Name: ジョーダン・ピーターソンがNZの価値を脅かす (Jordan Peterson Threatens Everything of Value In NZ)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T10:24:59.000Z
Duration: 1 h 3 min
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

I'm in Australia and New Zealand off to New Zealand in the next couple of days, and I thought I'd bring you up to date with a story that's being breaking their that's of some substantial interest and a certain degree of absurdity.

A group they're known as Auckland Peace Action released a press release on Monday, 11th of February 2019 stating quote Jordan Peterson threatens everything of value in our society, which I had to admit.

It was rather impressive because that's not an easy thing to manage.

Anyways, I'll read you a little bit of it.

What happened after the release was that a journalist shown Plunkett interviewed the author or the spokesperson of this particular press release, and then we had a chance to talk the next day.

And so what you're going to see in this video is me reading the press release.

Then you're going to see Sean interviewing Iris Chris Oh, seaq Hope I've got that reasonably right of Auckland Peace Action, and then you're going to see the full interview that I had with Shaun the next day.

So here goes Jordan Peterson threatens everything of value in our society in the lead up to Jordan Peterson's visit to New Zealand.

We have a duty to condemn his sexist, queer, phobic, racist and deeply reactionary views, says Iris Chris Oh Seaq of Auckland Peace Action Jordan Peterson, professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, turned right wing media celebrity is in New Zealand to promote his book, 12 Rules for Life.

This book, while offering superficially useful life advice to an audience of disaffected white men, promotes a reactionary, misogynistic view of the world utterly in opposition to New Zealand values.

Well, we as a country have many problems.

Our values of gender equality, egalitarianism and social inclusivity ease as Miss Crazy Zach Jordan Peterson is actively trying to undermine these values.

The rest of it, you can find it at schoo politics, if you're interested on now, will turn to Shaun's interview with Iris and his analysis of her claims.

Iris, your group has come out with a press release yesterday that got some coverage saying Jordan Peterson threatens everything of value in our society.

What is stealing kids to clean their room up represent the end of civilization as we know what I would say.

It's such a telling kids to clean the room is probably not a bad thing.

The issue comes with a set of, you know, pretty far from all that Jordan, because of doing not really.

That's what he's promoting on this to her.

These men, I would say Not if you can, like, I mean, if you take a look, some of what's actually see it in his book.

And many of the media comedy has made elsewhere.

That seems quite clear that he has some seriously problematic of years.

91 Okay, so let's see clips begin with the kind of service interview with Camille Paglia.

Well, you know, he believes that discussions of mean he knows how you know he knows where he stands more late because kind of a guest of honor or something is backed by the recent physical force.

His argument is that mean can put, um ah, Men are better at putting barriers around social interaction between each other because there's three implicit and underlying reality that if things get out of control would mean have a conversation.

There is the possibility off physical violence, and he sees that subconscious chick on how far or how, if you like bitchy a conversation can get is tempered by that knowledge I don't see does does that very suggestion or idea which I know a lot of people agree with.

Does that threaten Western civilization in the very foundations in everything of value in our society?

Well, I'm not going to speak about what I want to kick it off with civilization and our women.

But if you consider something like, say, I mean, consider basically how that's going, how that kind of statement is going to be raised, I think it's going to be read by means saying we need to think about deny The difference is the biological, and I guess behavioral differences between sixes and we need to talk about these things honestly and openly if we're gonna make progress on some of the issues off gender in NASA.

But on the cultural Mueller were, frankly, homosexuals are still getting beaten up.

We have ridiculous rates of domestic partner violence.

Frankly, I just just want to check his Jordan Peterson to your knowledge of a beating this wife for beating up a homosexual.

Nor has he ever advocated people beat their wives, obeyed homosexuals.

So effective Metro's Jordan Peterson has allowed split.

There are many people paying attention to him.

And if you're making statements in such a situation, it is vitally important that you kind of that the statements you make can not be Mr Reed in a such a way as to promote, which is he's hardly responsible for the misreading of a statement says he I would save up.

Look, if you want to make you feel everyone has made kind of if you don't want yes, if you do it repeatedly and you won't replace it looks that talk about things.

You're interested in an open and intellectual.

Do you think his ideas to too dangerous and he shouldn't be allowed to speak in New Zealand.

The issue, how is there is a set of ideas are it's That's his ideas are rather more problematic.

Per specifically that you should clean your room, that you should hold your shoulders back, that you should take responsibility for your own life, that people shouldn't be compelled by governments to use with its particular words in particular circumstances.

Okay, One of those particular words in particular circumstance.

That makes the government two four effectively took use government used.

The first government will force to do their best.

But we're just taking our being read into the media, including by some people.

Yeah, well, he can't be responsible for the stupidity of people reading his statement skinny again.

As I'm saying, Do you think that's still enough?

Do you think that I do feel that people are never responsible for things?

But I'd also say that it would seem to me from my observation of the impact that Jordan Peterson has head on people's lives that it's been overwhelmingly positive for a huge number of people, which is why so incredibly popular.

In point of fact, you can say the same thing about a lot of fascist movements.

They have a very positive effect on the life of meaning.

No, I'm not saying I am saying that here I am saying that he's exploiting a lot of the same kind of exploiting anything.

He doesn't compel anyone to go to his talks to look at his stuff on YouTube as it's exposing anyone.

I'm not think I mean exploiting in terms of he is using the same check like he is using the same basic psychological mechanisms to build a base.

He's just saying what he thinks and people happen to be interested.

Are you suggesting he's running some campaign to destroy the Western world?

I just I just think that he is a very responsible man who is making it well, let's talk about let's talk about responsibility, shall we?

In your group Oakland P section, you would like people not to go and see, see it in films and you're happy to physically into, say, to stop them seeing sitting films and infect your Wellington branch bought fake bombs to create terror at 2018 at a film festival.

And stop people watching a film about being Gary in Right.

So you're putting a very negative spin alone in the world.

Let's just think I was just saying some Thanks, Mike.

So what do you think is a greater threat to our society threatening to plant fake bombs in a movie theater and telling people they can't go and see a movie because your group doesn't like it?

Do you think that's a greater threat to our society than Jordan Peterson bookie out of hall and say, Pay some money and come and see me if you want.

字幕リスト動画再生

ジョーダン・ピーターソンがNZの価値を脅かす (Jordan Peterson Threatens Everything of Value In NZ)

sort

absolutely

phenomenon

genuinely