Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • You're too upset, poopsie.

  • And that's it.

  • Your news.

  • Good evening.

  • I'm Poppy's Moria, lead anchor of Pune years, the most esteemed new source of all time.

  • Our first news.

  • Come YouTube.

  • You too bad.

  • Say it with me.

  • You, Too bad they posted on Twitter, saying, Many of you has told us that we need to do a better job preventing harassment or YouTube doubt doubt impressing the X.

  • It's a big X here.

  • We consulted with a wide array of creator, stout experts and organizations to update the harassment policy, which changed today.

  • Out.

  • Here's what it covers.

  • All right, well, let's read through this.

  • Let's break this down.

  • The official blawg.

  • Let's go through.

  • It doesn't matter.

  • The thing that I've learned about users policies is that it doesn't matter what they say.

  • What matters is how they enforce it.

  • And we've already seen how it's done.

  • They may they change this harassment policy.

  • Their first move, their first order of business, apparently was to remove items leafy content cut.

  • That was a think Are they up there to the policy so they could get rid of this video?

  • Finally.

  • What if you read the block post it says beyond threatening someone.

  • There's also demeaning language that goes too far too far.

  • I Tubbs too far.

  • When I dub said Chin small too far, it's so stupid.

  • Apparently allegedly Leaf for himself has said that this is his complete bogus.

  • His whole channel leafy himself is made of criticizing other channels.

  • Comeback leafy, Come back.

  • We miss you.

  • We need you diet.

  • We're in dire need over here in the versatile.

  • Why retroactively take down videos?

  • If you're gonna make a new policy change, then go from there.

  • Don't go back in old videos to say, Actually, this one, this one bad What does that fix reading, Maurine this block post.

  • It's clear that they made this as a response to what happened earlier this year between, uh Steven Crowder and that box guy.

  • And Crowder was poking fun of his homosexual mannerisms, which I will not replicate because whenever I think about it, I just can't believe anyone would do that.

  • I'm joking.

  • Of course, we'll get more into that horizon.

  • Hurts our community by making people less inclined to share their opinion and engage with each other.

  • We heard this from time and time again.

  • from creators.

  • This does the opposite.

  • YouTube creators are from the generates.

  • They're the worst people out there.

  • Speaking from a youtuber.

  • We pull the worst imaginable just to get views on this site.

  • That's how we get paid thus far.

  • Yes, I used that word.

  • The only thing keeping these YouTube vultures and check our other YouTubers.

  • We have this anarchy system.

  • Okay, Don't come and ruin it for us.

  • You to the rule is if you do dumb shit on YouTube, you will get called out on it.

  • We need that.

  • It's the only thing keeping the same YouTube.

  • Don't take it away from us, please.

  • A couple examples.

  • And this is just a handful Daddio five making videos, abusing Children, his own kids or step kids out of No.

  • Was it YouTube that strike down those videos was a YouTube that took the first step in action to make sure something happened there.

  • No, no, it was other YouTubers.

  • Guess they could just flagged them down for bullying.

  • Now the same tactics is used.

  • I'm not gonna name it.

  • Name the scumbags name, but it's same tactic is used right now with another degenerate creator is getting criticized by other YouTubers the weight the tactic he uses to strike it down is to copy strike those videos where he gets the money from those creators.

  • Now you're just giving Maur tools to these scumbags to strike down criticism.

  • Logan Poll showed a video with a dead body, a corpse.

  • It wasn't removed by YouTube.

  • No, no, no, no, no, no.

  • It was removed by Logan after other people criticized him promoting gambling.

  • Two kids did you to do anything about that?

  • No, no, it was other creators that notice it and called it out, making videos, milking people's recently get passing.

  • Are you two gonna addict policy for that?

  • Because previous leads YouTubers telling people to not be with these things and otherwise they would get away with it.

  • If you took no one's good to them, they'll keep their fucking hands out of this well developed 100% unf lawd system.

  • Where you dumb?

  • You get called out.

  • That's just how it is.

  • I don't dump, too.

  • I get called out.

  • That's epic.

  • It's not epic, actually, but it's good is good for everyone.

  • Further on, they say, we've always removed videos that explicitly threaten someone reveal confidential information and encourage people to have someone moving forward.

  • Our policy, a bull go and a step further and not only prohibit explicit threats but also implied threats.

  • We don't want to be dumped.

  • Three enough, so we're gonna dump threesome more.

  • We're going to go a step further on our demo, which mucky implied threats I think is really good.

  • Because YouTube 100% knows the intent of people.

  • The video cold on by they censored the thumbnail because it was just completely horrible.

  • It's called the death of a tree.

  • A tree.

  • It was a video criticizing a tree, a tree.

  • Whatever your opinion of the video is, it got removed.

  • And I think it was because he was holding a gun towards Eighth Street story in the thumbnail.

  • I think I think that's how I remember it.

  • You think a jury's it's scared for his safety because of that video needed to be gone.

  • I mean, everyone knew a she is.

  • She was in big trouble because it was personal safety, thanks to that thumbnail.

  • I mean, my God, what we have done.

  • No one thinks he's going to shoot a tree, A tree just cause he hold up a gun.

  • No one is fearing for a safety.

  • Why are you doing that?

  • Why is there no distinction between intent and actual action?

  • It's not that hard to telling in apart English.

  • So I asked you to about this because I was kind of worried where they're going to draw the distinction.

  • And they said that distracts will fall under artistic content and scripted comedy and sand up.

  • It's fine, but you can't abuse the artistic content as an excuse to keep harassing someone.

  • Ah, lot of people raise the question I've seen other YouTubers being like.

  • Okay, so I came late night show hosts, you know, make fun of Donald Trump as an example, because they're pretty relentless with it, to a point where it just stopped being funny years ago.

  • But apparently it's an American media rule.

  • This is just what I've heard but says that you can ridicule public figures.

  • That's fine, Thank God, Thank God.

  • Public figures are still up to ridicule.

  • Aren't we old public figures on YouTube?

  • Isn't that the point like this doesn't make sense to me.

  • Why do they get a pass and some don't it seems very selective.

  • If someone understands explained to me, I don't understand this, it should be the same.

  • And to summarize this, I think it seems the same case for a lot of YouTube's update, where the intention is good.

  • I don't think people should get a tax for their sexual light into Dior.

  • But it's always like this is what we want to strike down, and then all these other things and consequences is the result of it, and I don't understand how that happens every time.

  • It's like hop.

  • I wasn't enough.

  • There's no kids content or YouTube, and there's no edgy content anymore on YouTube.

  • But what we have here encapsulated it's very nice.

  • Very night.

  • Delicious stale content takes so stale lights a cozy little sinks.

  • It's so boring, but it's so media friendly poppies Maria from the future here.

  • I don't have time to record this, but I wanted to make an update on the whole complex situation that I covered last week.

  • For those that you don't know now, as a creator, you have to tag your video if it's made for kids or if it isn't and there's a lot of confusion based on what his family friendly then or what is made for kids, and it's still pretty unclear.

  • But hopefully we'll get Maur update question mark where the distinction is.

  • We sold ready that a lot of channels were flagged us four kids when they clearly were not.

  • And I got really upset about it because I think it's bullshit that YouTube decides and then they're wrong when you could lose up to 90% of your revenue.

  • But according to what I've heard, it's closer to 60%.

  • Okay, it still sucks.

  • But the main issue I'm making this update is because because even if you took tag your video asked made for kids, you can still remove that tag.

  • It's not like a branding mating.

  • I don't know Iron Fork or something.

  • You can still remove it.

  • It doesn't matter.

  • What matters is that you make your own distinction if you're content is made for kids or not, and the fine that is quoted 42,000 from the FTC.

  • If you make it an issue, is only if you're a big YouTube better, and I'm the one that's going to get that fine.

  • If you're smaller.

  • YouTuber Ah, and you happen to get fine, which seems unlikely because they're not just gonna go over after the bigger ones first anyway.

  • So it's still very frustrating, and it's still very annoying, but it's not as panic mode as it seems.

  • At least that's what I gather from it.

  • So I just wanted to talk to you guys on that back to period a pie.

  • In the past, it's Moria published Morioka.

  • The next news, the most searched people and celebrities, was revealed by prom.

  • How we have Belle Duffy in the Kim K.

  • Card to be Linda Plague area in the Nikki Gra blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

  • Beauty pie.

  • Who the fuck is searching beauty pie on Valentine's Day?

  • What is wrong with you?

  • For 5000% increase 5000 a beat Kendall Jenner Suck it, Kendall.

  • You can suck it small people.

  • I'm gonna say it, Kendall.

  • Gender smoke peopIe You can now vote for the creator of the air aboard.

  • Go vote, Mr Beast.

  • Because everyone else on this lays the stale and boring.

  • And I hate them.

  • I was kidding it some of these to get a pass, but I still hate them.

  • Okay, Video game awards happened.

  • That's a good That's fun.

  • Vessel was fun.

  • I love video game awards.

  • So there's this guy.

  • Oh God, I tried Thio find the whole video games awards online, but it's being currently blocked by W M G because of copyright grounds.

  • YouTube 2019 everyone.

  • It just keeps getting better and better.

  • That's what I enjoy the most of the step by step improvements that keep recurring, and it just makes it so great.

  • I love it so much.

  • I think now is a great time as any to announce.

  • I have special announcement to make.

  • I am taking break from YouTube next year.

  • I wanted to say it in advance because I made up my mind.

  • I'm tired.

  • I'm tired.

  • I'm feeling very tired.

  • I don't know if you can tell.

  • Just so you know, early next year, I'll be away for a little while.

  • I'll explain that later, but I wanted to give a heads up and that's it for me.

  • For not hope.

  • You guys enjoy this episode of Pew News.

  • I'm published Moria and I'm out sees I'm sme out sees.

  • That's good.

You're too upset, poopsie.

字幕と単語

ワンタップで英和辞典検索 単語をクリックすると、意味が表示されます

B1 中級

YouTubeの新アップデートには大きな欠陥がある!PEW NEWS ? (YouTube's New Update Has A BIG FLAW! ?PEW NEWS ?)

  • 0 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語