Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • Prof: Good morning.

  • From the time of Julius Caesar, we have seen the rulers of Rome

  • brag about building buildings that were bigger than any others

  • in the world.

  • You'll remember Caesar referred to his Temple of Mars in that

  • way, that he was building the largest Temple of Mars in the

  • world.

  • And we also saw the same for Domitian, with his palace on the

  • Palatine Hill; for Trajan with his enormous

  • forum; for Hadrian,

  • building the greatest-- largest dome that had been

  • built up until that time and, as we discussed,

  • still the largest diameter dome in the city of Rome today;

  • and Hadrian's Villa at Tivoli, just as a selection of

  • examples.

  • We are going to see today that if bigger was better,

  • biggest is best, and in the case of the emperor

  • Caracalla, an emperor who was a

  • megalomaniac, in the tradition of Nero and

  • Domitian, that he built the largest

  • imperial bath structure to date.

  • And we're going to be looking at that bath structure today,

  • and we're going to see it as really a colossal and

  • fascinating building, in all kinds of ways.

  • But before I get to that--in fact,

  • we'll end with that bath structure today--

  • before I get to that, I would like to look with you

  • at architecture in Rome, in the second and third

  • centuries A.D., and we'll see that architecture

  • is quite varied in terms of whether it's private,

  • it's civic, it's also funerary.

  • I want to begin though by just reminding you of what we talked

  • about last time.

  • We looked at the city of Ostia, and we looked at the city of

  • Ostia, the port of Rome, in its entirety;

  • once again, its public buildings, its civic structures,

  • its commercial enterprises.

  • And we also went, at the very end of the lecture,

  • out to Isola Sacra, where the tombs of those who

  • lived in Ostia were located.

  • And I show you a couple of those again now on the screen;

  • these brick-faced tombs, these tombs that are made of

  • concrete, at Isola Sacra,

  • that were put up for the professionals,

  • for the traders, the commercial merchants and so

  • on that lived in the city of Ostia.

  • They were made of brick-faced concrete construction.

  • They had barrel vaults or groin vaults inside.

  • And you can see also that they were faced with brick,

  • and they were faced with brick, as we discussed,

  • that was exposed; the idea of brick being

  • attractive in its own right, a fabulously beautiful facing,

  • that they take advantage of in the second century A.D.,

  • and decide not to stucco it over, as you can see so well

  • here.

  • The doorways into those tombs, surrounded by travertine jambs

  • and lintels, the inscription in the center,

  • the small slit windows, and then a pediment at the top.

  • We saw, when we looked at funerary architecture in the age

  • of Augustus, for example, that is was very varied;

  • very varied.

  • Tombs in the shape of pyramids, in the shape of circular tombs.

  • Tombs that made reference to bakeries, like the Tomb of the

  • Baker Eurysaces.

  • There is still a certain amount of variety in tomb architecture

  • in the second century A.D., but they tend to hone in on one

  • type in particular, and that type is the so-called

  • house tomb type; which is exactly what we see

  • here, a tomb that is rectangular in shape, for the most part,

  • boxlike, and does resemble, very closely,

  • a house; this close relationship that

  • we've talked about so many times this semester between houses of

  • the living and houses of the dead.

  • So we looked at those last time.

  • And where I want to begin today is just to demonstrate to you

  • that these same kinds of house tombs that we see in Ostia and

  • Isola Sacra, in the second century A.D.,

  • we also see in Rome.

  • And in some cases they are commissioned by individuals of

  • comparable social status, to those in Ostia,

  • but sometimes they are commissioned by the most elite.

  • And I'd like to begin with an example of a similar tomb

  • commissioned by the most elite.

  • This is the so-called Tomb of Annia Regilla,

  • in Rome.

  • It was put up on the famous via Appia, or the Appian Way.

  • It dates to around A.D. 161.

  • In this case we know who the commissioner was,

  • and I can show you what he looked like as well.

  • You see him here, on the right-hand side of the

  • screen.

  • He was a man by the name of Herodes Atticus;

  • I've put his name on the Monument List for you,

  • Herodes Atticus.

  • Herodes Atticus was actually a Greek.

  • He was Athenian, from the Greek part of the

  • Empire.

  • He lived in Athens, for the most part,

  • and he commissioned a very famous music hall,

  • an odeon, which still survives.

  • You can see it over here.

  • It's without its roof today, but it was originally one of

  • these roofed music halls, an odeon.

  • It is located on the slope of the Acropolis in Athens;

  • the Acropolis that of course we know primarily for its great

  • architectural feats of the fifth century B.C.

  • in Greece.

  • This is the Roman building, put up by Herodes in the second

  • century, and we see it on the slope of the Acropolis,

  • very well preserved.

  • In modern times its greatest fame is the fact that Yanni

  • performed his "Live at the Acropolis"

  • concert at the Odeon of Herodes Atticus.

  • And even if you don't like Yanni, it's actually quite an

  • interesting concert to view-- and one can view it in video

  • and so on-- because it does take such

  • wonderful advantage of this extraordinary ancient structure,

  • as Yanni presents his music.

  • At any rate, at one point Herodes Atticus,

  • who had a lot of connections, not only in Athens but around

  • the Empire, at one point,

  • through those connections, he gets himself appointed a

  • senator in Rome, and in order to take up that

  • position he needs to leave Athens behind and go spend some

  • time in Rome, and he and his wife,

  • Annia Regilla, set up house in Rome.

  • Annia Regilla, unfortunately,

  • dies in Rome, and he needs to bury her,

  • and he decides to bury her in Rome,

  • instead of in Athens, and he builds for her a tomb on

  • the Appian Way, on the Via Appia,

  • in around 161 A.D.; that's the date that we believe

  • she died.

  • And we see a view of that tomb here.

  • What we're looking at--and you probably recognize this already

  • because we've looked at a number of models from this museum of

  • casts in Rome, the Museo della Civiltà

  • Romana, in EUR in Rome.

  • And I show you two views of this model of the Tomb of Annia

  • Regilla; one that we see from the front

  • and another that we see from, if we're facing the monument,

  • the left side of the tomb.

  • And these are extremely helpful, because they give us a

  • very good sense of what we are dealing with here.

  • It is clear that we are dealing with a tomb type that is not

  • that different from what we saw in Ostia;

  • although this looks more like a temple than it looks like a

  • house.

  • And you can see that right off.

  • It looks exactly like a typical Roman temple.

  • We see that it is on a high podium;

  • it has a deep porch; it has freestanding columns in

  • that porch; it has a single staircase on

  • the front of the structure; has a façade orientation;

  • then an entranceway into the structure.

  • It also has freestanding columns that support a pediment.

  • So if I were to show you this, and not identify it and say to

  • you: "What kind of a building is this?"

  • I'm sure you would have said it was a temple;

  • and you would've been right in the sense that it looks most

  • like a temple.

  • But it is a tomb in the form of a temple, as you can well see

  • here.

  • Looking on the side of the monument, you can also see those

  • same features that I've just described.

  • And while we are looking at this view--

  • because I'm not going to bring it back--

  • I want to point out one detail that will loom large as we look

  • further at this structure.

  • You will see on the left side of the tomb that the architect

  • has created, has kind of scalloped out the

  • side on either side, creating niches,

  • tall niches on the side, and placed columns into that

  • space; which is a very unusual thing

  • to do.

  • It's not true on the other side of the monument,

  • only on this side of the structure.

  • Why has the architect done that?

  • I think it might have something to do with the siting,

  • perhaps how you viewed it from the street.

  • Maybe it was skewed in such a way that you would see not only

  • the façade but also the side,

  • and he wanted to emphasize the columns on that particular side

  • of the structure.

  • But it may also have just had to do with a quirk,

  • with a particular interest that the architect or the patron had

  • in doing something different than any other tomb,

  • and I want to return to that point in a moment.

  • But most significant of all is that in terms of the building

  • technique, the use of concrete faced with

  • exposed brick, this is exactly what we saw in

  • Ostia.

  • And you can see that just as in Ostia,

  • they have taken that brick as far as it can go,

  • in terms of its aesthetic value, by respecting the texture

  • of the brick, playing that texture off,

  • playing color, different colored bricks,

  • a reddish brick against a more yellowish colored brick,

  • playing those off against one another,

  • and then adding certain very highly decorative details like a

  • meander pattern, that we're going to see in a

  • moment, and decoration around the

  • windows of the tomb, done in stucco.

  • The columns, however, are marble;

  • the columns are marble, and in that sense again

  • something somewhat different than what we saw at Ostia.

  • This is a view of the tomb as it looks today.

  • The porch is not well preserved, and I can't show you

  • any of that.

  • But I can show you the rest of the structure,

  • and you can see it quite well in this particular view.

  • And again, you see that it is indeed well preserved.

  • Concrete construction, faced with brick,

  • the brick left exposed, respected and enjoyed,

  • in its own right.

  • What I've already described: the playing off of one color of

  • brick against another; this meander pattern done in

  • stucco; the stucco decoration,

  • very elaborate decoration, as we're going to see,

  • around the windows; tall podium,

  • we see that here as well.

  • An extraordinary structure.

  • And what's interesting I think to note,

  • at least culturally and in terms of social status,

  • is the fact that although this structure was put up for one of

  • the most wealthy men in-- or the wife of one of the most

  • wealthy men in Rome at this particular time,

  • the general aesthetic is very similar to what we saw for

  • professional people in the city of Ostia: that is,

  • a concrete tomb, in the form of a house,

  • or a temple in this case, that has as its facing brick,

  • and a respect for that brick in its own right.

  • Here are a couple of details.

  • I show you once again a detail of the warehouse or the Horrea

  • Epagathiana at Ostia that we looked at,

  • and also a detail of the Tomb of Annia Regilla in Rome.

  • And I think you can see here what I mean.

  • Again, the different coloration of brick, the yellowish brick,

  • the reddish brick, played off one against the

  • other; the use of stucco decoration,

  • in this case for the volutes of the composite capitals.

  • In this case--and in fact you'll remember I pointed out

  • what was interesting about these capitals at the warehouse was

  • that they were-- that the brick was used to make

  • up the main body of the capital.

  • And this is not one of them, but I also showed you one where

  • you could see the way in which that brick formed the actual

  • acanthus leaves of the capital, and then the volutes added in

  • stucco.

  • We see the same thing at the Tomb of Annia Regilla.

  • We see those--and here I think you can see it well --

  • the brick used to create the lower part of the acanthus

  • leaves, and then stucco added for the

  • curving part, and for some of the additional

  • decoration, the flower and so on up above.

  • And so we see--and here again very elaborate decoration around

  • the windows, which we also saw at the warehouse in Ostia.

  • Two more details of the Tomb of Annia Regilla.

  • Here you see what I was talking about before,

  • the way the architect has scooped out two areas on the

  • left side of the tomb, and placed the columns inside

  • of those, which is a unique--I don't know

  • of any other example of this in Roman architecture,

  • and it underscores, once again, that when it came

  • to tomb architecture, that the patron could pretty

  • much do whatever he wanted, as long as the architect could

  • build it.

  • It could be quite idiosyncratic as a form of architecture.

  • And we see not only has he scooped out these niches in

  • which to place the columns, but if you look at those

  • columns very carefully, and at the bases of those

  • columns, you will see that they are not round.

  • They are multi-sided, and the bases are also

  • multi-sided.

  • So doing something very unique in the context of this

  • particular tomb of Annia Regilla.

  • So two main points.

  • One, that there is clearly an aesthetic that is used for tomb

  • architecture, concrete faced with brick that

  • is used in the uppermost levels of Roman society,

  • and then further down in Roman society,

  • not only in Rome but also in Ostia.

  • But at the same time individuality,

  • eccentricity is valued in tomb architecture,

  • allowed in tomb architecture in a way that perhaps it isn't in

  • other forms of Roman architecture,

  • and we see it taken to its limit in this particular

  • building.

  • Just a few more details.

  • We see a niche from the Tomb of Annia Regilla.

  • We also see here both the meander pattern and this very

  • elaborate decoration around the windows;

  • a frame around the windows and then a projecting element up

  • above, with these great spiral volutes on either side;

  • very similar to the same sort of thing that was happening at

  • Ostia.

  • I remind you of the niche in the courtyard of the Horrea

  • Epagathiana, the warehouses at Ostia,

  • where you see the same sort of thing: these pilasters added in

  • stucco, the brickwork creating

  • triangles and lozenges, as you can see here.

  • Same idea over here, in the Tomb of Annia Regilla.

  • And if you look very closely at the pediment that is located

  • above the niche, from the tomb in Rome,

  • you see the projecting entablatures;

  • you see where the capitals would have been.

  • There would also have been probably columns added here,

  • on either side of the niche, making it look much more

  • similar to here.

  • But look closely at the pediment.

  • You will see that there is projecting entablature above

  • each column, but then in the center the

  • triangular pediment is cut back, and that playing around with

  • the traditional vocabulary of architecture is something that

  • I've noted is going to be a part of what we call the baroque

  • trend in Roman architecture.

  • I'm going to devote an entire lecture to the baroque trend in

  • Roman architecture, around the Empire,

  • not just in Rome, but mostly in the provinces.

  • And we'll see that same sort of thing, which creates a kind of

  • in-and-out lively movement to the façade that is part

  • of that approach.

  • The tomb itself again.

  • And just to point out, interestingly enough,

  • a couple of female figures with capitals on the top of their

  • head, or what look maybe more like

  • vases on the top of their head, but looking very much like

  • caryatids, like the caryatids that we saw

  • from the Erectheion in Athens, fifth century B.C.,

  • from the Forum of Augustus and from Hadrian's Villa around the

  • Serapeum.

  • They are not duplicates of those in Athens,

  • like the other two are, but they do seem to make

  • reference to them.

  • They're a bit more casual.

  • When I look at this pair, they always look to me like

  • they're kind of standing at a cocktail party together and

  • conversing with one another, using the usual gestures that

  • Italians are so famous for.

  • We see them doing that sort of thing here.

  • But they do seem to have that same pedigree,

  • going back to the whole idea of the caryatids.

  • And I only mention it to you, they were found right near this

  • tomb, and so it has been speculated,

  • although it is by no means certain,

  • that they might have belonged to the tomb.

  • They might have been located in front of the tomb,

  • or have been part of some kind of forecourt or fore space to

  • that tomb.

  • It's pure conjecture, but it would be interesting if

  • it were the case.

  • Because remember Herodes Atticus comes from Athens.

  • We see that the tomb is a thoroughly Roman tomb of the

  • second century A.D.

  • But it would be interesting to think that he might have added

  • some touches that might have made some reference for him,

  • and also especially for his wife whose tomb it was,

  • to the Athens of his birth.

  • With regard to tomb interiors in the second century A.D.

  • in Rome, there are two major types, and I want to treat both

  • of those today.

  • One of them is a type that we've seen before,

  • and that is where you stucco over the interior of the tomb;

  • you stucco it over, and then you add additional

  • stucco, in relief, to form the decoration,

  • and then you paint it.

  • That's one type.

  • And the second type, which might also use that for

  • the vault; but for the walls,

  • the second type is to use instead architectural members--

  • columns, pediments and the like--to enliven the wall and to

  • create a much more sculptural effect.

  • Both of these types are used in Rome, in the second century A.D.

  • in tomb architecture.

  • And I want to show you examples of both of them today.

  • The first, type 1, with stucco,

  • painted stucco, we see in the so-called Tomb of

  • the Valerii; the Tomb of the Valerii which

  • dates to around A.D.

  • 159, and is located on the Via Latina in Rome.

  • We haven't looked at the Via Latina before,

  • but it is one of Rome's main streets,

  • that had along it cemeteries, and there are a fair number of

  • concrete tombs, faced with brick,

  • that are preserved, very well preserved on the Via

  • Latina today.

  • And what makes them particularly special is the

  • interiors are almost pristine.

  • It's quite extraordinary to go into these and see how well they

  • have stood the test of time.

  • The Tomb of the Valerii, you see the lunette and the

  • vault of the interior of that tomb right here.

  • And as you look at the acanthus leaves growing up in the

  • lunette, all done in stucco relief,

  • and the barrel vault with its individual compartments,

  • round and square compartments, with floating figures inside,

  • you should certainly be reminded of things we've already

  • seen before.

  • When one looks at the acanthus leaves,

  • one can't help but think back to the delicate leaves of the

  • Ara Pacis, the delicate acanthus leaves of

  • the Ara Pacis Augustae, which you see on the left-hand

  • side of the screen.

  • And I'm sure you are as reminded as I am,

  • looking at this vault, by other things that we have

  • seen earlier this semester.

  • What's this over here?

  • The Domus Aurea; it's one of the vaults of the

  • Domus Aurea.

  • Third style; done, we believe,

  • by Fabullus himself.

  • And you'll recall, very delicate,

  • very light floral motifs; compartments,

  • in this case rectangular, with floating sea creatures in

  • the center.

  • We see exactly the same sort of thing here, although done in

  • stucco instead of paint.

  • But this was painted originally in antiquity,

  • and we see these floating, these Nereids on the back of

  • sea creatures inside, floating inside these.

  • And we think the message here, of course, is of the soul of

  • the deceased being carried to the Iles of the Blessed,

  • by these sea creatures.

  • So very much stucco decoration, second century A.D.,

  • but very dependent on Third Style Roman wall painting and

  • third style stucco decoration of earlier dates.

  • The Tomb of the Pancratii, in Rome, which dates to 169,

  • also on the Via Latina, has similarly well preserved

  • stucco decoration, also painted;

  • and I'll show you a color view in a moment, for you to get a

  • sense of that coloration.

  • But here you get an idea of the scheme of the wall:

  • very, very elaborate; stuccoed over;

  • stuccoed, much of the stucco is done in relief.

  • You can see it here.

  • If the stucco decoration of the Tomb of the Valerii made

  • reference to the Third Style, I think the inspiration here

  • was Fourth Style Roman wall painting and stucco decoration.

  • Because although you continue to see floating mythological

  • figures in these rectangular or triangular compartments,

  • if you look very closely, especially in this zone here,

  • you will also see these architectural cages,

  • done in stucco, very similar to the

  • architectural cages that we saw at the top of Fourth Style Roman

  • wall design.

  • So this taking its cue from Fourth Style Roman wall

  • painting.

  • And I have mentioned to you a couple of times already this

  • term that, in fact, most post-Pompeian

  • painting, and stucco decoration,

  • post-79 A.D., does seem to be inspired by the

  • third style, but even more so by the fourth

  • style of Roman wall painting, and we see that very well here,

  • with this stucco decorating the lunettes and also the vaulting.

  • Here's a view in color of the interior of the Tomb of the

  • Pancratii, where you can see the same sort

  • of scheme that I've already described,

  • but with the color.

  • And you can also see that we are dealing here with a

  • groin-vaulted interior.

  • And, what's interesting, is that sometimes the walls

  • have small niches for urns and the so-called arcosolia--

  • I've mentioned those to you before--

  • that were used for the placement of bodies,

  • once inhumation became as popular, indeed even more

  • popular, than cremation.

  • But we also sometimes see the sarcophagi themselves,

  • the freestanding coffins located in these tombs,

  • as we see here.

  • And it's interesting to keep in mind that all of the money and

  • time that was expended on this interior decoration--

  • keep in mind that very few people entered into these tombs.

  • When you looked at a tomb, you saw primarily its exterior.

  • Some family members, on special occasions,

  • might go inside, but it was relatively rare.

  • So all of this, all of this done,

  • in fact, to give the deceased a pleasant

  • home in perpetuity, and to help them on their

  • journey to the Isles of the Blessed.

  • This structure also has sea creatures depicted in it.

  • So travel is clearly also alluded to.

  • And scholars who have worked on this particular monument,

  • in particular, have noted that they think it

  • has to do with one of these secret mystery religions,

  • in this case the Orphic, O-r-p-h-i-c,

  • the Orphic religion that was practiced in secret initially

  • and then eventually came up above ground.

  • Two more details of the Pancratii ceilings,

  • in stucco.

  • These, I think, give you a particularly good

  • sense of the way in which they were built up almost as reliefs,

  • in some parts of these scenes -- this figure here,

  • for example.

  • Some of the rest was painted.

  • We see heraldic leopards over here, on either side of a vase.

  • The shell in the niche also done in stucco and raised in a

  • very sculptural way, and then the whole painted in a

  • variety of attractive maroons and blues and greens.

  • The most interesting tomb, from my point of view actually,

  • is a tomb that is located, a Roman tomb of the second

  • century that is located beneath the Vatican today.

  • And I show you a view again of the dome of St.

  • Peter's Cathedral in Rome, designed by Michelangelo

  • himself.

  • Another view over here showing also Michelangelo's dome,

  • but showing below it the so-called Baldacchino that was

  • put up by the famous seventeenth-century Italian

  • architect, Borromini, Francesco Borromini

  • , the Cathedral of St.

  • Peter's.

  • And any of you who've been there will agree with me on

  • this, it's one of the great wonders of the world;

  • there's no question it is.

  • If you want to talk about bigger is better,

  • or biggest is best, this is a truly colossal

  • building, as any of you who have been there know.

  • But it does give me occasion to mention,

  • as I've mentioned a couple of times already this term,

  • that one of the really great things to do when you visit Rome

  • is to climb things, is to climb.

  • If you're so lucky to climb the Column of Trajan,

  • or the Pantheon, up to the dome--those you have

  • to get special permission to do.

  • But what you don't need special permission to do,

  • and is one of the great climbs in Rome, is to go up St.

  • Peter's.

  • And you can go up St.

  • Peter's either on the outside of the building,

  • to various levels from which you can see some of the greatest

  • views of Rome, including back over central

  • Rome, ancient Rome, all the buildings that we've

  • been talking about.

  • You can see the dome of the Pantheon from the top of St.

  • Peter's.

  • You can see the Victor Emmanuel Monument, tall and proud,

  • from the dome of St.

  • Peter's.

  • But you can also climb up to the dome, from the inside,

  • which is another extraordinary experience.

  • You can go almost--not quite but almost--to the apex of

  • Michelangelo's dome, walk around a corridor there,

  • and look down on Bernini's Baldacchino.

  • So for those of you who are going to Rome anytime soon,

  • or in the future, it's a not to be missed

  • experience to climb the Cathedral of St.

  • Peter's, on the outside, and also on the inside.

  • I bring you to St.

  • Peter's because one can also go down underneath St.

  • Peter's.

  • And that's another very interesting experience,

  • to go down in the depths, beneath St.

  • Peter's and get a really great sense of the centuries of

  • civilization that have been piled one on top of another,

  • from ancient Rome, or from the time of Romulus,

  • indeed all the way up to today.

  • And in order to see the Tomb of the Caetennii,

  • which is the tomb that I want to turn to now,

  • you do have to go down underneath St.

  • Peter's.

  • You have to--this is something you can't just walk it.

  • You can climb St.

  • Peter's any day of the week, but if you want to go

  • underneath St.

  • Peter's, you have to make special arrangements.

  • You have to get special tickets to do that.

  • And now one can do that online; you can plan that online and

  • you can get tickets to go to the so-called Vatican cemeteries

  • underneath.

  • And they don't have them--they have a small number of hours,

  • on a variety of days.

  • So it is something one needs to plan for well in advance.

  • But you can do it.

  • You go to the left of the Baldacchino, you go down,

  • and you go down century upon century.

  • You see primarily the tombs of the popes, the crypts with the

  • tombs of the popes.

  • And I show you Pope Boniface here, just to give you an idea

  • of what some of these look like, lying in eternity here on the

  • top of his sarcophagus, or a sculptured portrait of him

  • on the top of his sarcophagus.

  • But if you go all the way down, all the way down--

  • and most tourists don't do this--but if you go all the way

  • to the bottom, what you end up with is one of

  • Rome's great tomb streets.

  • And this tomb street was out in the light of day,

  • of course, in antiquity, like all the other tomb

  • streets, but because of the passage of

  • time, because other buildings that

  • were built on top, primarily the Cathedral of St.

  • Peter's, and just the rising ground level over time,

  • it now is subterranean.

  • But when you--it's amazing.

  • You go down, you walk along it,

  • it is like you are--it's a dark street, but nonetheless--I

  • wouldn't want to record in that street.

  • But you go down under.

  • It's a dark street but it is--you feel like you are

  • walking along a major tomb street in Rome;

  • and indeed you are.

  • And I show you a plan of it here, so that you can see.

  • It is very much like walking along the tomb street in Isola

  • Sacra.

  • You see at your left and right these concrete,

  • brick-faced tombs, that look very much like the

  • Tomb of Annia Regilla, or the ones that we saw in

  • Isola Sacra: typical house tombs of the second century A.D.

  • One of the tombs that is located down there has long been

  • thought by scholars, and believers,

  • to be the Tomb of St.

  • Peter.

  • No one has been able to prove this incontrovertibly,

  • but there is some interesting evidence, both pro and con.

  • And it has been thought--and you know Peter's famous

  • statement, Upon this rock I shall build this church,

  • namely the Church of St.

  • Peter's.

  • We believe that when Constantine, the last pagan

  • emperor-- and we're going to talk about

  • him in the last lecture this semester--

  • when Constantine built the first basilica,

  • Christian basilica on this site, the basilica that we refer

  • to as Old St.

  • Peter's, that obviously predated New St.

  • Peter's, we think he may have built it on that very rock and

  • on that very tomb of St.

  • Peter.

  • And that's what this restored view shows you here.

  • If you walk along though and look at these tombs,

  • for the most part they look like typical Roman tombs from

  • the second century: brick-faced concrete

  • construction, with interesting decoration

  • inside.

  • And I show you just the most famous mosaic that is located

  • down there, which you see is a figure in a chariot.

  • We think it's a representation of the Sun God Sol or Helios,

  • in the chariot, because you can see the rayed

  • crown.

  • But some believe it is a representation of Christ as

  • Helios.

  • And I show it to you only because it is the single most

  • famous mosaic down there, and one of the most famous

  • mosaics in Rome, but also because it heralds

  • what we're going to begin to see happening,

  • especially in the last lecture, and that is this transition

  • from paganism to Christianity in Rome--

  • Constantine being the last pagan, first Christian emperor--

  • and this interesting way in which pagan imagery elides into

  • Christian imagery, both in terms of figural

  • decoration, but also in terms of

  • architecture.

  • I can't, because it's so poorly lighted down there,

  • I can't show you a good picture of the tombs beneath St.

  • Peter's.

  • But I can show you another set of tombs beneath a--

  • that are very well lighted and can be photographed better--

  • beneath a columbarium, an underground--

  • a catacomb actually, an underground burial area that

  • was used by the early Christians in Rome.

  • And you see it's called--you don't have to worry about

  • this--it's called the Church of San Sebastiano,

  • and these tombs are underneath that.

  • But I show them to you here, just to give you a sense of

  • what that tomb street looked like,

  • underneath the Vatican, or looks like underneath the

  • Vatican, with the concrete brick-faced

  • tombs, looking very similar to those

  • we saw at Isola Sacra.

  • The same travertine door jambs, inscriptions,

  • slit windows.

  • And if you look through the entranceway of this one,

  • you will see it's barrel vaulted, and it has a scheme

  • that is very similar to the stucco decoration of the Tomb of

  • the Valerii, with these circles done in

  • raised stucco and with the floating figures in between

  • them.

  • And this is exactly what it looks like beneath the Vatican.

  • I can show you some views of the interiors of some of the

  • Vatican tombs, because those have lights in

  • them; they're better lighted.

  • You can see them here.

  • We see this interesting combination,

  • that we also saw at Isola Sacra, of the smaller niches

  • that are used for urns, and the larger arcosolia

  • that are used for the placement of bodies.

  • And then you can see, in this view on the right,

  • the way in which they have closed off those

  • arcosolia by placing marble plaques on them that

  • either have inscriptions or sometimes figural scenes,

  • and then again here a freestanding sarcophagi on these

  • interiors as well.

  • This is an axonometric view from Ward-Perkins of the Tomb of

  • the Caetennii.

  • It dates to 160 A.D., in the Vatican Cemetery in

  • Rome.

  • And I think you can see here both the brick-faced concrete

  • construction, the way in which the windows

  • have similar stucco decoration to what we saw on the Tomb of

  • Annia Regilla, on the Via Appia in Rome.

  • But most interesting for us is the way in which the interior is

  • treated, because this is my type 2.

  • Here we will see some stucco, but you will see here that the

  • walls are enlivened in a different way.

  • They are enlivened through architectonic means,

  • through the use of columns, through the use of niches,

  • through the use of pediments, triangular pediments,

  • but also broken triangular pediments.

  • Here you see a pediment that has been split apart,

  • a triangular pediment split apart to show what is inside.

  • This is the same scheme that we saw in Second Style Roman wall

  • painting, way back when; this whole idea of taking the

  • traditional vocabulary of architecture and dealing with it

  • in a very different way than had been done before --

  • breaking the rules so to speak.

  • We see that happening here.

  • But the main thing is that we're looking at this designer

  • using architectural members to create the visual interest of

  • the walls of the structure.

  • You can also see in this axonometric view this

  • combination of small niches for cinerary urns,

  • and then these larger arcosolia for the bodies.

  • So cremation and inhumation still going on hand in hand,

  • during the second century A.D.

  • This is a spectacular view of the interior of the Tomb of the

  • Caetennii, and here you can really see what I mean.

  • Yes, there is some stucco.

  • If you look at the vaults you will see that those--

  • this is again a groin vault that has been stuccoed over,

  • and it had the same kind of compartments and painted

  • decoration, relief decoration,

  • that we saw in the Tomb of the Pancratii.

  • But you can see that most of the effects have been done

  • through architectural means.

  • If you look carefully you will see that there is a

  • black-and-white mosaic on the floor;

  • not so different from what we see in Ostia.

  • There are niches on the walls, these niches used for cinerary

  • urns; arcosolia down here for

  • the bodies.

  • And there are stuccoed decoration and the use of the

  • shells that you can see here.

  • But if you look very carefully at the combination of sort of

  • maroon and cherry red walls, you will see the remains of the

  • architectural members that served to enliven this space.

  • Look up here; you will see that there was a

  • triangular pediment over the central niche.

  • You can see parts of the broken triangular pediments on either

  • side.

  • You can see the remains of capitals, and beneath those

  • would have been the projecting columns that we saw in the

  • axonometric view in Ward-Perkins.

  • So this again the second type, where the walls are enlivened

  • with architectural members, and those architectural

  • members, when intact, would have created a scheme in

  • which you had progression, recession, progression,

  • recession, all along the wall --

  • this in and out scheme that we're going to see becomes the

  • hallmark of what I'm going to term here this semester the

  • baroque element in Roman antiquity,

  • in Roman architecture.

  • All of these buildings were being put up during the reign of

  • Hadrian's successor.

  • Hadrian had died in 138 A.D., and he was succeeded by a man

  • by the name of Antoninus Pius, whose portrait you see here on

  • the upper right.

  • Antoninus Pius again was--he reigned for a quite long time.

  • He reigned between 138 and 161 A.D.

  • It was a period of extraordinary peace.

  • He, like Hadrian, was a peace loving man,

  • and he was able to maintain that peace exceedingly well,

  • and Rome really thrived under his emperorship.

  • He's also interesting because he seems to have had more of a

  • love relationship with his wife than any other Roman emperor

  • that I can think of, a relationship that was so

  • strong that when his wife died-- he became emperor--here's his

  • wife, Faustina the Elder.

  • He became emperor in 138, but she died already in 141,

  • and as I mentioned he stayed emperor until 161;

  • so he was emperor for twenty more years after her death.

  • He never forgot her.

  • He stayed completely enamored of her.

  • He never remarried.

  • We don't even have any rumors that he had any concubines or

  • anything like that.

  • He seems to have stayed completely true to her.

  • And what's interesting is that when the two of them died,

  • their successors, Marcus Aurelius and Lucius

  • Verus, put up a monument to them.

  • And it's not on your Monument List and I'm not holding you

  • responsible for it, but I just want to show it to

  • you, because it will illuminate a monument that I am going to

  • show you in a moment.

  • This base, which served as the base for a porphyry column,

  • that was located on top, represents a scene in which we

  • see Antoninus Pius and his wife, Faustina the Elder,

  • being carried to heaven on the back of a male personification.

  • We see Roma, in the bottom right,

  • and she is saluting them; she is bearing witness to what

  • is a representation of their joint divinization.

  • The two of them, Faustina the Elder,

  • divinized at her death in 141; Antoninus Pius divinized at his

  • death in 161.

  • And yet we see them being carried to heaven as if their

  • divinizations happened exactly at the same time.

  • This is obviously a fiction.

  • It is a conflation of time.

  • It is a fiction of which the Romans were particularly adept

  • in their sculptural representations.

  • But I show it to you here because it has some bearing on a

  • temple that I now want to talk about.

  • This is the so-called Temple of Antoninus Pius and Faustina the

  • Elder.

  • It is a temple that Antoninus Pius put up in honor of his wife

  • in 141, to her as a diva, after she was divinized.

  • But at his own death, twenty years later,

  • in 161, his successors--again, Marcus Aurelius and Lucius

  • Verus-- rededicated it to the two of

  • them, to the divine Antoninus Pius and to the divine Faustina.

  • It is quite well preserved today, and it is important for

  • two main reasons.

  • It is important because it is our best surviving temple that

  • was put up to an emperor and an empress.

  • It wasn't the only one, but it's the best surviving

  • example of that.

  • And it is another example of the way in which antiquities are

  • reused over time, in other contexts and at later

  • times, and how that reuse sometimes

  • helps to preserve them.

  • What I show you now on the screen is a coin,

  • on the upper left, representing Faustina the Elder

  • on the obverse of the coin, on the left,

  • her portrait, and it refers to her as

  • "Diva Faustina."

  • So it is a coin that Antoninus Pius struck after her death and

  • after her divinization.

  • And we see on the back the temple that Antoninus Pius

  • originally made, in her honor.

  • Over here we see a series of drawings,

  • that come from the Ward-Perkins textbook,

  • that show once again a depiction of that original

  • temple on the coin, and with a legend that says

  • aeternitas, for eternity,

  • because now she is a diva for eternity.

  • And then a restored view, over here, of what the temple

  • would've looked like after it was rededicated to Antoninus and

  • Faustina, in 161.

  • And then over here, the Baroque building that was

  • built into it, in the seventeenth century

  • A.D., when it was turned into the Church of San Lorenzo in

  • Miranda, and I've put the name San

  • Lorenzo in Miranda on your Monument List.

  • If we look at the view of it, as it was after it was

  • re-dedicated to Antoninus Pius and Faustina,

  • we will see a typical Roman temple.

  • All the features that we have described so very often in the

  • course of this semester--the deep porch;

  • the freestanding columns in the porch;

  • the very tall podium; the single staircase;

  • the façade emphasis--we see all of that here.

  • A very conventional Roman temple, with sculpture in the

  • pediment and decoration on the eaves of the temple as well.

  • What we see on the bottom left is what happened to this temple

  • in the seventeenth century.

  • Part of it was preserved--maybe more of it was preserved,

  • we're not absolutely sure--but at least part of it was

  • preserved.

  • The walls, the sidewalls, and also the columns and the

  • front of the-- well the sidewalls primarily,

  • and the columns, and the lintel over here that

  • has the inscription that dedicates the temple to

  • Antoninus Pius and Faustina.

  • But what you see behind it is the Baroque façade rising

  • up, a Baroque façade that

  • has buttresses-- and I'm going to show it to you

  • in actuality in a moment-- that has buttresses on either

  • side, that has this wonderful split,

  • arcuated pediment-- a split, arcuated pediment that

  • would've been impossible to conceive,

  • I believe, without these architects,

  • Baroque architects of seventeenth century,

  • looking back to the baroque element in Roman antiquity.

  • The cross is added in the center, of course.

  • But there's one major difference between this building

  • and this building.

  • Does anyone see what that is, besides the addition of the

  • Baroque façade?

  • Student: Podium.

  • Prof: What?

  • A little louder.

  • Student: The podium.

  • Prof: The podium, exactly.

  • The podium is not there.

  • The podium is not there.

  • The staircase is not there.

  • Why is that?

  • Student: I don't know if it's because like the land is

  • filling.

  • Prof: Yes.

  • Student: >

  • Prof: Yes, the ground level has risen,

  • so that at the time that they decide to turn the Temple of

  • Antoninus Pius and Faustina into San Lorenzo in Miranda--

  • this is where the ground level is.

  • There's no podium anymore.

  • The podium is completely underground, as are part of the

  • columns; we see only the part of the--so

  • they put the door at the bottom, what is the bottom at that

  • particular time.

  • Now let me show you the building today.

  • It's very well preserved.

  • So you see what I mean by the best-preserved monument to--the

  • best-preserved temple to an emperor and an empress in Rome:

  • extremely well preserved.

  • You see its location is in the Roman Forum, with the backdrop

  • of the Imperial Fora behind it: the Forum of Augustus,

  • the Forum of Trajan.

  • In the Roman Forum.

  • So prime real estate for this temple, when Antoninus Pius

  • decides to build it to his wife.

  • We see here the original podium, the original staircase,

  • the original columns: grey granite columns,

  • white marble capitals.

  • We see the original lintel with the inscription still preserved:

  • To Divine Antoninus Pius, to Divine Faustina.

  • We see the original tufa walls of the side.

  • We see the lintel on this side that also has a frieze that is

  • preserved from antiquity.

  • And then we see, growing up behind it,

  • the seventeenth-century Baroque church, with its buttresses and

  • with its broken arcuated pediment.

  • And if you look very carefully, you will see this was ground

  • level, in the seventeenth century.

  • This is the seventeenth-century door.

  • This is the ancient door down here.

  • I'll show you a couple of views where you can see that even more

  • clearly.

  • Here's another view showing you those grey granite columns,

  • the white capitals, the seventeenth-century door.

  • And then down here the ancient door,

  • which shows you more dramatically than anything else

  • I've been able to show you this semester,

  • this change in ground level.

  • And two more views that I took that show you the same here,

  • the seventeenth-century door.

  • So you have to think of all of this underground in the

  • seventeenth century, and then only in more modern

  • times was the temple excavated, temple and church excavated

  • down to their original level.

  • Here's another view showing you again the seventeenth-century

  • doorway, the earlier doorway, the staircase.

  • A little baby down here, which I was happy to have for

  • scale.

  • It gives you a sense once again of how--and that makes it even

  • more dramatic, because--I don't know if it's a

  • he or a she; she, she, sitting there,

  • that she--it makes it even more dramatic to demonstrate to you

  • again, since this is a lecture on

  • bigger is better, that this Temple to Antoninus

  • and Faustina was also very, very--also is very,

  • very large in scale.

  • When Antoninus Pius died, in 161, he was succeeded by

  • Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus;

  • Marcus Aurelius, one of the most famous of the

  • Roman emperors, the great stoic philosopher,

  • and you see him in a portrait here.

  • You see Lucius Verus on the left-hand side.

  • The two of them were co-emperors between 161 and 169.

  • Lucius Verus died in battle in 169.

  • Marcus Aurelius continued on alone, until the year 180 A.D.

  • So he too had a very long reign.

  • Marcus spent most of his reign, however, on the front.

  • During the period that he was emperor, the barbarians were

  • literally at the gates.

  • There was concern that they were going to,

  • in fact, overrun the city completely,

  • overrun the Empire completely, and he had to spend most of his

  • reign on the frontiers, and he did, beating back those

  • barbarians.

  • For that reason, there was very little

  • architectural construction.

  • Even though he had a very long reign,

  • there was very little architectural construction

  • during the time of Marcus Aurelius,

  • because of the time that he had to spend in war.

  • He was succeeded by his son, Commodus, whose portrait you

  • see down here; Commodus in the line,

  • also in the megalomaniacal line of Nero and Domitian:

  • a man who saw himself as a god on earth,

  • who saw himself as the Greek hero Hercules.

  • He called himself Hercules Romanus.

  • And we see him in his most famous and most fabulous--this

  • is about one of the best portraits preserved from ancient

  • Rome.

  • It's in the Capitoline Museums today,

  • and you see him masquerading here as Hercules,

  • with the lion's skin around his head,

  • holding the club, holding the apples of the

  • Hesperides, demonstrating that he has

  • completed that last labor, just as Hercules had done,

  • and is going to become a god in the manner of Hercules.

  • He used to parade around in Rome openly in this way,

  • and actually struck coins showing himself as Hercules

  • Romanus, just to give you a sense of how

  • extreme it was.

  • And he was always challenging people to hand-to-hand combat.

  • And, in fact, he eventually got his

  • comeuppance because although he himself also reigned for quite

  • awhile, between 180 and 192--so he

  • lasted for twelve years-- but nonetheless even his

  • closest advisors eventually turned against him and plotted

  • behind his back and arranged for one of the most famous

  • gladiators of the day, Narcissus, interestingly called

  • Narcissus, to take up Commodus' offer to

  • fight anybody who wanted to fight him in the Colosseum.

  • And, of course, he thought that being emperor

  • protected him, and that he,

  • like Nero, who fixed the Olympic Games in his favor,

  • that Commodus would also never lose in a contest like this,

  • because he was by definition emperor.

  • But his advisors turned against him, let Narcissus loose,

  • and Commodus was slain by Narcissus in the Colosseum.

  • But he did--I do want to just mention,

  • and only in passing--Commodus did put up a column to his

  • father, Marcus Aurelius,

  • that is based very closely on the Column of Trajan in Rome.

  • I'm not going to go into it with you today,

  • because the architectural complex in which it was

  • originally found no longer survives.

  • But I just wanted you to be aware that the Column of Trajan

  • was succeeded by the Column of Marcus Aurelius.

  • I want to however turn, for the rest of the lecture,

  • to a new dynasty that came to the fore after the end of the

  • so-called Antonine emperors.

  • When Commodus died, there were no more Antonines to

  • succeed him, and Rome once again fell into a

  • civil war, and there were rivals warring

  • with one another for supreme power.

  • And the man who came to the fore was a man by the name of

  • Pertinax, P-e-r-t-i-n-a-x.

  • But he had other rivals, and one of them was the man who

  • eventually really came out on top, and his name was Lucius

  • Septimius Severus.

  • Lucius Septimius Severus was within that year,

  • between 92 and 93 , able to get rid of not only

  • Pertinax but other rivals, and become supreme ruler of

  • Rome.

  • And because he, like Vespasian before him,

  • had two sons to succeed him, Caracalla and Geta,

  • he was able to set up a new dynasty,

  • the so-called Severan, what we call the Severan,

  • S-e-v-e-r-a-n, the Severan dynasty in Rome.

  • The Severan dynasty in Rome, extremely important,

  • because Septimius Severus commissioned some important

  • structures, both public structures and

  • private; he was an interesting emperor

  • because he combined an interest in the two.

  • And then his son, Caracalla, who epitomizes,

  • as I began today, the whole bigger is better,

  • or biggest is best philosophy, in life and in architecture.

  • I want to show you first, just to introduce you to these

  • two patrons, this wonderful painted tondo that is preserved

  • from Rome.

  • It was found--excuse me, not in Rome but in Egypt,

  • and is now in a museum in Berlin.

  • But it is important because it is our only surviving painting

  • of an emperor, and not only an emperor but an

  • emperor and his whole family, his wife and his children;

  • the only surviving painting of an emperor today.

  • But there were obviously many of these in antiquity.

  • It's a fascinating painting.

  • We see Septimius Severus with his grey hair and beard,

  • and his wonderful jeweled crown.

  • We see his wife, Julia Domna,

  • who--and by the way, I neglected to mention,

  • but one of the interesting things about Septimius Severus'

  • biography is the fact that he was born not in Rome,

  • and not in Spain, as Trajan and Hadrian had been,

  • but rather in North Africa, in a place called Leptis Magna,

  • L-e-p-t-i-s, new word, M-a-g-n-a,

  • in Leptis Magna, born in North Africa.

  • He hooked up with a woman from Syria, whose name was Julia

  • Domna.

  • She was the daughter of an important priest in Syria called

  • Bassianus.

  • She was famous in Rome for her wigs;

  • she used to wear wigs, and you can see her wearing one

  • of her wigs in this wonderful painted portrait.

  • She also clearly liked jewelry, because you can see her with

  • these fabulous triple pearl earrings and a wonderful pearl

  • necklace here also, looking very vibrant in this

  • portrait.

  • And then the two of them with their sons;

  • their elder son, Caracalla over her,

  • and their younger son, or what remains of him,

  • Geta, on the left.

  • Geta and Caracalla succeeded their father together,

  • as co-rulers.

  • But Caracalla, very jealous of his brother,

  • who was much more popular with the Roman populace than

  • Caracalla himself was.

  • And Caracalla eventually had his brother murdered,

  • and after his brother was murdered,

  • he convinced--that is, Caracalla--convinced the Roman

  • Senate to issue a damnatio memoriae,

  • or a damnation of the memory of Geta,

  • and an attempt was made to eradicate Geta from history by

  • eradicating him from art.

  • And you can see that he was snuffed out;

  • his face was removed on this.

  • But then it was left to stand, to show the power that

  • Caracalla had to destroy his brother, as you can see here.

  • This gives you a glimpse into the mind and psyche of

  • Caracalla.

  • I want to show you first though two buildings;

  • before we look at the Baths of Caracalla,

  • I do want to show you two buildings of Septimius Severus:

  • a public building first, the so-called Arch of Septimius

  • Severus in the Roman Forum, and then an extension to the

  • Palatine Palace.

  • The Arch of Septimius Severus in the Roman Forum dates to A.D.

  • 203, and it commemorates the Parthian victory of Septimius

  • Severus.

  • Septimius Severus, I already mentioned to you,

  • came to power in a civil war.

  • So like Augustus, and like Vespasian before him,

  • he needed to gain legitimacy by having an important foreign

  • victory, and he does this by looking

  • East, as Augustus had done before him,

  • looking to Parthia, and does war with Parthia,

  • and in fact has an important victory,

  • and celebrates that important victory in this triumphal arch

  • that is put up in his honor in 203 A.D.,

  • in once again the choicest spot of real estate in Rome,

  • the Forum Romanum, the Roman Forum.

  • I show you a Google Earth view over here.

  • We've seen this one before, so you've undoubtedly got this

  • one memorized by now, this Google Earth image of the

  • Roman Forum as it looks today, with the Colosseum up there,

  • with the Via dei Fori Imperiali,

  • Imperial Fora, over here, the Circus Maximus,

  • the Palatine Hill, the Campidoglio,

  • Capitoline Hill as redesigned by Michelangelo,

  • the wedding cake of Victor Emmanuel here,

  • between the Campidoglio and the Colosseum.

  • We see, of course, the remains of the ancient

  • Roman Forum -- much lower ground level than the modern ground

  • level.

  • You'll recall the location of the Temple of Venus and Roma,

  • just underneath the Colosseum.

  • The Arch of Titus on the Velia.

  • And you should remember also that we talked,

  • way in the beginning of the term, about two arches,

  • two successive arches, built in honor of Augustus:

  • first his Actian victory, victory in Actium,

  • and then his victory over the Parthians,

  • which is over here.

  • And then if we look very close--it's a little hard to see

  • when I'm up this close-- but we look very closely,

  • we will see the location-- I think it's roughly around

  • here--of the Arch of Septimius Severus.

  • We can see it better in this plan of the Roman Forum as it

  • developed between the third and seventh centuries A.D.

  • We see the Tabularium at the top, which means we're close to

  • the Capitoline Hill.

  • We see two basilicas that were put up in the Republican period.

  • We see a temple that we did not study, that was put up in honor

  • of the divine Julius Caesar, by Augustus.

  • We see the Speaker's Platform.

  • We see the Senate House, which I will show you in a

  • later lecture.

  • And over here we see the location of what was originally

  • the Actian Arch of Augustus, and then the Parthian Arch of

  • Augustus.

  • And remember that the Parthian Arch of Augustus had a triple

  • opening.

  • And then if you look at the rest of the plan,

  • you will see the location of the Arch of Septimius Severus,

  • over there, diagonally across, in dialogue,

  • with the Parthian Arch of Augustus.

  • Was this coincidence?

  • Absolutely not.

  • This was clearly very carefully orchestrated by Septimius

  • Severus and his advisors to build his Parthian Arch in

  • dialogue with the Parthian Arch of Augustus.

  • With regard to its form, it also made reference to the

  • Augustan arch.

  • I show you here the Arch of Septimius Severus as it looks

  • today.

  • It is our first example that we've seen this semester of a

  • Roman arch with a triple arcuated opening:

  • a large arcuated opening in the center,

  • flanked by two smaller, lower arcuated entrances.

  • We have not seen that before -- first surviving example in Rome.

  • We remember, if we think back to the arches

  • we have explored, from the time of Augustus on,

  • you'll remember that they are single-bayed arches.

  • Augustus' Actian arch, the Arch of Titus,

  • and even the second-century Arch of Trajan at Benevento.

  • But, as I've already said today, if we look back to the

  • coin-- the arch no longer exists--but

  • we look back to a coin depiction of the Parthian Arch of

  • Augustus, it had three openings:

  • a central arcuated opening and then two rectangular openings,

  • trabeated openings, with pediments on either side,

  • flanking it.

  • So this is not--the Parthian arch of Augustus is not a triple

  • arcuated arch, but it is a three opening arch.

  • And I think there is no question that those three

  • openings are being alluded to in the Severan arch,

  • and being transformed into something that was new,

  • which was the idea of the triple-arcuated bay.

  • Or maybe it wasn't so new, because there's an arch--

  • the arch that you see down here--in the south of France,

  • at Orange -- and we'll look at this arch when we make our

  • journey to the south of France; in an upcoming lecture we will

  • look at this arch.

  • And it's a triple-bayed arch, just like the Arch of Septimius

  • Severus.

  • It's covered with sculpture, just like the Arch of Septimius

  • Severus.

  • So for a while there were scholars who dated this to the

  • time of Septimius Severus, although put up in the

  • provinces.

  • But recent scholarship, more recent scholarship,

  • has demonstrated--scholars have looked at the piles of arms and

  • armor on here, and identified it as piles of

  • arms and armor that had to do with battles that took place in

  • the south of France, or what is now the south of

  • France, in the age of Augustus.

  • There's also an inscription referring to a specific

  • historical figure who lived during the time,

  • the late period of Augustus, and into the time of Tiberius.

  • So it seems very likely that this is not a Severan arch but a

  • Tiberian arch.

  • And I show it to you here only because while we usually--

  • and this may be helpful to some of you who are doing paper

  • topics or city plans in the provinces--

  • we usually think of ideas flowing from the center to the

  • periphery.

  • But here we seem to have an idea that comes to the fore

  • first in the periphery, and then ends up ultimately in

  • the center; although, of course,

  • there are lots of missing pieces to the ancient puzzle.

  • There are lots of monuments that have not come down to us.

  • So it is not inconceivable that a triple-bayed arch was built in

  • Rome earlier, but we just have no evidence

  • for it.

  • I want to show you the arch itself very quickly,

  • because it's mainly a work of sculpture.

  • But just to show you the three bays.

  • Victories in the spandles; river gods down here;

  • inscription at the top.

  • You'll have to imagine the great bronze quadriga of the

  • emperor at the apex.

  • Decorated bases down here.

  • But most interesting are the panels that we see,

  • four panels that we see, two on either side of the arch.

  • And I show you a detail, a very good detail,

  • of one of them here; although it's weathered,

  • you can see it quite well.

  • You can see that this panel, instead of having full-length

  • figures standing on a single ground line,

  • as we saw, for example, in the frieze of the Ara Pacis,

  • we see figures on a number of tiers here,

  • small figures on a number of tiers.

  • It should remind you of the scenes on the Column of Trajan,

  • those spiral, the spiral frieze,

  • with the individual figures telling the story of war,

  • and in this case the Parthian War of Septimius Severus.

  • And so what I think happened here--

  • my theory, and there are others who've said the same--

  • is that what happened here is that the designer of this got

  • the idea to take excerpts, in a sense, from the Columns of

  • Trajan, or the Column of Marcus

  • Aurelius, and put them in panel format,

  • on this monument.

  • I don't know whether--you can think to yourselves whether you

  • think this is successful or not.

  • I think it probably was not deemed to be particularly

  • successful, because it is the only arch design of its type.

  • No one picked up afterwards and imitated this particular idea.

  • The bases down below representing Romans,

  • bringing back Parthian prisoners.

  • I want to speak very briefly also about Septimius Severus'

  • extension of the Imperial Palace on the Palatine Hill.

  • He extended it to the south.

  • He lived there, just like every emperor since

  • Domitian.

  • He extended it on the southern side--

  • that's the side nearest the forum--and he added a

  • façade to it, a very elaborate façade

  • that does not survive.

  • It doesn't survive because we know it was torn down in 1588 to

  • 1589 by one of the popes, because the pope wanted to use

  • it in his own papal building; wanted to use the building

  • materials in his own papal building.

  • But fortunately the artist, Marten van Heemskerck,

  • the Renaissance artist--and I've put his name on the

  • Monument List for you-- Marten van Heemskerck drew some

  • of it while it was being dismantled.

  • And you see a piece of it over here in the Marten Van

  • Heemskerck drawing.

  • There's also the plan of the structure, also preserved on the

  • Forma Urbis, and we can see that marble plan of Rome from the

  • Severan period.

  • If we take both of those--that evidence together,

  • we can reconstruct it quite effectively.

  • We can see that it was a façade that looked very

  • much like a theater, with wings on either side,

  • with apses here, three large apses,

  • and columns inside those apses, with other elements that have

  • columns in three tiers: looking very much like a

  • theater stage set, all done in marble.

  • It might have been also a fountain.

  • There might have been a basin down here with a water display.

  • All of this serving as a new façade for Domitian's

  • Palace on the Palatine Hill.

  • It's important because it's another example of this use of

  • progression, recession, progression,

  • recession, across the façade,

  • to give an in-and-out, undulating movement,

  • using the traditional vocabulary of architecture in a

  • way that is striking and in a way that again heralds this new

  • baroque style in Roman architecture.

  • I also mention, just as the last point about

  • this monument, that we also--the reason it's

  • called the Septizodium or the Septizonium--

  • and you see that name on the Monument List for you--

  • the reason it's referred to as the Septizodium is because it

  • was thought to honor the-- or to commemorate the seven

  • planets, which is not surprising in the

  • orbits of Septimius Severus and Julia Domna,

  • because we know that Julia Domna was an avid follower of

  • astrological signs, used to predict what was going

  • to happen in her husband's reign,

  • through those signs, and this is likely a nod to her

  • particular astrological interests.

  • In the nine or ten minutes that remain,

  • I want to end today with this extraordinary imperial bath

  • structure that was designed at the behest of the emperor

  • Caracalla.

  • When Septimius Severus died in 211, he was succeeded by

  • Caracalla and by Geta.

  • I've already told you what Caracalla did to get rid of

  • Geta, and Caracalla became sole

  • emperor in 212 A.D., and remained emperor until his

  • death in 217 A.D.

  • And one of his major commissions was this imperial

  • bath structure.

  • He wanted to ape his father, because we know that Septimius

  • Severus had also built a major public bath in Rome,

  • the Thermae Septimianae.

  • They do not survive.

  • We have very little knowledge of them, so there isn't anything

  • that I can show you or tell you about them.

  • But we know he built it.

  • So like father like son.

  • He wanted to outdo his father--this is like Bush One,

  • Bush Two--wanted to outdo his father, and to build an even

  • larger bathing establishment.

  • And he does it here, in Rome, a bathing

  • establishment called the Baths of Caracalla,

  • or the Thermae Antoninianae.

  • Baths of Caracalla: dates to 212 to 216 A.D.

  • Any of you who have seen it will agree with me this is one--

  • if we had, if Trajan's Forum was the mother of all forums,

  • this is certainly the mother of all imperial bath structures.

  • This is quite something.

  • Fortunately, much of it survives,

  • mainly the concrete shell, a concrete shell of itself.

  • But we can see the outlines here in this Google Earth image,

  • which shows you not only the bathing block,

  • but also part of the precinct that surrounded it.

  • Because we shall see, if we look at a plan of the

  • Baths of Caracalla-- which you see here in the

  • bottom left-- this is a detail of just the

  • bathing block, and if we compare the general

  • plan with the plan of the Baths of Trajan in Rome,

  • we will see that the Baths of Trajan,

  • which were very large in their own day,

  • have been exceeded here in terms of size,

  • but are very much in the same general format.

  • By that I mean a large bathing block here, inside a larger

  • precinct.

  • That precinct has around it a host of rooms that were used as

  • lecture halls and seminar rooms and Greek and Latin libraries.

  • So a great locus of intellectual,

  • as well as wellness, in the city of Rome,

  • in the third century A.D.

  • We see that in the Baths of Caracalla,

  • just as--if we look at the bathing block--

  • just as in the Baths of Trajan, we see that all the main

  • bathing rooms, which were used both for men

  • and women, but probably at different times

  • of day, are aligned with one another.

  • We see the great frigidarium here,

  • with a triple groin vault over that, buttressed by rooms with

  • barrel vaults on either side.

  • We see a conventional, vertically oriented

  • tepidarium; essentially a rectangle here,

  • leading into the caldarium.

  • So all of these on axis: frigidarium,

  • tepidarium, caldarium.

  • Caldarium, a roundish structure,

  • with alcoves and--but very large in scale.

  • In fact, you'll be interested to hear that the span of the

  • dome of the caldarium of the Baths of Caracalla was

  • almost as large as the span of the dome of the Pantheon in

  • Rome; just to give you a sense of the

  • extraordinary bigger is better scale in this particular bath.

  • Over here a natatio, located where it usually isn't,

  • but here on axis with the other rooms: an interesting

  • natatio with a scalloped side,

  • screened by columns.

  • And then otherwise all the rooms symmetrically disposed

  • around it.

  • The two palaestrae, one on either side -- matching

  • rooms symmetrically disposed around the central building

  • block.

  • So the same imperial bath structure type,

  • that we saw developed under Titus and Trajan,

  • but taken to much larger scale here.

  • This model shows you the hall here.

  • We are looking back at the walls, which were very plain on

  • three sides, toward the natatio,

  • toward the vaulting of the frigidarium.

  • And then the dome, as you can see there,

  • of the caldarium.

  • Interesting is the front side of the--

  • or the side where you can see the caldarium projecting

  • over here, which you can see is opened up

  • much more than the other sides, with a series of columns,

  • screened columns, and then columns screening and

  • opening up the caldarium as well,

  • on the southern side of the monument.

  • Just a few views, to give you a sense of what

  • this structure looks like today.

  • Again, it's mainly piles of concrete faced with brick.

  • But you can see some of the soaring vaults still there.

  • This is in fact--even in this view it's much smaller than it

  • would've been, because so much of the ceilings

  • and the vaults are missing today.

  • But you can get a sense by looking at this family of four,

  • standing next to it, the colossal scale of the Baths

  • of Caracalla in Rome.

  • Here's another view, with some tourists as well,

  • to also give you a sense.

  • Again, this is very incomplete today, but it still gives you

  • some idea of the colossal magnitude of this particular

  • bath structure.

  • As one walks through it, there's actually very little

  • ornamental decoration still preserved, but there was plenty

  • in antiquity.

  • You can see here and there some fragments of a frieze.

  • This is a restored view of what the frigidarium would

  • have looked like, the most important room in the

  • bath, which would have been

  • triple-groin vaulted, as you can see here,

  • which would have had grey granite columns with white

  • marble capitals, and would have had an

  • incredible sculptural display.

  • And Caracalla, like Domitian before him--

  • remember Domitian's Aula Regia and those colossal statues of

  • Dionysus and Apollo, with whom Domitian wanted to

  • associate himself-- Caracalla, of the same ilk,

  • who also wanted to ally himself with great heroes of the past,

  • great gods of the past, and he follows the lead of

  • Commodus, in whose model he kind of--he

  • looked back again to Nero, Domitian, to Commodus--and he

  • likened himself to Hercules.

  • And we have sculpture, that is preserved from the

  • frigidarium that represents Hercules;

  • Hercules, the weary, the famous weary Hercules type.

  • This is now in Naples, in the Archaeological Museum,

  • this statue, but it comes from the

  • frigidarium of the Baths of Caracalla--

  • we're absolutely sure of that--and it depicts the weary

  • Hercules.

  • It is a Roman copy.

  • The artist, we know his name.

  • I've put his name on the Monument List for you,

  • Glykon of Athens.

  • So an Athenian sculptor, working in the time of

  • Caracalla, makes this copy.

  • But he makes it of a very famous lost Greek original by

  • the Greek sculptor Lysippus, whose name is also on your

  • Monument List, a work of art that he

  • originally made in the 330s B.C.

  • So Glycon of Athens copies Lysippus, also of Greece,

  • this statue at the behest again of Caracalla.

  • And the fact that this was a theme or a leitmotif that ran

  • through all the decoration of the frigidarium is

  • underscored by the fact that a composite capital that survives,

  • also from the frigidarium,

  • shows a figure of that same weary Hercules interspersed with

  • the acanthus leaves of that capital.

  • So again a very carefully orchestrated program to try to

  • underscore the relationships between Caracalla and Hercules.

  • Mosaics, geometric mosaics, not unlike those in Ostia,

  • found, and still exist, in the Baths of Caracalla today

  • -- black and white with a little

  • addition of color.

  • Here another section that shows you the interest in geometry,

  • as well as floral motifs.

  • This detail, that you can also see on the

  • site still today, showing the sea scenes that

  • were not-- were the kind of scenes one

  • would expect in a bath, very similar to those at Ostia

  • but done in a somewhat more-- a better way.

  • And then the pièce desistance,

  • I think, of the mosaics of the Baths of Caracalla,

  • and well preserved today, was a mosaic that you can see

  • is curved, to be placed into a room of

  • this shape that depict on the floor all the famous athletes

  • and gladiators of the day, either in full-length images or

  • in portrait images.

  • And I don't doubt that these would have been recognizable

  • stars, superstars--the Alex Rodriguez

  • of their day-- superstars, flexing their

  • muscles for the public, and hoping to be recognized by

  • everyone who came to this bath.

  • And you can just imagine men and women standing above,

  • looking and trying to pick out who is depicted here.

  • Here's another view that I took that is in its current location,

  • which is in the Vatican Museums in Rome.

  • That's where one needs to go to see what survives of this

  • wonderful mosaic with the athletes and gladiators of the

  • day.

  • And I show them to you here as well.

  • And if you look at these, you can see that they not only

  • are shown--some are already victors, some are taking part in

  • their sport.

  • But once again, just as in the Alexander

  • Mosaic, we see the use of a lot of different colored tesserae.

  • We see cast shadows.

  • This is very well done: wonderful facial configurations

  • done by what must have been the leading mosaicist of the day,

  • for the Baths of Caracalla.

  • And just in closing today, I thought I would show you one

  • of those heads, blown up to poster size,

  • as you can see here, but also put it next to an

  • actual portrait of Caracalla.

  • This is not a course in sculpture, but I wanted to show

  • this to you, especially since it's a portrait that you can

  • see.

  • It's in New York, at the Metropolitan Museum of

  • Art -- a very powerful portrait of a very intense Roman emperor,

  • as you can see on the left.

  • But I think there is some relationship between the way in

  • which the sculptors have depicted Caracalla,

  • with his very cubic and abstract face,

  • his short military hairstyle, and the depictions of the

  • athletes and the gladiators.

  • So I think he was not only trying to draw a relationship

  • between himself and Hercules Romanus,

  • but also between himself and some of the greatest athletes

  • and gladiators of the day, to underscore his strength as a

  • leader.

  • It was all for naught ultimately, but nonetheless he

  • achieved it, and I think it also speaks to him as a man with that

  • bigger is better philosophy.

  • Thank you.

Prof: Good morning.

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

17.大きい方がいい。ローマのカラカラと他の第二、第三世紀の建物の浴場 (17. Bigger Is Better: The Baths of Caracalla and Other Second- and Third-Century Buildings in Rome)

  • 168 16
    Sofi に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語