COMPLICIT KOOL-AID, AND ACTUALLY HAVE A PRETTY UNFAVORABLE VIEW

OF THE FIRST DAUGHTER, IVANKA TRUMP.

A RECENT POLL FOUND THAT ONLY 21% OF WOMEN AGED 18 THROUGH 24

ñ AGED 18 - 34 HAVE AN UNFAVORABLE VIEW OF HER.

LET'S TAKE A LOOK.

AND THAT HER FAVORABILITY ACTUALLY INCREASES AS WOMEN

GET OLDER, WHICH IS REALLY INTERESTING.

I WANT TO COME BACK TO THIS IN A SECOND, BUT FIRST I WANT TO LOOK

AT THE MALE BREAKDOWN, BECAUSE MEN ACTUALLY HAVE A MORE

FAVORABLE VIEW OF IVANKA.

I BET THEY DO.

YOU CAN SEE SOME INCREASES THERE, AND THEN GOING BACK TO

WOMEN AGED 18 THROUGH 34, THERE IS A PARTISAN BREAK THERE.

AND THIS IS

ACTUALLY REALLY IMPORTANT, BECAUSE I THINK

IVANKA IS SORT OF HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR BEING LIKE,

THE WOMAN.

I THINK SHE'S THE TOKEN WOMAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE, BESIDES

KELLYANNE CONWAY.

BUT IVANKA IS REALLY HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANY ANTI-WOMAN

POLICY OR ANTIWOMAN RHETORIC IS WHY THINK IT MAKES SENSE

THAT SHE WOULD BE UNFAVORABLE AMONGST YOUNG WOMEN, WHO

ARE COMMONLY MORE LIBERAL, RIGHT?

THERE'S A COUPLE THINGS HERE.

AS YOU POINT OUT, PROGRESSIVES ARE SO MUCH MORE LIBERAL ñ

SORRY, YOUNG PEOPLE ARE SO MUCH MORE LIBERAL AND

PROGRESSIVE THAN PREVIOUS GENERATIONS, THAT OLDER

GENERATIONS HAVE A HARD TIME COMPREHENDING IT.

THEY STILL WANT TO TALK ABOUT LEFT, RIGHT AND ALL THAT STUFF.

THERE IS VERY LITTLE RIGHT TO SPEAK OF IN 18 TO 34-YEAR-OLDS.

IN THE INTERMEDIATES HARD FOR THEM TO GET THAT THROUGH THEIR

HEAD, WHAT DO YOU MEAN?

DONALD TRUMP IS PRESIDENT, SO BREITBART MUST BE DOING

WELL AMONG THE KIDS.

SO, THERE'S SOME TEENAGE BOYS WHO ARE TROLLS ONLINE, AND

THEY ENJOY BEING TROLLS.

I'M FAMILIAR WITH THEM.

YES, WE ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH THEM.

SO, YES YOU HAVE SOME 15 TO 17-YEAR-OLD

WHO ARE KNUCKLEHEADS, AND TO ENJOY THAT STUFF, BUT OF

COURSE AMONG YOUNG WOMEN SHE IS NOT GOING TO BE LIKED,

BECAUSE THEY ARE VERY PROGRESSIVE AND SHE IS NOT.

THE SECOND PART OF THIS IS THAT SHE IS A FRAUD, AND IT IS

HARDER TO TRICK MILLENNIAL'S, BECAUSE THEY GET THEIR

INFORMATION ONLINE, SO THEY CAN ACTUALLY LOOK UP WHAT HER

POLICY POSITIONS ARE, AND THEY CAN SEE WITH THEIR OWN EYES

THAT SHE IS SUPPORTING DONALD TRUMP, WHO DON'T DO ANY OF

THE THINGS THAT SHE CLAIMS SHE IS IN FAVOR OF; WHEREAS, IN

THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, THEY DO THESE NARRATIVES.

THEY CALL THEM NARRATIVES.

AND A NARRATIVE FOR IVANKA TRUMP IS THAT SHE IS AIMED MODERATING

FORCE ON DONALD TRUMP, AND THAT SHE IS HELPING HIM WITH

WOMEN, WHY?

BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN AND SHE IS RELATIVELY YOUNG.

NOW WE HAVE POLLING THAT SAYS THE OPPOSITE, BUT TV GUYS WILL

DO THE SAME ñ WILL DO IT ANYWAY.

WHEN I HEAR PEOPLE SPEAK FAVORABLY ABOUT IVANKA, IT

IS USUALLY FROM OLDER WOMEN.

THEY ARE COMING FROM A FEMINIST BACKGROUND AND THEY WANT TO

SUPPORT A WOMAN WHO IS HAVING A SAY ON TAKING CARE OF PEOPLE WHO

ARE COMICALLY ATTACKED IN SYRIAC, AND THINGS LIKE THAT,

AND SHE IS A BUSINESSWOMAN AND ALL THOSE THINGS.

BUT FOR A LOT OF YOUNGER WOMEN, WE'LL JUST LOOK AT A WOMAN

BLINDLY AND SAY WE HAVE TO SUPPORT THEM, BECAUSE THERE'S A

LOT OF WOMEN OUT THERE WHO SPEW A LOT OF HATRED AND BIGOTRY,

AND THIS IS A PARTICULAR WOMAN WHO, IF SHE IS SUPPOSEDLY

MODERATING THE PRESIDENT, SHE'S NOT DOING A VERY GOOD JOB AT IT.

I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO HIGHLIGHT THE NOTION THAT

MANY PEOPLE WILL OFTEN EXCUSE THESE RATINGS BY SIDLEY

STATING THAT, IT'S BECAUSE SHE'S DONALD TRUMP'S DAUGHTER,

AND PEOPLE DON'T LIKE DONALD TRUMP, SO THEY ARE

NECESSARILY NOT GOING TO LIKE HIS DAUGHTER.

THAT MAY BE THE CASE IN SOME INSTANCES, BUT AS YOU MENTIONED,

IT'S IMPORTANT THAT SHE IS ACTUALLY HELD ACCOUNTABLE,

BECAUSE SHE DOES HAVE A BIG ROLE, AND IF SHE IS PUSHING THIS

NARRATIVE THAT SHE IS HERE TO PUSH FORWARD WOMEN'S RIGHTS, TO

TRY AND IMPROVE DONALD TRUMP'S PREVIOUS POLICIES THAT WE KNOW

HE'S NOT BEEN IN FAVOR OF WOMEN, AND HASN'T PUSHED FOR

POLICIES TO HELP WOMEN, AS HE IS LOOKING TO ROLLBACK PLANNED

PARENTHOOD, IF SHE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT, SHE'S

NOT DOING A GOOD JOB AT THAT.

SO RATHER THAN SCRUTINIZE HER BECAUSE SHE'S DONALD

TRUMP'S DAUGHTER, NO NO NO.

SHE'S GOT A ROLE, AND IT'S SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO WOMEN

AND POLITICS, I'M NOT GOING TO SUGARCOAT HER, SHE HAS A ROLE

THAT SHE HAS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR.

SHE IS NOT BEING A ROLE MODEL BECAUSE SHE IS NOT FILLING

THOSE DUTIES THAT SHE SAID SHE WAS GOING TO DO.

TO BACK UP WHAT BOTH OF YOU ARE SAYING, THE PROOF IS IN THE

PUDDING.

I DON'T KNOW IF SHE IS A MODERATING INFLUENCE.

I HOPE SHE IS.

I SEE ARTICLES WRITTEN ABOUT HOW SHE IS FIGHTING AGAINST STEVE

AND IN BEHIND-THE-SCENES, AND IF SHE WINDS UP HELPING STEVE

BANNON ñ HELPING GET STEVE THEN AND OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE,

THEN I'LL GIVE HER CREDIT FOR THAT.

CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE.

BUT IN TERMS OF WOMEN'S ISSUES, SHE HASN'T HELPED AT ALL.

EVEN IF SHE INTENDS TO HELP, SHE HASN'T.

SHE HELPS GET DONALD TRUMP ELECTED, AND HE HAS BEEN

DISASTROUS FOR WOMEN'S RIGHTS.

YOU KNOW THAT HE CUT FUNDING FOR PROGRAMS ON REFLECTIVE RIGHTS,

AND EVEN ONES THAT BARELY HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH ABORTION, AS

A PUBLIC AND ñ AS A PUBLIC AND PRESIDENTS DO, ETC.

AT ñ AS REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS DO.

BUT A PROGRAM THAT HE CUT, IT WAS A UNITED NATIONS

PROGRAM, AND ONE THING THAT DOES IS IT HELPS FIGHT AGAINST

GENITAL MUTILATION, AND HE CUTS THE FUNDING FOR THAT ANYWAY.

SO, IF IVANKA TRUMP SAYS SHE'S HELPING WOMEN BEHIND-THE-SCENES,

WELL WE HAVEN'T SEEN IT IN FRONT OF THE SCENES AT ALL YET.