B1 中級 3417 タグ追加 保存
動画の字幕をクリックしてすぐ単語の意味を調べられます!
単語帳読み込み中…
字幕の修正報告
The following are my opinions,
and do not reflect the opinions or policies
of any particular prosecutor's office.
(Laughter)
I am a prosecutor.
I believe in law and order.
I am the adopted son of a police officer, a Marine and a hairdresser.
I believe in accountability
and that we should all be safe in our communities.
I love my job
and the people that do it.
I just think that it's our responsibility
to do it better.
By a show of hands,
how many of you, by the age of 25,
had either acted up in school,
went somewhere you were specifically told to stay out of,
or drank alcohol before your legal age?
(Laughter)
All right.
How many of you shoplifted,
tried an illegal drug
or got into a physical fight --
yes, even with a sibling?
Now, how many of you ever spent one day in jail
for any of those decisions?
How many of you sitting here today
think that you're a danger to society
or should be defined by those actions of youthful indiscretion?
(Laughter)
Point taken.
When we talk about criminal justice reform,
we often focus on a few things,
and that's what I want to talk to you about today.
But first I'm going to -- since you shared with me,
I'm going to give you a confession on my part.
I went to law school
to make money.
I had no interest in being a public servant,
I had no interest in criminal law,
and I definitely didn't think that I would ever be a prosecutor.
Near the end of my first year of law school, I got an internship
in the Roxbury Division of Boston Municipal Court.
I knew of Roxbury as an impoverished neighborhood in Boston,
plagued by gun violence and drug crime.
My life and my legal career changed the first day of that internship.
I walked into a courtroom, and I saw an auditorium of people
who, one by one, would approach the front of that courtroom
to say two words and two words only:
"Not guilty."
They were predominately black and brown.
And then a judge, a defense attorney and a prosecutor
would make life-altering decisions about that person without their input.
They were predominately white.
As each person, one by one, approached the front of that courtroom,
I couldn't stop but think:
How did they get here?
I wanted to know their stories.
And as the prosecutor read the facts of each case,
I was thinking to myself,
we could have predicted that.
That seems so preventable...
not because I was an expert in criminal law,
but because it was common sense.
Over the course of the internship,
I began to recognize people in the auditorium,
not because they were criminal masterminds
but because they were coming to us for help
and we were sending them out without any.
My second year of law school I worked as a paralegal for a defense attorney,
and in that experience I met many young men accused of murder.
Even in our "worst," I saw human stories.
And they all contained childhood trauma,
victimization, poverty, loss,
disengagement from school,
early interaction with the police and the criminal justice system,
all leading to a seat in a courtroom.
Those convicted of murder were condemned to die in prison,
and it was during those meetings with those men that I couldn't fathom
why we would spend so much money
to keep this one person in jail for the next 80 years
when we could have reinvested it up front,
and perhaps prevented the whole thing from happening in the first place.
(Applause)
My third year of law school,
I defended people accused of small street crimes,
mostly mentally ill,
mostly homeless,
mostly drug-addicted,
all in need of help.
They would come to us,
and we would send them away without that help.
They were in need of our assistance.
But we weren't giving them any.
Prosecuted, adjudged and defended
by people who knew nothing about them.
The staggering inefficiency is what drove me to criminal justice work.
The unfairness of it all made me want to be a defender.
The power dynamic that I came to understand
made me become a prosecutor.
I don't want to spend a lot of time talking about the problem.
We know the criminal justice system needs reform,
we know there are 2.3 million people in American jails and prisons,
making us the most incarcerated nation on the planet.
We know there's another seven million people on probation or parole,
we know that the criminal justice system
disproportionately affects people of color,
particularly poor people of color.
And we know there are system failures happening everywhere
that bring people to our courtrooms.
But what we do not discuss
is how ill-equipped our prosecutors are to receive them.
When we talk about criminal justice reform,
we, as a society, focus on three things.
We complain, we tweet, we protest
about the police, about sentencing laws
and about prison.
We rarely, if ever, talk about the prosecutor.
In the fall of 2009,
a young man was arrested by the Boston Police Department.
He was 18 years old, he was African American
and he was a senior at a local public school.
He had his sights set on college
but his part-time, minimum-wage job wasn't providing the financial opportunity
he needed to enroll in school.
In a series of bad decisions,
he stole 30 laptops from a store and sold them on the Internet.
This led to his arrest
and a criminal complaint of 30 felony charges.
The potential jail time he faced is what stressed Christopher out the most.
But what he had little understanding of
was the impact a criminal record would have on his future.
I was standing in arraignments that day
when Christopher's case came across my desk.
And at the risk of sounding dramatic, in that moment,
I had Christopher's life in my hands.
I was 29 years old, a brand-new prosecutor,
and I had little appreciation for how the decisions I would make
would impact Christopher's life.
Christopher's case was a serious one
and it needed to be dealt with as such,
but I didn't think branding him a felon for the rest of his life
was the right answer.
For the most part, prosecutors step onto the job
with little appreciation of the impact of our decisions,
regardless of our intent.
Despite our broad discretion,
we learn to avoid risk at all cost,
rendering our discretion
basically useless.
History has conditioned us to believe that somehow,
the criminal justice system brings about accountability
and improves public safety,
despite evidence to the contrary.
We're judged internally and externally by our convictions and our trial wins,
so prosecutors aren't really incentivized to be creative
at our case dispositions,
or to take risks on people we might not otherwise.
We stick to an outdated method,
counterproductive to achieving the very goal that we all want,
and that's safer communities.
Yet most prosecutors standing in my space would have arraigned Christopher.
They have little appreciation for what we can do.
Arraigning Christopher would give him a criminal record,
making it harder for him to get a job,
setting in motion a cycle
that defines the failing criminal justice system today.
With a criminal record and without a job,
Christopher would be unable to find employment, education or stable housing.
Without those protective factors in his life,
Christopher would be more likely to commit further, more serious crime.
The more contact Christopher had with the criminal justice system,
the more likely it would be that he would return again
and again and again --
all at tremendous social cost to his children, to his family
and to his peers.
And, ladies and gentlemen,
it is a terrible public safety outcome for the rest of us.
When I came out of law school,
I did the same thing as everybody else.
I came out as a prosecutor expected to do justice,
but I never learned what justice was in my classes --
none of us do.
None of us do.
And yet, prosecutors are the most powerful actors
in the criminal justice system.
Our power is virtually boundless.
In most cases, not the judge,
not the police, not the legislature,
not the mayor, not the governor, not the President
can tell us how to prosecute our cases.
The decision to arraign Christopher and give him a criminal record
was exclusively mine.
I would choose whether to prosecute him for 30 felonies, for one felony,
for a misdemeanor,
or at all.
I would choose whether to leverage Christopher into a plea deal
or take the case to trial, and ultimately,
I would be in a position to ask for Christopher to go to jail.
These are decisions that prosecutors make every day unfettered,
and we are unaware and untrained
of the grave consequences of those decisions.
One night this past summer,
I was at a small gathering of professional men of color
from around the city.
As I stood there stuffing free finger sandwiches into my mouth,
as you do as public servant --
(Laughter)
I noticed across the room,
a young man waving and smiling at me and approaching me.
And I recognized him, but I couldn't place from where,
and before I knew it, this young man was hugging me.
And thanking me.
"You cared about me, and you changed my life."
It was Christopher.
See, I never arraigned Christopher.
He never faced a judge or a jail,
he never had a criminal record.
Instead, I worked with Christopher;
first on being accountable for his actions,
and then, putting him in a position where he wouldn't re-offend.
We recovered 75 percent of the computers that he sold
and gave them back to Best Buy,
and came up with a financial plan
to repay for the computers we couldn't recover.
Christopher did community service.
He wrote an essay reflecting on how this case could impact his future
and that of the community.
He applied to college,
he obtained financial aid,
and he went on to graduate from a four-year school.
(Applause)
After we finished hugging, I looked at his name tag,
to learn that Christopher was the manager of a large bank in Boston.
Christopher had accomplished -- and making a lot more money than me --
(Laughter)
He had accomplished all of this
in the six years since I had first seen him in Roxbury Court.
I can't take credit for Christopher's journey to success,
but I certainly did my part to keep him on the path.
There are thousands of Christophers out there,
some locked in our jails and prisons.
We need thousands of prosecutors
to recognize that and to protect them.
An employed Christopher is better for public safety than a condemned one.
It's a bigger win for all of us.
In retrospect, the decision not to throw the book at Christopher
makes perfect sense.
When I saw him that first day in Roxbury Court,
I didn't see a criminal standing there.
I saw myself -- a young person in need of intervention.
As an individual caught selling a large quantity of drugs in my late teens,
I knew firsthand the power of opportunity
as opposed to the wrath of the criminal justice system.
Along the way, with the help and guidance of my district attorney,
my supervisor and judges,
I learned the power of the prosecutor
to change lives instead of ruining them.
And that's how we do it in Boston.
We helped a woman who was arrested for stealing groceries to feed her kids
get a job.
Instead of putting an abused teenager in adult jail
for punching another teenager,
we secured mental health treatment and community supervision.
A runaway girl who was arrested
for prostituting, to survive on the streets,
needed a safe place to live and grow --
something we could help her with.
I even helped a young man
who was so afraid of the older gang kids showing up after school,
that one morning instead of a lunchbox into his backpack,
he put a loaded 9-millimeter.
We would spend our time that we'd normally take prepping our cases
for months and months for trial down the road
by coming up with real solutions to the problems as they presented.
Which is the better way to spend our time?
How would you prefer your prosecutors to spend theirs?
Why are we spending 80 billion dollars
on a prison industry that we know is failing,
when we could take that money and reallocate it into education,
into mental health treatment,
into substance abuse treatment
and to community investment so we can develop our neighborhoods?
(Applause)
So why should this matter to you?
Well, one, we're spending a lot of money.
Our money.
It costs 109,000 dollars in some states
to lock up a teenager for a year,
with a 60 percent chance that that person will return to the very same system.
That is a terrible return on investment.
Number two: it's the right thing to do.
If prosecutors were a part of creating the problem,
it's incumbent on us to create a solution
and we can do that using other disciplines
that have already done the data and research for us.
And number three:
your voice and your vote can make that happen.
The next time there's a local district attorney's election
in your jurisdiction,
ask candidates these questions.
One: What are you doing to make me and my neighbors safer?
Two: What data are you collecting,
and how are you training your prosecutors
to make sure that it's working?
And number three:
If it's not working for everybody,
what are you doing to fix it?
If they can't answer the questions,
they shouldn't be doing the job.
Each one of you that raised your hand at the beginning of this talk
is a living, breathing example of the power of opportunity,
of intervention,
of support
and of love.
While each of you may have faced your own brand of discipline
for whatever malfeasances you committed,
barely any of you needed a day in jail
to make you the people that you are today --
some of the greatest minds on the planet.
Every day, thousands of times a day,
prosecutors around the United States wield power so great
that it can bring about catastrophe
as quickly as it can bring about opportunity,
intervention,
support
and yes, even love.
Those qualities are the hallmarks of a strong community,
and a strong community is a safe one.
If our communities are broken,
don't let the lawyers that you elect fix them
with outdated, inefficient, expensive methods.
Demand more; vote for the prosecutor who's helping people stay out of jail,
not putting them in.
Demand better.
You deserve it, your children deserve it,
the people who are tied up in the system deserve it,
but most of all,
the people that we are sworn to protect and do justice for demand it.
We must,
we must do better.
Thank you.
(Applause)
Thank you.
(Applause)
Thank you very much.
コツ:単語をクリックしてすぐ意味を調べられます!

読み込み中…

【TED】アダム・フォス: 検察官が訴える、これからの刑事司法制度の姿 (A prosecutor's vision for a better justice system | Adam Foss)

3417 タグ追加 保存
chloe 2016 年 7 月 20 日 に公開
お勧め動画
  1. 1. クリック一つで単語を検索

    右側のスプリクトの単語をクリックするだけで即座に意味が検索できます。

  2. 2. リピート機能

    クリックするだけで同じフレーズを何回もリピート可能!

  3. 3. ショートカット

    キーボードショートカットを使うことによって勉強の効率を上げることが出来ます。

  4. 4. 字幕の表示/非表示

    日・英のボタンをクリックすることで自由に字幕のオンオフを切り替えられます。

  5. 5. 動画をブログ等でシェア

    コードを貼り付けてVoiceTubeの動画再生プレーヤーをブログ等でシェアすることが出来ます!

  6. 6. 全画面再生

    左側の矢印をクリックすることで全画面で再生できるようになります。

  1. クイズ付き動画

    リスニングクイズに挑戦!

  1. クリックしてメモを表示

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔