Name: ベクデルの「テスト (The Bechdel 'Test')
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T11:00:01.000Z
Duration: 8 min 18 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

So I read that you should start videos on YouTube with a strong, exciting intro. Something

that will wow and excite people unfamiliar with your work and reward those already familiar

with it. So I'm going to start this one with some titillating disclaimers. How much

more exciting could this intro be! So, first up, I'm a straight, white, cis

man living in a world ruled by straight white cis men. I have every privilege in the world,

and you should bear that in mind when I discuss issues of representation.

Secondly, I really like the Bechdel test as a litmus test of the general state of representation

in the Film industry. It's useful, insightful and easy to apply to films. When I criticise

elements of the so called test I do so only in relation to how it is used.

With those scintillating disclaimers out of the way I want to discuss the Bechdel test.

For those unfamiliar with the Bechdel test it was a set of rules described in Alison

Bechdel's comic strip 'Dykes To Watch Out For' that has become a symbol of and

a tool for feminist critique of films. The three rules that make up the test are as follows.

1. The film has to have at least 2 women in it who 2. Talk to each other 3. About something

besides a man. What is so wonderful about this test, and the reason it has endured as

an idea until this point, is that it sounds like a low bar to pass until you actively

interrogate it in relation to films you're familiar with. The requirements to pass the

test are simple, concise and yet a shockingly low number of films actually pass, even today.

Flip these rules on their head and it's hard to think of a movie that would fail.

So obviously I like the Bechdel test, obviously I think it's useful, it's relevant and

it has a place in discussion about film. But I have four issues with how people use it.

Problem 1. It's not a test for sexist films This may sound a little odd, but the Bechdel

test - a test often used as shorthand for feminist critique of a film - is not, and

shouldn't be used as, a test to see if a film is sexist. Take the recent, excellent,

Moonlight. It fails the test. I don't know anyone that would accuse the film of sexism

for failing that test because Moonlight is a story about a boy becoming a man. It isn't

concerned with anyone except the people that specifically interact with Chiron. He doesn't

have many positive role models and only one of them is a woman, and choosing not to focus

on those women is an appropriate way to handle the story being told. I don't think having

some of those female characters talk with each other would have hurt the film, but Moonlight

focused tightly on what was essential for the narrative and leaving such a potential

scene out doesn't leave the film lacking in any major way.

If we take the Bechdel test as a requirement we would exclude many important and even blatantly

feminist works such as the fascinating Orlando. The Bechdel test as requirement would exclude

Orlando, a film written and directed by a woman, adapted from a book from arguably the

most famous proto-feminist writer, Virginia Woolf, and starring Tilda Swinton in a role

only she could play. That last part isn't really relevant, but if you've seen it it

really is perfect casting, I genuinely don't think anyone else could have played the role.

My point is that Moonlight failing the test does not make it a sexist film and Orlando

failing it doesn't rob it of its distinctly feminist perspective nor should it be seen

to damage any feminist arguments it implicitly or directly makes.

If all of this seems obvious, great, but I wanted to bring up this issue because it seemingly

isn't obvious to many. I saw a professional critic on broadcast television say that Blade

Runner 2049 was sexist because it failed the test. Firstly he was wrong, it's generally

accepted that it did in fact pass the test, but more importantly that it supposedly failed

doesn't and wouldn't explain why the film was sexist. It was a film that was dominated

by male actors, male voices and male perspectives, but that doesn't make the film itself sexist.

That this critic thought it did only demonstrates his ignorance of both what makes the test

useful and the difference between issues of representation and outright sexism.

Problem 2. It's not a minimum standard This one's really brief and quite simple.

It's not a minimum standard to reach. It should be a standard that most films reach,

certainly, but you haven't made a worthwhile film by virtue of passing the test, nor should

a film be considered less valuable for failing it. What the so called test is useful for

then is as an illustration of the issues the film industry has in representing women. If

it is used as a test then that test is useful for revealing just how male dominated most

films are, how few women there are in films and how they've frequently been treated

as an accessory to a male character. But it isn't useful as a demonstration of an individual

film's sexism or misogyny – see the aforementioned Moonlight or Orlando.

Problem 3. The so called 'test' At this point I expect you're wondering

why I haven't shown the specific comic strip the Bechdel test was inspired by. Here is

that strip. I didn't show it up until now because people seemingly leap to use the Bechdel

test without remembering where it came from. People, actively or otherwise, divorce the

test from its original presentation. They forget that 'Dykes to Watch Out For' wasn't

a series of feminist essays on film criticism, it was a humorous, but sometimes pointed,

comic strip. The so called Bechdel 'test' feels cold and sterile in comparison to how

it was originally presented. Now forgive me, I hate to explain a joke, but there are many

levels that this strip works on and the so called 'test' would strip all of those

levels away. The first major gag is seen in the background, the movie posters the characters

pass are all loaded with distinctly phallic imagery, characters clutch their guns and

swords in manners equal parts aggressive and suggestive. The second is the idea that the

rule is strict, particularly when it comes after a panel for thought. the idea that such

a low bar is in fact such a major stumbling block for so many films is funny, but also

rather depressing. Finally there is this panel where one character tells the other the last

film they were able to see under these rules was Alien. Worth noting here is this strip

was released in 1985. Once again it's amusing but with an edge. The specific choice of Alien

as an example, Alien being of course loaded with phallic imagery, is no accident and both

women are visibly unhappy that is the last film they could think of.

The strip as a whole then has a number of ideas and themes, it's telling that the

cinema – a public space – doesn't represent or welcome the interests of the lesbian characters

but the private space can, and no doubt there are messages and ideas I have missed, but

a final layer, and an important one, is that by applying the moral principals of their

personal politics to media consumption the characters would greatly limit what they could

Bechdel's strip 'The Rule' is clever and insightful. The rules it describes are

useful, but they shouldn't be used as a sword to separate harmful and positive representation

lest we exclude some of the very films that feminist ideals would otherwise champion.

Using the so called test to decide whether a film might or might not be sexist is ridiculous

and as much as I do think it's useful I'd much rather appreciate the comic strip than

If there are any of you still subscribed I'd love to hear your thoughts. Is the Bechdel

test still useful? Have you left a comment to tell me that I should have mentioned the

rule was inspired by what Bechdel's friend, Liz Wallace, said? Oh, ah, speaking of which

[problem 4. It should be called the Wallace test].

As always I'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments below.