Placeholder Image

字幕表 動画を再生する

  • ♪.

  • >> IF HE TAKES THE RISK OF GOING

  • TO TRIAL AND HE IS CONVICTED

  • THAT COULD BE SEEN AS AN

  • IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.

  • >> IF HE IS NOT A LEGITIMATELY

  • ELECTED PRESIDENT IN YOUR MIND

  • THERE ARE TOOLS THAT CONGRESS

  • HAS.

  • >> I THINK WE'RE IN IMPEACHMENT

  • TERRITORY FOR THE FIRST TIME.

  • >> IN YOUR VIEW DOES THAT RISE

  • TO THE LEVEL OF AN IMPEACHABLE

  • OFFENSE.

  • >> WHATEVER THE WHITE HOUSE

  • THOUGHT IT WAS DOING TO DEFEND

  • ITSELF OR FEND OFF

  • IMPEACHMENT --

  • >> IMPEACHMENT.

  • STEVE: THEY HAVE BEEN TALKING

  • ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.

  • JASON CHAFFETZ FORMER HOUSE

  • GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE AND

  • AUTHOR OF A NEW BOOK, THE

  • LIBERAL SCREAM TO UNDERMINE

  • TRUMP, THE GOP AND OUR REPUBLIC.

  • THEY HAVE BEEN TALKING

  • IMPEACHMENT.

  • NANCY PELOSI IS TALKING ABOUT

  • INQUIRY, WHY HAVEN'T THEY HAD A

  • VOTE?

  • >> THE VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.

  • NANCY PELOSI GOES BEFORE THE

  • WORLD IT IS INFORMAL IMPEACHMENT

  • INQUIRY BUT SHE DOESN'T HAVE A

  • VOTE.

  • BECAUSE IT FAILED THREE TIMES F

  • THEY DID HAVE A VOTE, MINORITY

  • COULD GET RIGHTS.

  • THEY WOULD HAVE SUBPOENA

  • AUTHORITY.

  • NANCY PELOSI DOES NOT WANT DOUG

  • COLLINS, THE MINORITY MEMBER

  • ABOUT, THE RANKING MEMBER ON

  • HOUSE JUDICIARY TO ALSO TO

  • DEFEND AND TO HAVE SUBPOENA

  • AUTHORITY.

  • STEVE: RIGHT NOW IT IS LOPSIDED.

  • >> IT IS LOPSIDED.

  • THEY WANT TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS,

  • WANT TO DO ALL THIS, BUT DON'T

  • WANT TO GIVE THE MINORITY TO

  • ACTUALLY DO THE SAME THING.

  • THAT IS WHY SHE REFUSES TO DO

  • THAT.

  • AINSLEY: IF HE IS ABLE TO DO

  • THAT, WHEN HE IS ABLE TO DO

  • THAT, WHO WILL BE SUBPOENAING?

  • >> A WHOLE HOST THE PEOPLE.

  • HUNTER BIDEN SHOULD BE BROUGHT

  • IN.

  • YOU COULD GO THROUGH A WHOLE

  • LIST OF THINGS.

  • LET'S FIND OUT, DO SOME

  • INVESTIGATION.

  • SOMETIME FOR REPUBLICANS TO PLAY

  • OFFENSE.

  • REPUBLICANS ARE USED TO

  • APOLOGIZING AND TRYING TO

  • JUSTIFY.

  • NANCY PELOSI AND THE DEMOCRATS

  • THEY'RE ALWAYS PLAYING OFFENSE

  • BUT NANCY PELOSI KNOWS THAT SHE

  • HAS GOT TO WITHHOLD THAT ABILITY

  • OF THE REPUBLICANS TO ACTUALLY

  • DO WHAT THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO

  • DO IS CREATE THE OTHER SIDE OF

  • THE CASE.

  • BRIAN: RIGHT AWAY THEY WERE

  • TALKING ABOUT IMPEACHMENT ALMOST

  • IMMEDIATELY AFTER BUT NOTHING

  • WOULD RISE TO THAT LEVEL.

  • WHY DO YOU THINK THIS UKRAINIAN

  • CONVERSATION, EVERYONE SEEMED TO

  • BE IN SYNC FROM CERTAIN MEDIA

  • OUTLETS TO SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE,

  • BEFORE THE CALL WAS RELEASED,

  • BEFORE THE NINE-PAGE COMPLAINT

  • WAS OUT?

  • >> IT IS A LITTLE TOO CONVENIENT

  • THEY HAD A PERFECTLY DRAFFED

  • DOCUMENT.

  • YOU HAD A SPEAKER WHO SAID ON

  • "60 MINUTES" HAD A PREVIEW OF

  • IT.

  • VANYA

  • ADAM SCHIFF SAID HE KNEW

  • IDENTITY OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER.

  • IT'S A LITTLE TOO CONVENIENT.

  • INSPECTOR HOROWITZ AND DURHAM

  • COMING OUT.

  • BRIAN: WITH A COUNTER NARRATIVE

  • ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION OF

  • DONALD TRUMP BUT THIS, THEY HOPE

  • PUN INTENDED TRUMPS THAT?

  • >> WELL LOOK, IF ADAM SCHIFF

  • REALLY HAD THE GOODS ON THE

  • PRESIDENT HE WOULD HAVE LED WITH

  • THAT.

  • INSTEAD, HE TO EMBELLISH WHAT

  • THE PRESIDENT SAID, LIE ABOUT

  • IT.

  • BY THE WAY THE HOUSE SHOULD

  • STAND UP FOR ITSELF.

  • KEVIN AMERICA CART THINK SHOULD

  • DEMAND SHOULD HAVE TAKEN WORDS

  • DOWN IN THAT COMMITTEE.

  • YOU CANNOT DISPARAGE THE

  • PRESIDENT.

  • YOU CANNOT ADDRESS THE

  • PRESIDENT.

  • THERE ARE HOUSE RULES THEY

  • SHOULD GO AFTER THIS GUY, HE

  • SHOULD BE CENSURED SCHIFF

  • SHOULD.

  • BRIAN: WHAT GUY?

  • >> SCHIFF.

  • HE DID THE PARODY EMBELLISHED.

  • HE LIED ABOUT WHAT THE PRESIDENT

  • SAID.

  • I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS TREASON.

  • IT IS IN VIOLATION OF HOUSE

  • RULES.

  • THEY SHOULD CALL IT OUT AND PASS

  • ON THAT.

  • BRIAN: HE WAS READING FROM A

  • PAPER AS IF IT WAS DIALOGUE.

  • >> THIS WAS HIGHLY SCRIPTED.

  • THIS WAS NOT SOME I AM PROBLEM

  • TU THING, HE DID IT ON PURPOSE

  • BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE ISN'T

  • THERE.

  • THE EVIDENCE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH.

  • THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE TO GO

  • OUT --

  • AINSLEY: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

  • WHEN WILL THE VOTE HAPPEN.

  • >> SUCH URGENT NATIONAL CONCERN

  • THEY HAD TO GO ON RECESS FOR TWO

  • WEEKS SO DEMOCRATS CAN DO

  • POLLING TO FIGURE OUT, LET'S

  • FIGURE OUT WHERE WE'RE GOING

  • NEXT.

  • BRIAN: 50/50 WHETHER THE PEOPLE

  • WANT IT.

  • >> I DON'T THINK SO.

  • STEVE: REALLY INTERESTING HOW

  • YOU EXPLAIN WHY THEY DID NOT

  • TAKE A VOTE.

  • IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE.

  • CHECK AT HESS NEW BOOK.

  • IT IS CALLED, "POWER GRAB."

  • BRIAN: REALLY NOT APPROPRIATE

  • WHAT IS GOING ON NOW.

  • >> THIS IS CHAPTER ON

♪.

字幕と単語

動画の操作 ここで「動画」の調整と「字幕」の表示を設定することができます

B1 中級

チャフェッツ氏は、ペロシが弾劾について正式な投票を行わない理由を説明しています。 (Chaffetz explains why Pelosi hasn't held a formal vote on impeachment)

  • 0 0
    林宜悉 に公開 2021 年 01 月 14 日
動画の中の単語