Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • LAWS.

  • NOT THE SKEWED VIEW FROM ADAM

  • SCHIFF'S BEADY EYES.

  • JOINING US WITH MORE IS TEXAS

  • SENATOR TED CRUZ IS WITH US.

  • LET'S START WITH A QUESTION IN

  • YOUR WHEEL HOUSE TO YOUR GREAT

  • CREDIT.

  • NOW MY READING OF THE

  • CONSTITUTION IS PRETTY CLEAR,

  • NOT VERY COMPLICATED.

  • THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,

  • THEY ALONE NOT THE SENATE, HAVE

  • THE ZOL POWER TO IMPEACH A

  • PRESIDENT.

  • IS THAT RIGHT, SIR?

  • >> THAT'S RIGHT.

  • >> AND THE SENATE THEY HAVE THE

  • ZOL RESPONSIBILITY CONSTITUTION

  • AL AUTHORITY TO HAVE THE TRIAL,

  • CORRECT STPHEUPLGT THAT'S RIGHT.

  • NANCY PELOSI GOT A LITTLE

  • CONFUSED ON THAT BUT YOU'RE

  • RIGHT.

  • >> HELP ME OUT HERE.

  • I LOVE YOUR IDEA, YOU'RE THE

  • SAVING GRACE IN ALL OF THIS.

  • WHY WOULD REPUBLICAN SENATORS

  • THEY'RE SUPPOSE TO HEAR THE

  • CASE, WHY DID YOU IMPEACH HIM.

  • NOT ENHANCE THE CASE OR MAKE THE

  • CASE, THEIR JOB IS LET THEM

  • PRECEPT THE CASE.

  • MONTH CASE THEN THEY VOTE TO

  • ACQUIT.

  • WHY ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT

  • BRINGING IN OTHER PEOPLE

  • STPHURPBLGT LISTEN, I THINK

  • YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT.

  • THE GOOD NEWS IS THE PARTISAN

  • CIRCUS IN THE HOUSE IS OVER.

  • NANCY PELOSI'S CIRCUS IS DONE.

  • WE WON'T SEE THE ONE SIDED SHOW

  • TRIAL THAT THE HOUSE HAS BEEN

  • ENGAGED IN FOR MONTHS AND

  • MONTHS.

  • THAT FARCE IS OVER.

  • HERE IS WHAT I HOPE HAPPENS.

  • THE SENATE WILL CONDUCT A FARE

  • TRIAL.

  • THAT MEANS WE WILL GIVE THE

  • HOUSE MANAGERS A CHANCE TO

  • PRESENT THEIR CASE.

  • WE WILL LISTEN TO WHAT THEY HAVE

  • TO SAY.

  • WE WILL DO SOMETHING THE HOUSE

  • DIDN'T DO.

  • WE WILL GIVE PRESIDENT TRUMP A

  • FULL OPPORTUNITY TO DEFEND HIS

  • CASE AND LAY OUT THE FAX AND

  • EVIDENCE TO LAY OUT THE LAW THE

  • FACTS IGNORED.

  • ONCE THE PRESIDENT DEFENDS

  • HIMSELF I'M CONFIDENT THAT THE

  • RESULT WILL BE THE PRESIDENT IS

  • ACQUITTED.

  • THE REASON IS THE ARTICLES OF

  • IMPEACHMENT ON THEIR FACE ARE

  • RIDICULOUS.

  • THEY DON'T SATISFY THE

  • CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARD OF HIGH

  • CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS

  • WE HAVE MOVED OUT OF NANCY

  • PELOSI'S WORLD.

  • SHE KNEW WHEN THE HOUSE DIDN'T

  • HAVE IT THEY COULDN'T PUT ON A

  • KANGAROO COURT LIKE THEY.

  • HAVE INSTEAD WE WILL MOVE TO THE

  • SENATE WHERE I HOPE AND BELIEVE

  • WE WILL FOLLOW THE LAW AND

  • ACQUIT THE PRESIDENT.

  • >> THE FEDERAL RULES OF

  • EVIDENCE, I UNDERSTAND THEM,

  • HAVE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE

  • U.S. SUPREME COURT, JOHN ROBERTS

  • WILL PROVIDE OVER THIS

  • SCHIFF-SHAM SHOW.

  • FEDERAL RULES.

  • GLAD YOU HAVE A SENSE OF HUMOR,

  • SENATOR SHOULD PEOPLE DON'T GET

  • IT, CONFIDENTIALLY.

  • NOW WE HAVE A SITUATION WHERE

  • FEDERAL EVIDENCE IS CLEAR.

  • HERE IS A EVIDENCE IS

  • INADMISSIBLE.

  • OPINION WITNESSES ARE NICE,

  • EXPERTS ARE ON ALL SIDES.

  • THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE

  • TRIAL.

  • THERE IS ONE FACT WITNESS THE

  • HOUSE BROUGHT IN.

  • THE AMBASSADOR.

  • THEY WANT NOTHING NO QUI QUO

  • PRO.

  • >> YOU'RE RIGHT THE BULK OF THE

  • TESTIMONY IN THE HOUSE WOULD BE

  • INADMISSIBLE IN ANY FEDERAL

  • COURT OR STATE COURT.

  • A LOT WAS HERE SAY.

  • PEOPLE WITH NO DIRECT EVIDENCE.

  • NEVER MET PRESIDENT TRUMPING -P

  • OR HEARD WHAT HE TO SAY.

  • A LOT OF THE TESTIMONY WAS

  • ESSENTIALLY I DON'T KNOW BUT I

  • KNOW A GUY WHO KNEW A GUY THAT

  • TOLD ME THIS HAPPENED.

  • THERE IS A REASON THAT COURTS

  • DON'T LET THAT IN, IT'S

  • NOTORIOUSLY UNRELIABLE.

  • THAT BEING SAID IF THE HOUSE

  • MANAGERS GET UP AND WANT TO DO A

  • PRESENTATION ON THE SOMETHING

  • KNEW A GUY THAT KNEW A GUY I

  • FEEL CONFIDENT PRESIDENT TRUMP

  • LAWYER WILL EAT THEIR LUNCH.

  • IT'S RIDICULOUS.

  • THE REASON YOU KNOW IT'S

  • RIDICULOUS IF YOU LOOK AT THE

  • ARTICLES THE HOUSE VOTED OUT.

  • YOU REMEMBER FOR MONTHS AND

  • MONTHS THEY TALKED ABOUT QUI QUO

  • PRO.

  • THEY DIDN'T VOTE ON ANYTHING.

  • THEY TALKED WEEKS AND WEEKS FOR

  • BRIBERY.

  • THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IN THE

  • HISTORY OF THE COUNTRY A

  • PRESIDENT HAS BEEN IMPEACHED

  • WITHOUT AN ARTICLE EVEN ALLEGING

  • CRIMINAL CONDUCT.

  • THEY DON'T ALLEGE A SINGLE

  • FEDERAL LAW VIOLATED, A CRIMINAL

  • LAW, CIVIL LAW.

  • THIS IS A PARTISAN SHAM.

  • THEY'RE MAD, THE HOUSE DEMOCRATS

  • ARE MAD AT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

  • FOR ELECTED PRESIDENT TRUMP.

  • THAT'S WHY THE RESULT OF THIS IS

  • GOING TO BE REJECTING THE

  • ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT.

  • YOU MENTIONED WITNESSES.

  • I DON'T KNOW IF THERE WILL BE 51

  • SENATORS TO BRING WITNESSES IN

  • OR NOT.

  • I THINK THERE IS PLENTY ALREADY

  • TO REJECT THE RIDICULOUS

  • ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT.

  • >> IF THEY'RE BRINGING ARTICLES

  • IN WE WON'T DO A ONE-SIDED SHOW

  • TRIAL.

  • I THINK IT SHOULD BE A BARE

  • MINIMUM ONE FOR ONE.

  • IF THE PROSECUTION BRINGS A

  • WITNESS.

  • IF THEY BRING JOHN BOLTON THEN

  • THE PRESIDENT CAN BRING IN A

  • WITNESS, HUNTER BIDEN.

  • IT SHOULD BE FARE AND EVEN.

  • THAT SCARES THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS

  • OUT OF DEMOCRATS.

  • THEY KNOW THIS WOULD LOSE ON THE

  • FACTS.

  • >> I WOULD LOVE TO SEE SCHIFF

  • THE NON WHISTLE BLOWER, HERE

  • SIGH WHISTLE BLOWER, QUI QUO PRO

  • JOE AND NO EXPERIENCE HUNTER.

  • I WOULD LIKE ALL FOUR OF THEM.

  • WE CAN TRADE.

  • NONE OF THE MEETINGS THEY HAD

  • WAS AID DISCUSSION OR ON THE

  • CALL SENATOR.

  • >> THEY DON'T WANT TO GET INTO

  • THE FACTS.

  • WHAT THEY'RE TERRIFIED OF.

  • YOU HAVE DONE A GREAT JOB

  • ADDRESSING IT, IT'S A

  • SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE OF REAL

  • CORRUPTION.

  • YOU HAVE HUNTER BIDEN MAKING

  • $83,000 A MONTH FROM THE BIGGEST

  • NATURAL GAS COMPANY IN THE

  • UKRAINE.

  • WHAT WAS HE BEING PAID FOR?

  • HIS DAD HE OTHER WAS VICE

  • PRESIDENT AND INTERVENING IN A

  • DIRECT WAY.

  • THAT IS SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE, I

  • BELIEVE, OF CORRUPTION.

  • AT A MINIMUM IT'S MORE THAN

  • ENOUGH FOR THE PRESIDENT TO SAY

  • WE WILL FOLLOW THE LAW AND IN

  • VET GATE IT.

  • I EXPECT TO HEAR THAT AT

  • CONSIDERABLE LENGTH FROM THE

  • DEFENSE TEAM.

  • >> SENATOR I LOVE YOUR PROPOSAL.

  • HAVE THE WITNESSES ONE FOR ONE.

  • IF THEY GET TO PICK FOUR I GET

  • THE FOUR I WANT.

  • ADAM SCHIFF A WITNESS IN HIS OWN

LAWS.

字幕と単語

動画の操作 ここで「動画」の調整と「字幕」の表示を設定することができます

B1 中級

テッド・クルーズ上院議員ナンシー・ペロシの弾劾サーカスは終わった (Sen. Ted Cruz: Nancy Pelosi's impeachment circus is done)

  • 11 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語