Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • HE WAS THERE IN 2018.

  • >> Neil: THANK YOU, MY FRIEND.

  • MY NEXT GUEST IS PART OF THE

  • SHORTLISTS TO BE PART OF THE

  • PRESIDENT'S LEGAL TEAM.

  • HE JOINS US RIGHT NOW.

  • GOOD TO HAVE YOU.

  • >> THANK YOU, NEIL.

  • >> Neil: LET'S DISCUSS WHAT

  • THE STRATEGY COULD BE HERE.

  • AT THE ISSUE OF WITNESSES.

  • WE HAVE A NUMBER OF REPUBLICANS

  • OPEN TO THE PROSPECT OF

  • WITNESSES.

  • IT ISN'T THAT SIMPLE.

  • IT COULD GET PRETTY INVOLVED.

  • >> WHICH WITNESSES?

  • THE ONES THE HOUSE COULD'VE

  • CALLED BUT FAILED TO?

  • WHAT IS THE STANDARD ABOUT WHAT

  • YOU COULD DECIDE WHETHER TO CALL

  • A WITNESS?

  • IS IT RELEVANCY?

  • THAT IS A PRETTY LOW STANDARD.

  • YOU CAN'T JUST CALL A COUPLE.

  • THERE MAY BE A SENATOR WHO WANTS

  • TO HEAR FROM SOME WITNESS THAT

  • YOU AND I HAVE NEVER THOUGHT OF

  • BEFORE.

  • WHAT IS THE STANDARD BY WHICH

  • YOU JUDGE WHETHER OR NOT TO ADD

  • WITNESSES?

  • MY POSITION IS, IT IS THE

  • HOUSE'S JOB TO INVESTIGATE.

  • IF THEY DIDN'T THINK ENOUGH TO

  • CALL A WITNESS DURING THE

  • INVESTIGATION, THAN FIVE SAID

  • THIS AND IT?

  • >> Neil: THEY CAN COUNTER THAT

  • THEY TRIED A NUMBER OF PEOPLE

  • AND THEIR PRESIDENT WAS

  • PREVENTING THEM FROM SPEAKING.

  • BUT NEVERTHELESS, IT RAISES AN

  • ISSUE -- IF THEY GET JOHN BOLTO

  • BOLTON, OBVIOUSLY, REPUBLICANS

  • WILL WANT JOE BIDEN AND/OR

  • HUNTER BIDEN.

  • AND ON AND ON WE GO.

  • >> NEIL, YOU GET JOHN BOLTON.

  • EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE STILL APPLY?

  • YOU CANNOT CALL A WITNESS THAT

  • YOU KNOW IT'S GOING TO INVOKE

  • PRIVILEGE.

  • IT IS THAT TERRIBLE OBJECT.

  • YOU CAN'T DO IT IN A COURTROOM.

  • YOU SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO IT

  • IN AN IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING.

  • I GOING TO CALL A WITNESS THAT

  • YOU KNOW IT'S GOING TO INVOKE

  • THE FIFTH?

  • ARE YOU GOING TO CALL A WITNESS

  • THAT YOU KNOW IT'S GOING TO

  • EVOKE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE?

  • IF YOU CAN'T DO THAT IN THE REAL

  • WORLD, WHY WOULD YOU CALL A

  • WITNESS SIMPLY FOR THE APPLICANT

  • HAVING THAT WITNESS SAY THAT I

  • CAN'T ANSWER BASED ON EXECUTIVE

  • PRIVILEGE?

  • I GET THAT PEOPLE DON'T LIKE

  • PRIVILEGES.

  • THERE IS A REASON THAT WE HAVE

  • THEM.

  • AND WE HAVE THEM BECAUSE THE

  • RELATIONSHIP IS MORE IMPORTANT

  • THAN THE INFORMATION.

  • THAT IS TRUE WITH --

  • >> Neil: AND CONGRESS?

  • HOW DO THEY DO IT?

  • IT WOULD NOT BE LIVE SENATE

  • TESTIMONY.

  • IT GOES BACK TO THE CLINTON

  • MOTIF.

  • THEY HAVE THE DEPOSITION AND THE

  • SENATORS AND READ FROM PREPARED

  • REMARKS IN THOSE DEPOSITIONS.

  • IT IS NOT THE PERSON HIM OR

  • HERSELF TALKING.

  • >> BUT YOU KNOW WHAT, NEIL?

  • IF YOU HAVE EVER SERVED ON A

  • JURY, TO BE ABLE TO DETERMINE

  • WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE IS

  • TELLING THE TRUTH, YOU NEED TO

  • EYEBALL THEM.

  • YOU NEED TO WATCH THE DEMEANOR.

  • HOW THE HILL DO YOU DO THAT IN A

  • DEPOSITION?

  • I CANNOT THINK OF ANYTHING MORE

  • BORING THAN HAVING ADAM SCHIFF

  • GREET DEPOSITION EXCERPTS TO ME.

  • HOW WILL THAT HELP YOU DETERMINE

  • WHETHER OR NOT THE PERSON IS

  • CREDIBLE?

  • YOU KNOW WHAT HERE SHE SAID?

  • HOW DO YOU DETERMINE CREDIBILITY

  • BASED ON THAT?

  • >> Neil: WHEN YOU HEAR THE SIX

  • WEEK TIME FRAME, THAT WILL TAKE

  • US PAST -- NOT ONLY THE IOWA

  • CAUCUSES, BUT THE PRIMARY INTO

  • SUPER TUESDAY POTENTIALLY.

  • THIS COULD REALLY BE A MESS,

  • RIGHT?

  • >> IT COULD BE.

  • I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING SIX

  • WEEKS.

  • TALK ABOUT COOL AND UNUSUAL

  • PUNISHMENT, MAKE THEM WATCH THIS

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I LT

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I LG

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I LT

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I LE

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I LT

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I LE

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I LC

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I LS

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I LE

  • GROUP FOR SIX WEEKS BECAUSE I L.

  • THAT IS TORTURE.

  • IT'S NOT GOING TO LAST SIX

  • WEEKS.

  • I DON'T SUPPORT THE MOTION TO

  • DISMISS, BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T

  • LIKE THINGS BEING SUMMARILY

  • DISMISSED.

  • AT THE HOUSE PRESENT ITS CASE.

  • DON'T THEY HAVE THE BURDEN OF

  • PERSUASION?

  • THEY ARE THE ONES THAT WANT TO

  • REMOVE DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT.

  • LET THEM GO.

  • THEN YOU CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION

  • TO DISMISS.

  • I LIKE IT AT THE END.

  • GO AHEAD AND PRESENT YOUR CASE,

  • VOTE ON IT.

  • A VOTE ON IT LIKE A REGULAR JURY

  • VOTES ON IT.

HE WAS THERE IN 2018.

字幕と単語

動画の操作 ここで「動画」の調整と「字幕」の表示を設定することができます

B1 中級

ゴウディがボルトンをなぜ執行特権を発動するような証人を選ぶのか? (Gowdy on Bolton: Why pick a witness that will invoke executive privilege?)

  • 2 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語