HEARING. ASYLUM HEARING. >> I WANT TO GO BACK TO YOUR >> I WANT TO GO BACK TO YOUR UNIVERSAL INCOME PROPOSAL, UNIVERSAL INCOME PROPOSAL, BECAUSE OUR DEBT IS ALREADY UP BECAUSE OUR DEBT IS ALREADY UP TO $20 TRILLION. TO $20 TRILLION. AND I KNOW IN SOME WAYS, IF YOU AND I KNOW IN SOME WAYS, IF YOU ALREADY GET SOME GOVERNMENT ALREADY GET SOME GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE, YOU WOULDN'T GET ASSISTANCE, YOU WOULDN'T GET THIS MONEY. THIS MONEY. BUT HOW DOES THIS NOT, EVEN IN BUT HOW DOES THIS NOT, EVEN IN THE SHORT-TERM, INFLATE OUR DEBT THE SHORT-TERM, INFLATE OUR DEBT AND PUT US IN A BUDGETARY CRISIS AND PUT US IN A BUDGETARY CRISIS GOING FORWARD? GOING FORWARD? >> WELL, IF YOU LOOK UP, CHUCK, >> WELL, IF YOU LOOK UP, CHUCK, WHO ARE THE BIG WINNERS IN THIS WHO ARE THE BIG WINNERS IN THIS ECONOMY? ECONOMY? IT'S AMAZON AND OTHER $1 IT'S AMAZON AND OTHER $1 TRILLION TECH COMPANIES. TRILLION TECH COMPANIES. AND IN AMAZON'S CASE, THEY'RE AND IN AMAZON'S CASE, THEY'RE LITERALLY PAYING ZERO IN FEDERAL LITERALLY PAYING ZERO IN FEDERAL TAXES. TAXES. YOU'RE 100% RIGHT THAT IF YOU YOU'RE 100% RIGHT THAT IF YOU HAVE THAT SITUATION, IT'S GOING HAVE THAT SITUATION, IT'S GOING TO BE VERY DIFFICULT ZPLP. TO BE VERY DIFFICULT ZPLP. >> SO YOU'RE GOING TO CHANGE THE >> SO YOU'RE GOING TO CHANGE THE TAX STRUCTURE FIRST BEFORE YOU TAX STRUCTURE FIRST BEFORE YOU HAND OUT THESE CHECKS? HAND OUT THESE CHECKS? >> WE DO IT SIMULTANEOUSLY. >> WE DO IT SIMULTANEOUSLY. AND WE WOULD BE TAKING MONEY AND WE WOULD BE TAKING MONEY FROM THE AMAZONS OF THE WORLD FROM THE AMAZONS OF THE WORLD AND PUT IT DIRECTLY INTO THE AND PUT IT DIRECTLY INTO THE HANDS OF AMERICAN CONSUMERS. HANDS OF AMERICAN CONSUMERS. >> EXPLAIN HOW THAT WORKS? >> EXPLAIN HOW THAT WORKS? JEFF BEZOS WILL WRITE YOU A JEFF BEZOS WILL WRITE YOU A CHECK? CHECK? >> WE'LL DO BETTER THAN THAT. >> WE'LL DO BETTER THAN THAT. WE'LL JOIN ANY OTHER ADVANCED WE'LL JOIN ANY OTHER ADVANCED ECONOMY IN THE WORLD AND HAVE A ECONOMY IN THE WORLD AND HAVE A VALUE-ADDED TAX WHICH WOULD GIVE VALUE-ADDED TAX WHICH WOULD GIVE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC A TINY SLICE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC A TINY SLICE OF EVERY AMAZON SALE, EVERY OF EVERY AMAZON SALE, EVERY GOOGLE SEARCH, EVERY FACEBOOK GOOGLE SEARCH, EVERY FACEBOOK ADD, EVERY ROBOT MILE. ADD, EVERY ROBOT MILE. >> AND IF YOU'RE THE NOMINEE, I >> AND IF YOU'RE THE NOMINEE, I HAVE SEEN PEOPLE PUSH EITHER A HAVE SEEN PEOPLE PUSH EITHER A FAIR TAX OR A VAT TAX OR A FAIR TAX OR A VAT TAX OR A NATIONAL SALES TAX. NATIONAL SALES TAX. AND EVERY CANDIDATE THAT HAS AND EVERY CANDIDATE THAT HAS TRIED TO PUT IT OUT THERE, IF TRIED TO PUT IT OUT THERE, IF THEY WIN A NOMINATION, THEY GET THEY WIN A NOMINATION, THEY GET EVISCERATED BECAUSE SOMEBODY EVISCERATED BECAUSE SOMEBODY BASICALLY SHOWS, HEY, LOOK AT BASICALLY SHOWS, HEY, LOOK AT HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO COST TO HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO COST TO TAKE YOUR KIDS BACK TO SCHOOL TAKE YOUR KIDS BACK TO SCHOOL NOW. NOW. LOOK AT HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO LOOK AT HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO COST TO BUY EVERYDAY PRODUCTS. COST TO BUY EVERYDAY PRODUCTS. HOW DO YOU BEAT BACK WHICH HAS HOW DO YOU BEAT BACK WHICH HAS BEEN A TRIED AND TRUED METHOD BEEN A TRIED AND TRUED METHOD POLITICALLY TO DEFEAT NATIONAL POLITICALLY TO DEFEAT NATIONAL SALES TAXES, TO DEFEAT THE VAT, SALES TAXES, TO DEFEAT THE VAT, THINGS LIKE THIS, WHERE PEOPLE THINGS LIKE THIS, WHERE PEOPLE SEE THE INITIAL BILL AND I DON'T SEE THE INITIAL BILL AND I DON'T CARE WHAT KIND OF REFUND CARE WHAT KIND OF REFUND SITUATION YOU PUT IN THERE, THAT SITUATION YOU PUT IN THERE, THAT DOES SCARE PEOPLE. DOES SCARE PEOPLE. >> WELL, IT'S MORE THAN A >> WELL, IT'S MORE THAN A REFUND, CHUCK. REFUND, CHUCK. IT'S ACTUALLY A DIVIDEND. IT'S ACTUALLY A DIVIDEND. AND FOR EVERY DOLLAR FROM THE AND FOR EVERY DOLLAR FROM THE VAT AMERICAN CONSUMERS WOULD BE VAT AMERICAN CONSUMERS WOULD BE RECEIVING $3. RECEIVING $3. IT WOULD INCREASE THE BUYING IT WOULD INCREASE THE BUYING POWER OF APPROXIMATELY THE 92% POWER OF APPROXIMATELY THE 92% OF AMERICANS. OF AMERICANS. AND AMERICANS UNDERSTAND WHAT AND AMERICANS UNDERSTAND WHAT $12,000 A YEAR WOULD MEAN FOR $12,000 A YEAR WOULD MEAN FOR THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES. THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES. VERY, VERY FEW AMERICANS WOULD VERY, VERY FEW AMERICANS WOULD CONSUME ENOUGH FOR A MILD VAT CONSUME ENOUGH FOR A MILD VAT COME ANYWHERE NEAR COME ANYWHERE NEAR COUNTERBALANCING A $1,000 VAT A COUNTERBALANCING A $1,000 VAT A MONTH. MONTH. >> SO LET'S MOVE ON TO THE >> SO LET'S MOVE ON TO THE SITUATION IN IRAN. SITUATION IN IRAN. HOW WOULD YOU TRY TO DEAL WITH HOW WOULD YOU TRY TO DEAL WITH IRAN'S BELLIGERENT NATURE IN THE IRAN'S BELLIGERENT NATURE IN THE MIDDLE EAST? MIDDLE EAST? THE BIGGEST CRITICISM OF THE BIGGEST CRITICISM OF PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE IRAN PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL WAS, OKAY, THE GOOD NUCLEAR DEAL WAS, OKAY, THE GOOD NEWS IS, YOU GOT THEM TO AGREE NEWS IS, YOU GOT THEM TO AGREE ON SOME LIMITS WHEN IT COMES TO ON SOME LIMITS WHEN IT COMES TO THE NUCLEAR ISSUE. THE NUCLEAR ISSUE. BUT IT DID NOTHING WHEN IT CAME BUT IT DID NOTHING WHEN IT CAME TO THEM FUNDING TERRORIST TO THEM FUNDING TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS AND THINGS LIKE ORGANIZATIONS AND THINGS LIKE THAT THAT THAT. THAT. WHAT WOULD YOUR ADMINISTRATION WHAT WOULD YOUR ADMINISTRATION DO TO CURTAIL SOME OF THAT BAD DO TO CURTAIL SOME OF THAT BAD BEHAVIOR BY IRAN? BEHAVIOR BY IRAN? >> I WOULD LOOK TO VEREENTER THE >> I WOULD LOOK TO VEREENTER THE NUCLEAR DEAL. NUCLEAR DEAL. EVEN AFTER THE U.S. PULLED OUT EVEN AFTER THE U.S. PULLED OUT UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, THERE ARE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT THERE ARE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT SIGNED ON THAT ARE STILL THERE. SIGNED ON THAT ARE STILL THERE. WE NEED TO DE-ESCALATE TENSIONS WE NEED TO DE-ESCALATE TENSIONS IN THE IRAN REGION AND MAKE IT IN THE IRAN REGION AND MAKE IT SO THAT THE IRAN GOVERNMENT'S SO THAT THE IRAN GOVERNMENT'S INCENTIVES ARE ACTUALLY ALIGNED INCENTIVES ARE ACTUALLY ALIGNED WITH OURS IN TERMS OF BOTH WITH OURS IN TERMS OF BOTH DE-ESCALATING THE NUCLEAR DE-ESCALATING THE NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT AND HOPEFULLY DEVELOPMENT AND HOPEFULLY GETTING THEM TO REDUCE THEIR GETTING THEM TO REDUCE THEIR FUNDING OF TERRORIST FUNDING OF TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN OTHER PARTS OF ORGANIZATIONS IN OTHER PARTS OF THE REGION. THE REGION. >> DO YOU HAVE A THEORY OF THE >> DO YOU HAVE A THEORY OF THE CASE ON HOW TO DEAL WITH THE CASE ON HOW TO DEAL WITH THE TRUMP MEAT GRINDER? TRUMP MEAT GRINDER? YOU KNOW, HE HAS A DIFFERENT WAY YOU KNOW, HE HAS A DIFFERENT WAY OF TALKING TO THE PUBLIC, OF OF TALKING TO THE PUBLIC, OF TALKING TO CANDIDATES. TALKING TO CANDIDATES. WHY WILL YOU BE DIFFERENT AT WHY WILL YOU BE DIFFERENT AT HANDLING THE TRUMP-STYLE OF HANDLING THE TRUMP-STYLE OF POLITICAL CAMPAIGN DIFFERENTLY POLITICAL CAMPAIGN DIFFERENTLY THAN OTHERS HAVE TRIED AND THAN OTHERS HAVE TRIED AND FAILED AT? FAILED AT? >> WELL, THEY SAY, CHUCK, THAT >> WELL, THEY SAY, CHUCK, THAT THE OPPOSITE OF DONALD TRUMP IS THE OPPOSITE OF DONALD TRUMP IS AN ASIAN MAN WHO LIKES MATH. AN ASIAN MAN WHO LIKES MATH. AND I'M ALREADY PEELING OFF AND I'M ALREADY PEELING OFF THOUSANDS OF TRUMP SUPPORTERS, THOUSANDS OF TRUMP SUPPORTERS, INDEPENDENTS, LIBERTARIANS, INDEPENDENTS, LIBERTARIANS, CONSERVATIVES, AS WELL AS CONSERVATIVES, AS WELL AS OBVIOUSLY DEMOCRATS AND OBVIOUSLY DEMOCRATS AND PROGRESSIVES. PROGRESSIVES. BUT I AGREE WITH MANY OF YOUR BUT I AGREE WITH MANY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES THAT WE NEED TO BE COLLEAGUES THAT WE NEED TO BE FOCUSED ON BEATING DONALD TRUMP FOCUSED ON BEATING DONALD TRUMP AND I'M THE IDEAL CANDIDATE FOR AND I'M THE IDEAL CANDIDATE FOR THAT. THAT. >> BUT DOES THAT MEAN TAKING HIM >> BUT DOES THAT MEAN TAKING HIM ON DIRECTLY? ON DIRECTLY? LEAVING THESE THINGS, NOT LEAVING THESE THINGS, NOT LETTING STUFF GO UNANSWERED? LETTING STUFF GO UNANSWERED? OR IS IT IGNORING SOME OF THE OR IS IT IGNORING SOME OF THE ANTICS? ANTICS? >> IT'S ABOUT CUTTING TO THE >> IT'S ABOUT CUTTING TO THE HEART OF THE MATTER AND THE HEART OF THE MATTER AND THE TRUTH. TRUTH. AND I'VE TALKED TO MANY PEOPLE AND I'VE TALKED TO MANY PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR DONALD TRUMP WHO WHO VOTED FOR DONALD TRUMP WHO RECOGNIZE THAT HIS BLUSTER IS RECOGNIZE THAT HIS BLUSTER IS NOT SERVING THEM WELL. NOT SERVING THEM WELL. IT'S ONE REASON WHY MANY IT'S ONE REASON WHY MANY AMERICANS WHO VOTED FOR DONALD AMERICANS WHO VOTED FOR DONALD TRUMP ARE LOOKING FOR A TRUMP ARE LOOKING FOR A DIFFERENT SOLUTION. DIFFERENT SOLUTION. AND I'M HAPPY TO SAY THAT MY AND I'M HAPPY TO SAY THAT MY CAMPAIGN IS DRAWING MANY OF CAMPAIGN IS DRAWING MANY OF THOSE VOTERS OVER TO OUR SIDE OF THOSE VOTERS OVER TO OUR SIDE OF THE AISLE. THE AISLE. >> WHY AREN'T YOU RUNNING FOR A >> WHY AREN'T YOU RUNNING FOR A LOWER OFFICE FIRST AND MAYBE SEE LOWER OFFICE FIRST AND MAYBE SEE IF YOU CAN WIN AND GET MORE IF YOU CAN WIN AND GET MORE PEOPLE TO MAINSTREAM YOUR PEOPLE TO MAINSTREAM YOUR PROPOSALS? PROPOSALS? I JUST SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, I JUST SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, SHOOTING FOR THE PRESIDENCY, I SHOOTING FOR THE PRESIDENCY, I GET IT. GET IT. IT IS ONE WAY, AND YOU'RE IT IS ONE WAY, AND YOU'RE CERTAINLY GETTING MORE ATTENTION CERTAINLY GETTING MORE ATTENTION THAN YOU WOULD IF YOU WERE THAN YOU WOULD IF YOU WERE RUNNING FOR THE U.S. SENATE RUNNING FOR THE U.S. SENATE SOMEWHERE, BUT ISN'T IT MORE SOMEWHERE, BUT ISN'T IT MORE PRACTICAL TO TRY TO BUILD THIS PRACTICAL TO TRY TO BUILD THIS GROUND UP? GROUND UP? >> CHUCK, I DEARLY WISH THAT I >> CHUCK, I DEARLY WISH THAT I FELT LIKE WE HAD THE TIME. FELT LIKE WE HAD THE TIME. BUT THE REALITY IS THAT ROBOT BUT THE REALITY IS THAT ROBOT TRUCKS ARE FIVE TO TEN YEARS TRUCKS ARE FIVE TO TEN YEARS AWAY FROM HITTING OUR HIGHWAYS AWAY FROM HITTING OUR HIGHWAYS AND DRIVING A TRUCK IS THE MOST AND DRIVING A TRUCK IS THE MOST COMMON JOB. COMMON JOB. 39% OF OUR MALLS ARE CLOSING IN 39% OF OUR MALLS ARE CLOSING IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. SO IF I TOOK DECADES TO TRY TO SO IF I TOOK DECADES TO TRY TO CLIMB THE POLITICAL LADDER, CLIMB THE POLITICAL LADDER, UNFORTUNATELY, OUR ECONOMY WOULD UNFORTUNATELY, OUR ECONOMY WOULD BE TRANSFORMING UNDERNEATH OUR BE TRANSFORMING UNDERNEATH OUR FEET. FEET. WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE TIME FOR WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE TIME FOR SOMEONE TO PLAY POLITICAL SOMEONE TO PLAY POLITICAL GAMESMANSHIP. GAMESMANSHIP. >> ALL RIGHT. >> ALL RIGHT. ANDREW YANG, AS I SAID, ONE OF ANDREW YANG, AS I SAID, ONE OF THE MORE UNUSUAL CANDIDATES AND
B1 中級 米 アンドリュー・ヤンの完全版。トランプ支持者の数千人をすでにはがしている|MTP Daily|MSNBC (Full Andrew Yang: I'm Already Peeling Off Thousands Of Trump Supporters | MTP Daily | MSNBC) 5 0 王惟惟 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日 シェア シェア 保存 報告 動画の中の単語