Name: 誘惑されて、小さな、安いGTX 1650で... (Tempted By a Tiny, Cheap GTX 1650...)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T10:06:59.000Z
Duration: 11 min 10 s
Description: VoiceTubeの動画で発音を聞きながら英語表現を覚えよう！学べる英語：

I don't ever wanna welcome to another video.

When this card first came out not too long ago, I completely ignored.

It didn't even bother picking one up to review.

I read a couple of other reviews, and it got absolutely slated.

People saying that if you want a car that performs like this, just purchased the Rx 5 70 witches off a similar price and actually that's a little bit better in terms of gaming on for the price roughly 141 £150.

Here in the UK it was certainly cheaper toe up for an Rx 5 70 as well.

And when you take into account used market, you can find the forget version for under £100.

This never really crossed my mind, and today I finally took the plans simply because I picked this one up on eBay for just £89.

But it isn't without its problems, so this is probably the cheapest 16 50 I could find.

Anywhere it was described was not working.

I don't know how the owner has broken it already.

Um, and there was certainly no other broken ones about.

So I'm gonna open it up, see exactly what's wrong with it, if anything, and then finally review this car.

Because at the end of the day, if there's one thing that the 16 50 still sounds good for, is low power systems or pre built Dell's things like that that have pretty bad power supplies inside them.

In fact, I've just read that So tackle, bringing out a low profile version of the card as well.

I wish I hung around a bit to try and grab one of those.

Nonetheless, we've ended up with this one.

So let's get it out the box, see exactly what's wrong with it and bring you what is probably the latest Jew ticks.

So the first thing you'll notice is just how small this cart is.

I mean, I haven't got massive giant hands.

I'm six foot one, so I've got six foot one size hands that makes sense on this thing.

And that's actually a really small banana.

Something my ex girlfriend said Now that we must see what is up with this one.

I actually purchased it for one of those sellers who buys back broken cards from consumers.

You know, the ones who say, Oh, I got this as part of a large customer return stock from a PC retailer on dhe, we are unable to test it due to not having that appropriate facilities.

So, over to the test system, we're gonna install the 16.

5 84 100 something I use instead of the rise and five for game tests because it produces slightly better frame rates.

We've got 16 gigs of DDR four overcooked to 3200 megahertz, and we've got an M aside, said 3 78 pro unnecessary for the eye.

Should I want to upgrade in a couple of years time to saying I seven, something like that.

But I probably switched to rise and again before then, so it's it's irrelevant, really.

This was just on sale for light, £50 anyway, the 16 fifties going in and that we just like that.

No need for one of these pesky cables, none of that getting in the way.

We just talked that down there and there were already two guys.

Amazon decided in their infinite wisdom, that instead of the two foot one I order data, send me a four meter HD my cable because the two foot one was out of stock, which somehow makes for a sensible replacement.

But let's go ahead and turn the PC on and there we have it.

At least we've got to the Windows home screen.

Yeah, there doesn't seem to be any artifacts on the screen.

So I guess all we can do now is used this for a bit.

See if we've actually got a pretty decent bargain here, or whether or not the 16 50 decides toe start having a few issues.

So at this point, it's safe to assume that my palate GTX 16 50 storm.

Oh, see addition here is working correctly for impending games all day on while I throw up some benchmark figures, let's talk about this thing.

This particular version is among the cheapest cards when bought.

No, it features a 14 85 megahertz based clock and 17 25 megahertz boost clock with four gigs of Judy are five the Ram and support for up to four K resolution at 60 hertz.

And therefore requires No six pin power connector A 300.

I don't know why it was listed as 40 but it seems that company I bought it from genuinely didn't test it.

I think they buy lots of usually broken or problematic GP use, so they just assume that everything that comes in this part of the wholesale lots don't work.

So perhaps the first owner just had a really bad power supply that couldn't handle this thing.

That's hard to believe, considering it will run on nearly anything.

But I can't see a reason why it would be deemed 40.

Otherwise, it can handle a lot of games a 10 80 p, with the high priest averaging 60 frames per second or near it.

I mentioned before that the Rx 5 70 costs less and performs better.

But I think for say, Dare or HP pre built the ones with questionable power supply units that, like a six pin cable, this card would be the most powerful thing you could stick in there, And that's the only thing I could recommend.

I thought that in the month I've waited before shopping for one of these, the price might have gone down, so it will be easier to recommend.

But I guess No, you've heard it all before, though I'm sure the purpose here was to fix up a broken card, one that I thought was broken anyway.

And it turns out I didn't even need to do that.

Still, I'd like to see the R P dropped two, maybe 119 or even £99 because I think it could do a lot more damage to the competition there, considering its small size and ability to fit in a wide variety of machines to this is like the ideal car for those who hate spending too much on power supplies.

You know, I don't recommend tripping out on a PS you, but if you did, then one of these cars would be perfect, as it would likely ram fine.

There wasn't any hint of a secret message there, I hope, because I genuinely wouldn't recommend it.

You'll never know when you want to upgrade your GPU.

And if you've got a not so great PS you in there, well, it might mean that the whole thing goes boom.

So you've seen what it can do in modern Triple eight titles so far.

But let's finish off the video with a few more demanding games and see how it continues to handle them when using 10 80 p full HD resolution as well as the high settings, because that's something that it seems to be quite comfortable with.

In most scenarios, though, as you may have seen, there might be some slowdown in certain instances.

Assassin's creed Odyssey in itself is one of those examples on Battlefield Five will have moments where the frame rate does drop into the high forties so continuing our gaming session with the GTX 16 50 here and moving on to just calls for I was pleasantly surprised with the results.

Any TP with the highest settings as reviews throughout produced an average of 60 a F.

P s with a 1% low of 51 on a 510.1% loan of 25 indicating a little bit of stutter.

There were a couple of occasional dips, nothing gained breaking here.

Just cause for is, of course, more line on the graphics card, so it's no surprise to see the 16 50 struggling in some areas of the game.

But with an average like that, I think it was a pretty decent performance.

Now Metro Exodus tends to fare a lot better if you take the benchmark result from in game as opposed to the bill in Benchmark Test.

I did that nonetheless, because it's a worst case scenario type thing, and here, if you use the highest settings, you'll probably see around 32 frames per second.

With the Jew tick 16 50 I overestimated its power here.

I think the best bet here is normal settings in Metro Exodus, though as I said before.

Once you're actually playing the game, you should have a much better time anyway.