字幕表 動画を再生する
-
♪.
-
>> IF HE TAKES THE RISK OF GOING
-
TO TRIAL AND HE IS CONVICTED
-
THAT COULD BE SEEN AS AN
-
IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.
-
>> IF HE IS NOT A LEGITIMATELY
-
ELECTED PRESIDENT IN YOUR MIND
-
THERE ARE TOOLS THAT CONGRESS
-
HAS.
-
>> I THINK WE'RE IN IMPEACHMENT
-
TERRITORY FOR THE FIRST TIME.
-
>> IN YOUR VIEW DOES THAT RISE
-
TO THE LEVEL OF AN IMPEACHABLE
-
OFFENSE.
-
>> WHATEVER THE WHITE HOUSE
-
THOUGHT IT WAS DOING TO DEFEND
-
ITSELF OR FEND OFF
-
IMPEACHMENT --
-
>> IMPEACHMENT.
-
STEVE: THEY HAVE BEEN TALKING
-
ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.
-
JASON CHAFFETZ FORMER HOUSE
-
GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE AND
-
AUTHOR OF A NEW BOOK, THE
-
LIBERAL SCREAM TO UNDERMINE
-
TRUMP, THE GOP AND OUR REPUBLIC.
-
THEY HAVE BEEN TALKING
-
IMPEACHMENT.
-
NANCY PELOSI IS TALKING ABOUT
-
INQUIRY, WHY HAVEN'T THEY HAD A
-
VOTE?
-
>> THE VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT.
-
NANCY PELOSI GOES BEFORE THE
-
WORLD IT IS INFORMAL IMPEACHMENT
-
INQUIRY BUT SHE DOESN'T HAVE A
-
VOTE.
-
BECAUSE IT FAILED THREE TIMES F
-
THEY DID HAVE A VOTE, MINORITY
-
COULD GET RIGHTS.
-
THEY WOULD HAVE SUBPOENA
-
AUTHORITY.
-
NANCY PELOSI DOES NOT WANT DOUG
-
COLLINS, THE MINORITY MEMBER
-
ABOUT, THE RANKING MEMBER ON
-
HOUSE JUDICIARY TO ALSO TO
-
DEFEND AND TO HAVE SUBPOENA
-
AUTHORITY.
-
STEVE: RIGHT NOW IT IS LOPSIDED.
-
>> IT IS LOPSIDED.
-
THEY WANT TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS,
-
WANT TO DO ALL THIS, BUT DON'T
-
WANT TO GIVE THE MINORITY TO
-
ACTUALLY DO THE SAME THING.
-
THAT IS WHY SHE REFUSES TO DO
-
THAT.
-
AINSLEY: IF HE IS ABLE TO DO
-
THAT, WHEN HE IS ABLE TO DO
-
THAT, WHO WILL BE SUBPOENAING?
-
>> A WHOLE HOST THE PEOPLE.
-
HUNTER BIDEN SHOULD BE BROUGHT
-
IN.
-
YOU COULD GO THROUGH A WHOLE
-
LIST OF THINGS.
-
LET'S FIND OUT, DO SOME
-
INVESTIGATION.
-
SOMETIME FOR REPUBLICANS TO PLAY
-
OFFENSE.
-
REPUBLICANS ARE USED TO
-
APOLOGIZING AND TRYING TO
-
JUSTIFY.
-
NANCY PELOSI AND THE DEMOCRATS
-
THEY'RE ALWAYS PLAYING OFFENSE
-
BUT NANCY PELOSI KNOWS THAT SHE
-
HAS GOT TO WITHHOLD THAT ABILITY
-
OF THE REPUBLICANS TO ACTUALLY
-
DO WHAT THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO
-
DO IS CREATE THE OTHER SIDE OF
-
THE CASE.
-
BRIAN: RIGHT AWAY THEY WERE
-
TALKING ABOUT IMPEACHMENT ALMOST
-
IMMEDIATELY AFTER BUT NOTHING
-
WOULD RISE TO THAT LEVEL.
-
WHY DO YOU THINK THIS UKRAINIAN
-
CONVERSATION, EVERYONE SEEMED TO
-
BE IN SYNC FROM CERTAIN MEDIA
-
OUTLETS TO SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE,
-
BEFORE THE CALL WAS RELEASED,
-
BEFORE THE NINE-PAGE COMPLAINT
-
WAS OUT?
-
>> IT IS A LITTLE TOO CONVENIENT
-
THEY HAD A PERFECTLY DRAFFED
-
DOCUMENT.
-
YOU HAD A SPEAKER WHO SAID ON
-
"60 MINUTES" HAD A PREVIEW OF
-
IT.
-
VANYA
-
ADAM SCHIFF SAID HE KNEW
-
IDENTITY OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER.
-
IT'S A LITTLE TOO CONVENIENT.
-
INSPECTOR HOROWITZ AND DURHAM
-
COMING OUT.
-
BRIAN: WITH A COUNTER NARRATIVE
-
ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION OF
-
DONALD TRUMP BUT THIS, THEY HOPE
-
PUN INTENDED TRUMPS THAT?
-
>> WELL LOOK, IF ADAM SCHIFF
-
REALLY HAD THE GOODS ON THE
-
PRESIDENT HE WOULD HAVE LED WITH
-
THAT.
-
INSTEAD, HE TO EMBELLISH WHAT
-
THE PRESIDENT SAID, LIE ABOUT
-
IT.
-
BY THE WAY THE HOUSE SHOULD
-
STAND UP FOR ITSELF.
-
KEVIN AMERICA CART THINK SHOULD
-
DEMAND SHOULD HAVE TAKEN WORDS
-
DOWN IN THAT COMMITTEE.
-
YOU CANNOT DISPARAGE THE
-
PRESIDENT.
-
YOU CANNOT ADDRESS THE
-
PRESIDENT.
-
THERE ARE HOUSE RULES THEY
-
SHOULD GO AFTER THIS GUY, HE
-
SHOULD BE CENSURED SCHIFF
-
SHOULD.
-
BRIAN: WHAT GUY?
-
>> SCHIFF.
-
HE DID THE PARODY EMBELLISHED.
-
HE LIED ABOUT WHAT THE PRESIDENT
-
SAID.
-
I DON'T KNOW IF IT IS TREASON.
-
IT IS IN VIOLATION OF HOUSE
-
RULES.
-
THEY SHOULD CALL IT OUT AND PASS
-
ON THAT.
-
BRIAN: HE WAS READING FROM A
-
PAPER AS IF IT WAS DIALOGUE.
-
>> THIS WAS HIGHLY SCRIPTED.
-
THIS WAS NOT SOME I AM PROBLEM
-
TU THING, HE DID IT ON PURPOSE
-
BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE ISN'T
-
THERE.
-
THE EVIDENCE IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
-
THAT IS WHY THEY HAVE TO GO
-
OUT --
-
AINSLEY: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
-
WHEN WILL THE VOTE HAPPEN.
-
>> SUCH URGENT NATIONAL CONCERN
-
THEY HAD TO GO ON RECESS FOR TWO
-
WEEKS SO DEMOCRATS CAN DO
-
POLLING TO FIGURE OUT, LET'S
-
FIGURE OUT WHERE WE'RE GOING
-
NEXT.
-
BRIAN: 50/50 WHETHER THE PEOPLE
-
WANT IT.
-
>> I DON'T THINK SO.
-
STEVE: REALLY INTERESTING HOW
-
YOU EXPLAIN WHY THEY DID NOT
-
TAKE A VOTE.
-
IT MAKES PERFECT SENSE.
-
CHECK AT HESS NEW BOOK.
-
IT IS CALLED, "POWER GRAB."
-
BRIAN: REALLY NOT APPROPRIATE
-
WHAT IS GOING ON NOW.
-
>> THIS IS CHAPTER ON